Black & White Practice
18,610 topics in this forum
-
- 2 replies
- 65 views
-
- 6 replies
- 434 views
-
- 21 replies
- 412 views
-
- 21 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 7 replies
- 353 views
-
- 18 replies
- 422 views
-
- 2 replies
- 213 views
-
- 11 replies
- 288 views
-
- 14 replies
- 416 views
-
- 2 replies
- 267 views
-
- 3 replies
- 290 views
-
- 22 replies
- 776 views
-
- 9 replies
- 505 views
-
- 9 replies
- 372 views
-
- 8 replies
- 549 views
-
- 8 replies
- 515 views
-
- 13 replies
- 798 views
-
- 2 replies
- 322 views
-
- 21 replies
- 779 views
-
- 11 replies
- 469 views
-
- 7 replies
- 380 views
-
- 27 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 13 replies
- 641 views
-
- 13 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 23 replies
- 1.2k views
-
Who's Online 24 Members, 0 Anonymous, 271 Guests (See full list)
-
Recent Gallery Images
-
Recent Forum Wide Posts
-
-
By ilkka_nissila · Posted
They added a fast 35, an 135, etc. I don't there is any sign of Nikon slowing down lens development. But the roadmap is not really needed any more. In the beginning they needed the roadmap to assure customers that lenses would come but now most things are already there, so they could just announce new lenses when they are ready. But the roadmap could be a useful marketing tool. The problem with it is that sometimes people won't buy lenses that are already available (even if they are suitable for the task), instead they wait for some future lenses on the roadmap. That's not good for Nikon if it happens. E.g. I am guessing that if Nikon had not placed the 200-600 on the roadmap, a lot more people might have purchased the 100-400 or 400/4.5 + 1.4x. (This is just an example, and I'm not saying it is what happened, but there is a risk of lost or post-poned sales when there is too much pre-announced.) -
-
By Bill Neubaum · Posted
Long lens atop Cadillac Mtn, Acadia NP -
By mike_halliwell · Posted
Resurrect the old 200mm f4 macro? 2nd hand prices are still crazy! or maybe update and licence the Sigma 180mm f2.8 OS 1:1 macro into Z Mount ?
-
