The Wet Darkroom: Film, Paper & Chemistry
Subforums
-
- 175.3k
- posts
-
- No posts here yet
15,351 topics in this forum
-
- 4 replies
- 46 views
-
- 11 replies
- 297 views
-
- 0 replies
- 74 views
-
- 5 replies
- 284 views
-
- 4 replies
- 245 views
-
- 13 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 1 reply
- 202 views
-
- 19 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 6 replies
- 703 views
-
- 21 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 2 replies
- 421 views
-
- 1 reply
- 195 views
-
- 13 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 26 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 47 replies
- 3.9k views
-
- 6 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 5 replies
- 492 views
-
- 4 replies
- 447 views
-
- 2 replies
- 372 views
-
- 3 replies
- 551 views
-
- 7 replies
- 401 views
-
- 3 replies
- 447 views
-
- 16 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 4 replies
- 993 views
-
- 3 replies
- 774 views
-
Who's Online 10 Members, 0 Anonymous, 232 Guests (See full list)
-
Recent Gallery Images
-
Recent Forum Wide Posts
-
-
By Gradespire- · Posted
Are you struggling with your C++ programming assignments? Don't worry! Gradespire is here to provide you with top-notch C++ programming assignment help. Our team of experienced programmers is ready to assist you at every step of your assignment, from understanding the basics to tackling complex problems. Whether you're debugging errors, or conceptualizing algorithms, we've got you covered. With Gradespire, you can submit your assignments with confidence and achieve the grades you deserve. Say goodbye to stress and hello to success with our C++ programming assignment help services! -
By ilkka_nissila · Posted
To my eyes it looks like the bird's eye is not in focus. This is one of the problems of cropping deep (10x...), as the camera manufacturers don't design the focus areas to work optimally with such small parts of the frame. Having adequate sharpness and depth of field at the individual pixel level is very demanding for 45 MP let alone higher. The camera has to process a larger amount of data and achieve focus to a higher precision. That's just not workable with today's technology in my opinion. I saw two lynx in Porkkala yesterday, but they were fairly far away (120-150 m) and I only had a 300 mm. In this shot, the camera seems to have focused on the rock rather than the animal. About 10% was cropped from the bottom and right: In a large print, the slight misfocus doesn't bother me but when I made a significant crop (3-4x from the original) and printed that then it just doesn't quite sit right. In the overall image I would have preferred a lower vantage point (I was on a hill somewhat higher than the lynx so the agriculture equipment tracks show rather than the forest as background immediately behind the lynx. However, I am not comfortable stalking the lynx and getting into a better position - much as I like photography, this isn't going to happen. For landscape with a tripod, studio shots with flash etc. there can be benefits from going higher in the pixel count, but I think the autofocus precision, atmospheric effects, and noise are the main limitations preventing the use of deeply cropped images in wildlife photography. -
-
By Gradespire- · Posted
Are you struggling with your Java programming assignments? Look no further than GradeSpire! Our team of experienced tutors is here to provide comprehensive Java programming assignment help tailored to your specific needs. Whether you're grappling with basic concepts or tackling advanced topics, our experts are ready to guide you through every step of the way. Get top-notch assistance, clear explanations, and timely support to excel in your Java programming assignments. Don't let challenges hold you back—unlock your full potential with GradeSpire's Java programming assignment help today.
-
