Accessories
Subforums
-
- 110.7k
- posts
18,731 topics in this forum
-
- 2 replies
- 554 views
-
- 1 reply
- 563 views
-
- 16 replies
- 2k views
-
- 29 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 6 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 6 replies
- 935 views
-
- 14 replies
- 3.4k views
-
- 4 replies
- 894 views
-
- 7 replies
- 4.1k views
-
- 10 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 11 replies
- 953 views
-
- 24 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 15 replies
- 3.3k views
-
- 10 replies
- 2.7k views
-
- 2 replies
- 654 views
-
- 3 replies
- 713 views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 1 reply
- 457 views
-
- 18 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 33 replies
- 2.7k views
-
- 1 reply
- 533 views
-
- 6 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 1 reply
- 549 views
-
- 7 replies
- 997 views
-
Who's Online 17 Members, 0 Anonymous, 454 Guests (See full list)
-
Recent Gallery Images
-
Recent Forum Wide Posts
-
By john_shriver · Posted
There were very high domestic excise taxes on cameras in Japan in that era. So cameras to be sold through the post exchanges to American GI's were specially marked because they would not be taxed. A Japanese citizen with an <EP> or <CPO> marked camera would be presumed to be a tax dodger. For similar reasons, the Nikkormat was known as the Nikomat in Japan -- to make it clear that was the domestic "taxed" model. -
By john_shriver · Posted
Probably without rangefinder coupling, since they describe them as "mirrorless." -
-
-
-
