<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Accessories Latest Topics</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/forum/12-accessories/</link><description>Accessories Latest Topics</description><language>en</language><item><title>Sekonic L 408 F/EV MULTI button not working</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/534786-sekonic-l-408-fev-multi-button-not-working/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>My Sekonic L 408 has a problem with the F/EV MULTI button.  </p><p>
Instead of switching the display from EV to shutter priority to aperture priority, it just cancels the last reading to zero.</p><p>
So, that means that the button does something, just not the right thing. </p><p>
Everything else works fine. </p><p>
Any ideas about how to fix this?</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">534786</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2022 22:08:16 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Benro FS20PRO 501 Hybrid Photo/Video Head</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/724403-benro-fs20pro-501-hybrid-photovideo-head/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	<span style="background-color:#ffffff;color:#0a0a0a;font-size:16px;">Anyone have any experience with the Benro FS20PRO 501 Hybrid Photo/Video Head (<a href="https://benrousa.com/benro-fs20proc501-hybrid-photo-video-head/?srsltid=AfmBOorC1pynHP8M2BeTdCcIJgKx-t6dLK_y5_0TOkh8rn_IfqbCWYLC" rel="external nofollow">https://benrousa.com/benro-fs20proc501-hybrid-photo-video-head/?srsltid=AfmBOorC1pynHP8M2BeTdCcIJgKx-t6dLK_y5_0TOkh8rn_IfqbCWYLC</a>)?  I am in search of a hybrid pan/tilt-ball head and this is the closest I've been able to find, at lease in my budget (under 200$).  My kit is going to be pretty light - 5 pounds at most.  I'll be using mostly for landscape as well as dipping my toe into some macro work (which is the primary reason for wanting the control of a pan/tilt).  I also do some wildlife, hence the desire for a ball head option.  Kit consists of Nikon D7500, Nikon 16-80, Nikon 300 f/4 PF, and a Nikon 105mm micro.  I do not plan on doing much if any video work. I want to stick with arca swiss type quick release.  Thanks in advance.</span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">724403</guid><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2026 18:02:48 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>How to clean the INSIDE of glass on AGFA DuoScan f40 scanner</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/724363-how-to-clean-the-inside-of-glass-on-agfa-duoscan-f40-scanner/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Hello everyone,
</p>

<p>
	This is my first post. I cannot find the correct forum for my questeions, so I choose this because of a similar post.
</p>

<p>
	Ok – I hope so much that there might be a solution to my problem, since AGFA Support hasn't gotten back to me <span class="ipsEmoji">🙄</span>
</p>

<p>
	The fixed glass and interior of my Agfa DuoScan f40 from maybe 2002 are so dirty that I'm constantly busy retouching.<br />
	I actually have a second one now, and its interior is much cleaner, but the glass panel also has a cloudy film on the bottom, the streaks of which can also be seen in the scan.
</p>

<p>
	So how do I remove the cover that holds the glass panel in place? It's a separate part, but the user manual doesn't mention it. At the back, between the lid hinges, there is a recess that looks exactly like an opening mechanism, but even there – no success. I cannot press, move or somethigs else at this recess. I am attaching two photos of it.
</p>

<p>
	Maybe someone here knows what to do?
</p>

<p>
	I've already been through French chat rooms and even contacted Agfa support! They're probably still laughing. Or googling.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	Thanks in advance!
</p>

<p>
	Sophia
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="//media.invisioncic.com/l323473/monthly_2026_02/IMG_1793.jpg.f7acde4169a943f208dba1edb93e66de.jpg" data-fileid="1060761" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="1060761" data-ratio="100.00" width="1250" alt="IMG_1793.thumb.jpg.87fb03d505367fd29d7b54b5751fd454.jpg" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/l323473/monthly_2026_02/IMG_1793.thumb.jpg.87fb03d505367fd29d7b54b5751fd454.jpg" src="https://www.photo.net/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p><a href="//media.invisioncic.com/l323473/monthly_2026_02/IMG_1792.jpg.f93107fd3857e646bf330392cce2dafb.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="1060760" src="https://www.photo.net/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/l323473/monthly_2026_02/IMG_1792.thumb.jpg.d269295e66d4811d85a9b14b0b7746d1.jpg" data-ratio="100" width="1250" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="IMG_1792.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">724363</guid><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:06:57 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Choosing a medium format enlarger model</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/724325-choosing-a-medium-format-enlarger-model/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Hi everyone,<br />
	I'd like to ask for your advice on which enlarger model to buy for the 6x4.5 medium format. I imagine it won't be an easy choice because there are quite a few enlargers, but I know that different models can have different negative holders or condensers.
</p>

<p>
	The fact is, a friend and I printed some 35mm photos, and since I have a medium format camera and medium format enlarger lenses, I'd also like to get some printing equipment, but I'm not sure which models to choose without spending a fortune.
</p>

<p>
	For 35mm, perhaps having glass in the negative holder isn't necessary, even though we use it, and it must be said that there have been few difficulties with printing, with prints always being fairly even in the center and edges.
</p>

<p>
	For medium format, perhaps glass is even more important.
</p>

<p>
	Some very popular models are the Durst M600 and the Meopta Opemus Standard 2.
</p>

<p>
	I found the Durst M600 with this negative holder:<br />
	<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DuxHj2Tj-HJBHG-7qY8yUchr9-Cw6kYj/view?usp=sharing" rel="external nofollow">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DuxHj2Tj-HJBHG-7qY8yUchr9-Cw6kYj/view?usp=sharing</a>
</p>

<p>
	While I found the Meopta Opemus Standard 2 with this negative holder and condenser:<br />
	<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VZU_FzqTA9I7xGwJWp46Byqtbjiu2T_r/view?usp=sharing" rel="external nofollow">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VZU_FzqTA9I7xGwJWp46Byqtbjiu2T_r/view?usp=sharing</a><br />
	<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EaX_8i34-pT3GvdTv2lwwCIL273FAj_r/view?usp=sharing" rel="external nofollow">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EaX_8i34-pT3GvdTv2lwwCIL273FAj_r/view?usp=sharing</a>
</p>

<p>
	The Meopta negative holder seems very good to me, and it comes in this format. Status:<br />
	<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rEArG_-CVz_Pzmes-wKDb5UX3uiVsgGL/view?usp=sharing" rel="external nofollow">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rEArG_-CVz_Pzmes-wKDb5UX3uiVsgGL/view?usp=sharing</a><br />
	<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/12XrZAeNXmyArX-vG3P6Uxqq3GzNbmRt_/view?usp=sharing" rel="external nofollow">https://drive.google.com/file/d/12XrZAeNXmyArX-vG3P6Uxqq3GzNbmRt_/view?usp=sharing</a>
</p>

<p>
	The finish near the supporting column is a bit damaged.
</p>

<p>
	The thread should be M39 for both, right?
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">724325</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 22:09:20 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Do any ball-heads actually have a 'sweet spot'?</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/723779-do-any-ball-heads-actually-have-a-sweet-spot/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I'll admit straight off that I'm not a fan of ball (and socket) heads on tripods. For the reason that none of them seem to have a sweet spot in their locking adjustment. By 'sweet spot' I mean having sufficient friction to hold the camera and lens steady, but still slack enough to allow precise placement of the field of view. 
</p>

<p>
	I know that ball-heads are quite popular with other users here, but I fail to see the attraction. All of the ball-heads I've tried only have three states; namely
</p>

<p>
	1. Totally sloppy but allowing free and fairly precise movement of the camera.
</p>

<p>
	2. Semi-locked and supporting the camera, but juddering and stuttering under pressure and not allowing precise pointing of the lens at all.
</p>

<p>
	3. Completely locked up - a good thing only if the lens ends up pointing where you need it to.
</p>

<p>
	My experience is that nowhere in between totally sloppy, and uselessly juddery, is to be found at any point of rotation of the locking knob. 
</p>

<p>
	Maybe I just haven't found the right head? However, I've tried quite a few, and spent considerable time fiddling with the friction adjusting set-screw in a vain attempt to find that sweet spot. I've tried greasing the ball, which helps with the judder slightly, and I've tried leaving the ball dry. But that 'just right' balance of friction and smooth movement I cannot find. 
</p>

<p>
	Now I just stick with 3 way pan-tilt heads on my tripods. At least I can point the lens exactly where I want it with those.
</p>

<p>
	The only exception is with a monopod. A ball-head works OK there, because I can make fine adjustments by moving the whole thing around.
</p>

<p>
	So is there any such thing as a firm-yet-smooth ball and socket head?
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">723779</guid><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2025 17:01:04 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Good hand held stabilizer for Canon R1 + 24-105 F2.8 USM Z Lens combo</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/723783-good-hand-held-stabilizer-for-canon-r1-24-105-f28-usm-z-lens-combo/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I am looking at the total weight and it seems pretty heavy. I do not see R1 listed in the DJI RS 4 Pro gimbal list of cameras supported while i see R3 and other canon 1 series cameras listed.
</p>

<p>
	What is the reason for that? Is it the gimbal that doesnt work or the other electronic control transmission that does not work?
</p>

<p>
	Can I take photo and video with this setup? I know the R1 has the mode switcher above, but can the modes be switched in any other way?
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	What other good hand held options are there to help with this? Or should I not bother with this setup as it is too heavy?
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	I already have the R1 camera for photography and thinking about doing some video work with it also.
</p>

<p>
	Mainly for small events where my customers keep asking for video help also.
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">723783</guid><pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2025 13:58:32 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>soldering advice please</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/723163-soldering-advice-please/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	The pic shows the problem :  the end of the remote cable has come off the 2.5mm plug terminals.
</p>

<p>
	What's the easiest way to solder the two wires : the thinnest wire, top one,  goes to the centre of the plug.
</p>

<p>
	Thanks!<img class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="1051924" data-ratio="64.29" width="1260" alt="image.jpeg.0fff0416d74f4634c44df976acf40f13.jpeg" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/l323473/monthly_2025_09/image.jpeg.0fff0416d74f4634c44df976acf40f13.jpeg" src="https://www.photo.net/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" />
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">723163</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 16:15:28 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Heliopan Infrared filter RG715</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/722601-heliopan-infrared-filter-rg715/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Can the Heliopan IR filter RG715 be used on non-converted cameras? And if yes, how does the effect differ from its use on a converted camera? 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">722601</guid><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 19:28:32 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Spotmeter repair?</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/699522-spotmeter-repair/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Hi folks. This is my first time posting here. <br />
	About a year ago I purchased a Minolta Spotmeter M at a photo flea market. I’m just now getting around to trying to use it but it seems to have an electrical problem. The LCD display flickers on and off, seemingly because the power is being cut. The first setting after powering on is to set ASA but, as the display keeps flickering, the meter resets to 100 ASA every time the display flickers back on. <br />
	I’m using a brand new battery and the contacts in the battery compartment are clean. <br />
	So my question is, are these older spot meters repairable? If so, would the expense of sending it out for repair be worth it or should I just replace it? This particular meter seems to be around $150 used on eBay  
</p>

<p>
	Thanks!
</p>

<p>
	José
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">699522</guid><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 19:51:58 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Camera Bag Recommendation for Travel? Body + 3 lenses</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/722424-camera-bag-recommendation-for-travel-body-3-lenses/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Hi everyone,
</p>

<p>
	I'm about to travel to a tropical, humid climate and I'm looking for a shoulder camera bag that works well both for walking around and for transporting gear on planes and trains.
</p>

<p>
	I'll be bringing: Nikon D850 + AF-S 20mm f/1.8G + 28mm f/1.4E + 85mm f/1.4.
</p>

<p>
	This kit doesn’t fit in my smaller bag, but my larger one — Domke F-833 — is too big to carry around comfortably.
</p>

<p>
	What shoulder bags would you recommend for this kind of setup and environment?
</p>

<p>
	Thanks in advance!
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">722424</guid><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2025 12:34:08 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Mirror only retracts half-way when focusing on infinity...</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/208423-mirror-only-retracts-half-way-when-focusing-on-infinity/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>Anybody have a clue as to why the mirror on my Yashica 230-AF only </p><p>retracts half-way when I focus on infinity with my Yashica 50mm f1.8 </p><p>autofocus lens?  It works fine with close-ups! I have no such </p><p>problems with the 35-70mm autofocus zoom lens. I just bought the </p><p>50mm lens from a dealer in England: it's old stock, but barely used.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">208423</guid><pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 14:12:19 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Remove a tripod head</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/711979-remove-a-tripod-head/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I have a Cameron CF700 tripod and would like to remove the ball head.
</p>

<p>
	It looks like in the instructions it is removable but the instructions aren't the best.
</p>

<p>
	Does anyone have one of these that can confirm it is removable.   
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Thanks
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">711979</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 05:50:35 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Trouble finding filters for the Balda Baldessa 1a</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/705916-trouble-finding-filters-for-the-balda-baldessa-1a/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Hello, I have a 'vintage' Balda Baldessa 1a camera that I wish to shoot Candido 800 colour film in.
</p>

<p>
	I do want to shoot some pictures out in daylight, however, finding a warming filter for this camera has been quite difficult.
</p>

<p>
	It has a Baldanar 1:2.8/45 lens that works with push on filters (I think they're around 33mm). When I bought this camera it came with a size 370 Kodisk cloud filter and lens hood, but any attempt to find similar filters online have been difficult, especially 'type A' filters.
</p>

<p>
	A similar type of lens filter I can use is the Series VI 1 5/16" adaptor with a Series VI Type A filter. But, all the filters that fit the bill have been in the USA, which can be expensive to buy and take some time to ship over.
</p>

<p>
	I do have the manual for this camera, and it does show that Balda has its own filters but I have not been able to find any information on them.
</p>

<p>
	I live in the south of the United Kingdom, and I was wondering if anyone knew some place I could go to search for any filter I could possibly use.
</p>

<p>
	Thank you.
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">705916</guid><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 01:53:47 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Do you use Glimmerglass Filters, or Are you looking into them?</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/704925-do-you-use-glimmerglass-filters-or-are-you-looking-into-them/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I learned about Glimmerglass, made by Tiffen, in the <em>American Cinematographer.</em>  A diffusion type filter, they are used in cinematography and in portrait photography to lower contrast; to make digital images look more like film; and add some sparkle (glimmer?) to a photo.  They are all over eBay and there are articles on Youtube.  They are pricey!  I have done a lot of reading and looking online, but haven't bought one.  I don't take portraits but might like to try one in the garden, or for landscapes and such.
</p>

<p>
	A drawback is they are not coated, causing flare when used outdoors.  Strange!
</p>

<p>
	I'm looking for user reports, sharing of questions and comments, general interest.
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">704925</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 02:31:23 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Godox MS200-V: minimal recycle time vs max firing FPS</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/682024-godox-ms200-v-minimal-recycle-time-vs-max-firing-fps/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Hello,<br />
	I recently bought a cheap Godox MS200-V mini-monobloc, and I must say that for the price (~100€) it is a steal.<br />
	Now, it is listed as having a recycle time between 0.1s and 1.8s.<br />
	Naively believing that at minimal power (1/32) the lower value of 0.1s could be attained -- for a maximum firing rate of about 10 FPS -- I tried to use it first with my Nikon F3/MD4 combination (4.6 FPS), then with my D800 (4 FPS), both through the X2T controller and directly cabled, then at last by activating the test button directly on the flash head.<br />
	The maximal flash firing rate I could attain was about 2 FPS in each case; more precisely, at 4 FPS on the D800, one frame out of two was unlit from a sequence of 20.
</p>

<p>
	So my questions are:<br />
	1) did any of you make similar tests ?<br />
	2) what do you think the listed 0.1s recycle time means ?<br />
	Best,<br />
	Marc
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">682024</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 16:46:24 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yongnuo YN560III flash & Godox XProIIN wireless flash trigger not synching - like WTF?]]></title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/696849-yongnuo-yn560iii-flash-godox-xproiin-wireless-flash-trigger-not-synching-like-wtf/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Of course, minimal manual info provided.   Cycled through a few YouTube videos.   Both on Group A/Channel 1.    Light on RX mode.   Test flash from trigger - nothing.   Does not work on camera either.    Am I missing something obvious?    Friend in Europe runs the same setup for macro reptile photography.   
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">696849</guid><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 03:33:10 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[B&W circular polarizer disassembly process?]]></title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/606935-bw-circular-polarizer-disassembly-process/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Hello all.  I have a B&amp;W 100mm circular polarizer that needs to be cleaned inside.  Is this something that is possible?  These things are kinda pricey, so it's not something I want to just replace out of hand.  If anyone can direct me into how to take one apart, I would appreciate it, as I've never taken one apart.
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">606935</guid><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2024 15:25:06 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Photographic Thingamajigs or Thingamabobs</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/549925-photographic-thingamajigs-or-thingamabobs/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="//media.invisioncic.com/l323473/monthly_2023_08/CameraThingmabob.jpg.e8e9de5bc482c9b31514a40e01dda5fb.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="984908" src="https://www.photo.net/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/l323473/monthly_2023_08/CameraThingmabob.jpg.e8e9de5bc482c9b31514a40e01dda5fb.jpg" data-ratio="101.47" width="545" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Camera Thingmabob.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">549925</guid><pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2023 18:16:14 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>cant get film picker to work</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/689647-cant-get-film-picker-to-work/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I can't get mine to work, its an LG Film Picker 3, just wont pull any film out, v. annoying as its a new film and am following instructions<img class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="1034550" data-ratio="36.33" width="1500" alt="DSC_9058.JPG.633a0a770f2862d6aa5c48c094701324.JPG" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/l323473/monthly_2025_02/DSC_9058.JPG.633a0a770f2862d6aa5c48c094701324.JPG" src="https://www.photo.net/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" />
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">689647</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 11:27:22 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Quantum Turbo 2x2 Battery Replacement</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/550365-quantum-turbo-2x2-battery-replacement/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I've replaced my fair share of batteries in Quantum packs of different generations, but this one has me stumped and I'm wondering if anyone can offer any insight.
</p>

<p>
	The 2x2 uses 4/5 Sub C NiMH cells. I don't actually know how many, but I have plenty on hand to do it(I ended up buying 25). If I had to guess it's either 7 or 8 but don't actually know(the original Turbo uses an 8V battery...).
</p>

<p>
	In any case, it's easy enough to pull the "brains" out, but I'm stuck with actually getting the cells out of the case. It uses the same style leatherette type case as the QB1/2/Turbo, although a different size and shape. It seems as though Quantum used a double sized foam tape to secure the pack to the case.
</p>

<p>
	I've gone in with a knife and thin straight edge to cut the 4 strips of tape I've found, and have twisted and otherwise manipulated the case any way I can think of. There's no way to get a good hold on the battery pack that I can see short of yanking on the wires, and no amount of shaking or anything else seems to even get the battery pack to want to budge.
</p>

<p>
	Has anyone done one of these before themselves?
</p>

<p>
	BTW, I'm not a stranger to re-celling in general and once I can get the pack out and use it as a template I'm equipped to "do it right". I have a spot welder, a selection of nickel strips to weld the batteries together, and plenty of shrink wrap for battery packs in different sizes. I just need to get the pack out!
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">550365</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2023 00:20:17 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Rollei  6x6 projector focus</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/88214-rollei-6x6-projector-focus/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>I've got a Rollei P66S medium format projector that is having a</p><p>
problem with the auto focus function. </p><p> </p><p>
The auto focus works and so does the manual focus. The problem is that</p><p>
the auto focus drifts. When the first slide is focused manually the</p><p>
projector will then start to shift the focus, it won't remain in the</p><p>
sharp focus setting. It continues to drift the focus until it</p><p>
ultimately  pushes the lens completely out of the projector body. Once</p><p>
in awhile it can be focused manually and the focus will not drift but</p><p>
as soon as a slide change is made the drifting starts again. The</p><p>
slides are mounted in Gepe anti-newton glass mounts.</p><p> </p><p>
If anybody has any info that can help me out with this problem or</p><p>
knows someone or a place that can help please reply to this message.</p><p> </p><p>
Thanks much..........John</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">88214</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2003 23:43:26 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Sekonic Apex L-218 Exposure Meter Problem</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/682148-sekonic-apex-l-218-exposure-meter-problem/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I've got a Sekonic Apex L-218 exposure meter which came with a job lot of oldphoto stuff from the auction site. The problem is that the battery cap just turns freely without unscrewing from the body. I assume it's a screw fitting rather than bayonet style? I tried to open the back by removing the central screw, but it's also retained by the cap, so you can't open the back with the battery cap in position.
</p>

<p>
	Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
</p>

<p>
	PS - there was also a Gossen Sixtar (Super Pilot in the USA) which apparently needs a 1.35 Mercury battery. I've fitted a 1.5V cell and surprisingly the readings are accurate, and the needle goes exactly to the battery check mark when operated. Perhaps a previous owner had it adjusted, or am I just lucky?.
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">682148</guid><pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2024 13:08:28 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Phottix Odin 2 advice if possible please.</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/681830-phottix-odin-2-advice-if-possible-please/</link><description><![CDATA[<div style="color:#000000;font-size:16px;">
	I have a (Canon fit) Phottix Odin 2 and two receivers. They’ve not had a huge amount of use but all have worked fine when I have used them, however recently I realised that the auto flash zoom function does not work.
</div>

<div style="color:#000000;font-size:16px;">
	 
</div>

<div style="color:#000000;font-size:16px;">
	The AUTO option does not even appear on the transmitter’s lcd menu.
	<div>
		 
	</div>

	<div>
		Going through the Odin set up I can press the ZOOM button on the transmitter and choose any one of the flash groups, and rotate the dial from 20 to 200mm to enable M (manual) zooming and any selected flash will zoom as expected so that proves the communication between transmitter, receiver and flash is ok (and ALL other flash functions work).. 
	</div>

	<div>
		 
	</div>

	<div>
		I can take the flash off the Odin set up and simply use it as normal on top of the camera and it will zoom as expected when a lens focal length is changed. So that proves nothing is wrong with the flash or camera communication signals. 
	</div>

	<div>
		 
	</div>

	<div>
		I’ve tried several cameras and various zoom lenses (all Canon EF), and three different flashguns (all Canon)  and cannot get any auto zoom function. I’ve ensured the flashes themselves are set to Auto zoom so thats not the problem either.
	</div>

	<div>
		 
	</div>

	<div>
		I’ve removed the Odin and done a reset and removed and replaced the batteries but I still cannot set Auto on the zoom function on the transmitter lcd. 
	</div>

	<div>
		 
	</div>

	<div>
		Oddly the LCD menu display does not show the Auto (zoom) as an option as the manual states it should in the list of Zoom function.
	</div>

	<div>
		 
	</div>

	<div>
		However diving into various Phottix online manuals I’ve found very conflicting advice, with one manual saying <strong><em>“unlike Odin 1 system there is no auto zoom feature, flash zoom must be adjusted manually, it will not change as lens focal distance is changed.”</em></strong> whilst another states the opposite, and even (very helpfully!) shows a picture of the AUTO option in the lcd display! See enclosed screen grabs, highlights in yellow are mine.
	</div>

	<div>
		 
	</div>

	<div>
		Any suggestions what’s going on? Have I pressed something inadvertently thats screwed this up?
	</div>

	<div>
		 
	</div>

	<div>
		<img class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="1028171" data-ratio="75.00" width="1500" alt="Screenshot2024-11-18at09_46_40.jpg.12e35d85b2bdfc0ea598139d0cc5e84d.jpg" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/l323473/monthly_2024_11/Screenshot2024-11-18at09_46_40.jpg.12e35d85b2bdfc0ea598139d0cc5e84d.jpg" src="https://www.photo.net/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" />
	</div>
</div>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">681830</guid><pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2024 11:27:14 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Retro Softboxes...</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/552273-retro-softboxes/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	The other day I decided to assemble my Photogenic 2X3' Softbox. For the first time in 5 years I was able to assemble this Softbox in less than 15 minutes. This is why I hardly ever put it up ! This Softbox uses Velcro to attach the inner diffusion baffle and the outer diffusion panel. This Velcro is not your typical Velcro you get at Home Depot. It is really strong and gives shape to the entire Softbox. This made me wonder; I'm pretty sure that Softboxes were used prior to Velcro ? As far as I know Velcro is pretty recent technology. So what did photographers use back in the day to attach the diffusion panels to the Softboxes, or how where these Softboxes assembled ?       
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">552273</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 16:45:59 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Ozeck lenses ?</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/270899-ozeck-lenses/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>Probably 3rd party lenses, any information about those, especially the Super </p><p>
Ozeck II MC 28-100 mm f3.5\5.5 will be appreciated. Thanks.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">270899</guid><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:24:09 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>iPhone camera lens protectors?</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/681773-iphone-camera-lens-protectors/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	My wife and I recently purchased the new iPhone 16 Pros, primarily as an upgrade to the cameras so that we can get the best mobile pictures we can while on vacations with the kids.
</p>

<p>
	I am incredibly torn over using any sort of lens protectors on the cameras.  I understand the arguments for and against protection, but I am also concerned with any diminished photo quality.  <br />
	Does anyone have experience with using protectors on their iPhone cameras that can share a bit how photo quality was or was not impacted?  Thank you.
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">681773</guid><pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2024 14:10:52 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Mystery item - Fuji holder/insert?</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/513415-mystery-item-fuji-holderinsert/</link><description><![CDATA[<p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="//media.invisioncic.com/l323473/monthly_2018_03/fujipc1.jpg.26d298dbc1d91e59a826aafb624c2ec3.jpg" data-fileid="769150" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="769150" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="fujipc1.thumb.jpg.d170c668fac22c4dd3aa4d126c240f0c.jpg" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/l323473/monthly_2022_10/fujipc1.thumb.jpg.d170c668fac22c4dd3aa4d126c240f0c.jpg" src="https://www.photo.net/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a> <a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="//media.invisioncic.com/l323473/monthly_2018_03/fujipc2.jpg.65fa4bbe660984fd1691fe259d02383e.jpg" data-fileid="769151" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="769151" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="fujipc2.thumb.jpg.15fc4d7bc22e0b92c2142563ea79c416.jpg" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/l323473/monthly_2022_10/fujipc2.thumb.jpg.15fc4d7bc22e0b92c2142563ea79c416.jpg" src="https://www.photo.net/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a> </p><p> </p><p>
Anyone know what this Fuji accessory is used for? Thank you/Brian</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">513415</guid><pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2018 08:01:47 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Arca-Swiss Z1 Lever Lock w/RRS and Kirk Plates</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/647235-arca-swiss-z1-lever-lock-wrrs-and-kirk-plates/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I have an Arca-Swiss B1 with the screw lock that has served me faithfully for years, and I have no intention of retiring it.
</p>

<p>
	For a few reasons, though, I'm looking to complement it with second AS ball head. I'd have no hesitation about buying a second B1, but I know the Z1 is newer, improved, and has some compelling features(even if I've not found the B1 lacking).
</p>

<p>
	I've found a fair deal on a used Z1, but it comes with a lever lock. I know AS is adamant about only using their plates with ball heads, but their selection is also limited. Most of my cameras have RRS plates or L brackets with a few Kirks mixed in, and all of my big lenses with replacable feet have feet from these companies(2x RRS, 1x Kirk). I do have a few generic no-name AS plates, although my use of them is pretty limited. I don't think my X-T5 has ever been on a tripod, but I have a Smallrig grip on it that has an AS-compatible dovetail in the bottom.
</p>

<p>
	I know that basically any dovetail plate I drop in my B1 will fit and be secure as long as I either slide it in or open it up wide enough that both sides drop down into it, and then of course tighten it up enough.
</p>

<p>
	The manual for the Z1 of course is adamant that only AS brand plates be used, and does not cover whether or not there there are any available adjustments. I've been reading on and off the past day across old threads on this site and elsewhere, and some reference adjusting the lever clamp and others talk about swapping it out completely for an RRS clamp.
</p>

<p>
	Can anyone speak directly to the compatibility of RRS and Kirk plates, feet, and L Brackets with the lever lock Z1 plate?
</p>

<p>
	If there's an issue with them, I'll just get another B1 with a screw lock. I'm a bit afraid to try, though-my B1 is one of the revised ones(gray tension knob) that's supposed to be less prone to locking up, and mine never has on me. I hate to throw a second into the equation, though, know the possibility is there.
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">647235</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 19:57:12 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Paper tissue for cleaning lenses/filters?</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/588715-paper-tissue-for-cleaning-lensesfilters/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I remember back in the day (1980s) i used a special paper tissue (dampened with alcohol) to clean my lenses and filters, with very good results. After a long <a href="https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/588714-old-time-film-photographer-back-in-the-saddle/#comment-5864792" rel="">hiatus</a> away from photography, I'm having a hard time finding anything similar. I got <a href="https://www.amazon.ca/Professional-Camera-Cleaning-Kit-Cameras/dp/B00MHGOGUK/ref=sr_1_5?crid=3JAWSYYYD2ITE&amp;dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.uC6bhqLPAWNc4jfdpO8VHmRuT8G_TxACY9YH6THx4HtaRvx1EpywvXwRd0qgq4-_0LV8j0X7fWMiOseKVOWPWgMIvw_LIx4vl0cEFejkwKJ328pTvZ1CHQ12zJMb_zyxwtWwFOQwtM-TR8ZyTLHpAoOqT4BSb-ulet7Bqfjm48fwAXPmgK1rV7dJ9ePASJt4sC6ooSeH_n4VEOGpCztrO7RGJwSnLsMyNboSBRUWq2GteMPylKd4EQbwvlRiTFFLodI-PxYrCQOTzgG-gC5Q2w6_0KKxnTeawbpEEdZg_4s.41WARSaYiTq4us4LOt0LuEIT_Q_hDi7cxycBXEUf1cM&amp;dib_tag=se&amp;keywords=photo+cleaning+tissue&amp;qid=1719593950&amp;sprefix=photo+cleaning+tissue%2Caps%2C148&amp;sr=8-5" rel="external nofollow">this</a> from Amazon, but the paper tissue included is not quite the same. It's more "paper" than tissue, it doesn't slide well on the lenses. It's prone to get "stuck" on the lens instead of gently sliding. The paper I used in the 80s had an almost fabric feel to it. I wonder if they still make it. I remember it was "Made in Germany", and it came in a small "booklet" from where the tissues were ripped off. The "cover" of the booklet was black with some red stripes, with the image of a camera on a black background.  I'm not a fan of the <span>microfiber cleaning cloths, as I find the paper-alcohol combination to be more effective against anything slightly greasy. Any suggestions of where to find good paper tissue for cleaning lenses and filters...?</span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">588715</guid><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 17:12:52 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Risk Using Non-Canon Batteries</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/614488-risk-using-non-canon-batteries/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Before I fry my Canon R5 circuitry, I want to ask if using a non-Canon battery with slightly different specs would harm my camera. Both the Canon battery and non-canon battery show 7.2 Volts, but then the numbers differ. Canon shows 2130 mAh and 16 Wh, as opposed to the other battery showing 2950 mAh and 21.24Wh. <span> </span>Has anyone used a battery with similar specs and damaged your camera? Of course I know that using Canon batteries should be my first choice, but vast price difference sure makes non-Canon batteries tempting to buy. Any negative experiences using non-Canon batteries? Thanks!
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">614488</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 18:33:38 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>ricoh xr7</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/16874-ricoh-xr7/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>I'm looking at a ricoh xr7. Does anyone have any advise on this camera model. Do you know where I can find info online</p><p>thanks</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">16874</guid><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 1998 21:49:26 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Minolta Viewfinder attachment - Autometer IVF</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/571431-minolta-viewfinder-attachment-autometer-ivf/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Just purchased a 5degree spot viewfinder for my trusty Autometer IV F. When attached it flops around on the meter head. Shouldn't it lock so it holds itself vertical etc?
</p>

<p>
	Anyone have any clues on how to repair that viewfinder? 
</p>

<p>
	Any help would be greatly appreciated 
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">571431</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 11:33:51 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>ACHIEVER 632LCD flash instructions</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/45794-achiever-632lcd-flash-instructions/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know where I might find instructions for the ACHIEVER </p><p>632LCD flash unit?</p><p> </p><p>Thanks</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">45794</guid><pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2002 21:20:04 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Any recommendations for lighting kits for product and/or portraits?</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/553495-any-recommendations-for-lighting-kits-for-product-andor-portraits/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Hi everyone,<br />
	<br />
	New to the forum! I'm trying to go from photographic hobbyist to professional, bit by bit and I want to invest in good flash lighting kits for a beginner (my studio is essentially my living room with thick curtains drawn closed).<br />
	<br />
	Any suggestions or ideas? <a href="https://www.amazon.es/Antecedentes-Paraguas-Iluminaci%C3%B3n-Continua-Fotograf%C3%ADa/dp/B01JRYJ9HY/ref=asc_df_B01JRYJ9HY/?tag=googshopes-21&amp;linkCode=df0&amp;hvadid=167153087646&amp;hvpos=&amp;hvnetw=g&amp;hvrand=5985881676607677001&amp;hvpone=&amp;hvptwo=&amp;hvqmt=&amp;hvdev=c&amp;hvdvcmdl=&amp;hvlocint=&amp;hvlocphy=9181162&amp;hvtargid=pla-284960651738&amp;psc=1&amp;mcid=adc306b002e83b679b12db0761c4ab5f" rel="external nofollow">Is this a good one for example?</a> If not, how come and any suggestions for a better kit?<br />
	<br />
	Best,<br />
	<br />
	<span style="color:#3498db;">[REMOVED]</span><br />
	 
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">553495</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 13:04:10 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>B+W polirazing filter explanation and Marumi experience</title><link>https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/465144-bw-polirazing-filter-explanation-and-marumi-experience/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>&lt;p&gt;After seeing Polarizing filters test on lenstip where &lt;em&gt;B+W Slim KSM C-POL MRC and Marumi DHG Super Circular&lt;/em&gt; are rated as best I im interested in buying one of those in 77mm diameter. Since Marumi is equally good but cheaper, does anybody have experience with it? According to ebay customer reviews, they are very good.&lt;br&gt;</p><p>However with B+W filter is what confuses me and can't find enough information about it. First confusion is price. BHphoto sells them (77mm &lt;a href="<a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?atclk=Circular+Sizes_77mm&amp;ci=115&amp;N=4077634526+4291599900+4294954537+4294955264" rel="external nofollow">http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?atclk=Circular+Sizes_77mm&amp;ci=115&amp;N=4077634526+4291599900+4294954537+4294955264"&gt;link</a>)&lt;/a&gt; in a range of 100-200 $ (depending on version) and Schneider optics &lt;a href="<a href="https://www.schneideroptics.com/Ecommerce/CatalogSubCategoryDisplay.aspx?CID=530" rel="external nofollow">https://www.schneideroptics.com/Ecommerce/CatalogSubCategoryDisplay.aspx?CID=530"&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;,</a> which is wholesale, sells it in a range 300-500$! Another confusing thing is mount. Schneider optics offers next mounts:&lt;br&gt;</p><p>- &lt;a  href="<a href="https://www.schneideroptics.com/Ecommerce/CatalogSubCategoryDisplay.aspx?CID=692" rel="external nofollow">https://www.schneideroptics.com/Ecommerce/CatalogSubCategoryDisplay.aspx?CID=692"&gt;Standard</a> F-Pro Mount&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</p><p>- &lt;a  href="<a href="https://www.schneideroptics.com/Ecommerce/CatalogSubCategoryDisplay.aspx?CID=1818" rel="external nofollow">https://www.schneideroptics.com/Ecommerce/CatalogSubCategoryDisplay.aspx?CID=1818"&gt;XS-Pro</a> Digital Mount&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</p><p>- &lt;a  href="<a href="https://www.schneideroptics.com/Ecommerce/CatalogSubCategoryDisplay.aspx?CID=736" rel="external nofollow">https://www.schneideroptics.com/Ecommerce/CatalogSubCategoryDisplay.aspx?CID=736"&gt;Slim-Line</a> Mount&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</p><p>Which one do I need for the use mostly on Nikkor 10-24 DX lens? Seems that Slim line is the slimmest but doesn't have front thread, which means it is not possible to attach another filter in front of it. Am I correct?&lt;br&gt;</p><p>That opens new question about ND filter which I also want to buy, probably Hoya NDx400. Does anybody use ND in combination and if so, I guess it comes on top of CPL? Also, what about stacking linear polarizing in front of CPL to reduce amount of light? Can't decide is it better to have one ND filter, or Liner polarizer to get variable ND reduction?&lt;br&gt;</p><p>I know the best thing is to have whole bunch of accessories but can't afford it so I'm trying to make best possible combination which I can afford. Thanks for help.&lt;/p&gt;</p><p>&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">465144</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:24:59 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
