Canon EOS Mount
49,309 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 41 views
-
- 7 replies
- 180 views
-
- 9 replies
- 477 views
-
- 8 replies
- 247 views
-
- 1 reply
- 118 views
-
- 2 replies
- 119 views
-
- 15 replies
- 398 views
-
- 6 replies
- 281 views
-
- 4 replies
- 268 views
-
- 6 replies
- 887 views
-
- 7 replies
- 327 views
-
- 6 replies
- 410 views
-
- 7 replies
- 440 views
-
- 6 replies
- 367 views
-
- 5 replies
- 453 views
-
- 2 replies
- 312 views
-
- 7 replies
- 603 views
-
- 5 replies
- 412 views
-
- 15 replies
- 635 views
-
- 6 replies
- 423 views
-
- 5 replies
- 471 views
-
- 4 replies
- 525 views
-
- 0 replies
- 331 views
-
- 1 reply
- 776 views
-
- 6 replies
- 498 views
(800x800).thumb.jpg.c94833d6ea93605f47351873a94fc0cc.jpg)
-
Who's Online 19 Members, 0 Anonymous, 739 Guests (See full list)
-
Recent Gallery Images
-
Recent Forum Wide Posts
-
By Bill Blackwell Images · Posted
Cabrillo Marine Aquarium, San Pedro, CA -
Old cottage - Franka Solida Model 1 folding 6x6 camera - Kodak Pro 160 -
-
-
By Tom Fuldner · Posted
Hi Niels, Really eager to know your experience using the waist level finder for the Nikon F2. I often find myself shooting location portraits with a 28mm lens where I try to keep the verticals “vertical” in the background. This means I am often positioning the camera below eye level. With an eye-level prism finder, this can be a bit tedious and uncomfortable. I’ve been using a flip up eyepiece magnifier to confirm focus. This is also tedious because I can’t see the subject’s full face when the magnifier is flipped down. So, does the magnifier in the waist level finder provide the best of both: a full-screen view of the ground glass with sufficient magnification to make focusing on the subject’s eyes easy? Many thanks in advance for your reply. Tom
-
