Norman 202
-
Posts
2,250 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by Norman 202
-
studland<div></div>
-
well, i didn't know lightroom had camera profiles so thanks, Marc, for pointing this out and thanks, Andrew, for the link.
-
colourful car<div></div>
-
umdedum<div></div>
-
new size<div></div>
-
<i>Or, no, I think maybe it's norman's inner fart aimed in my general direction</i> <p> grow up, ffs. if you can't handle alternative definitions of abstract photographs to your own maybe you should be more specific.<div></div>
-
harrumph. it's a smudge on the glass through which i made the abstraction, if you don't mind. but thanks for noticing.
-
in my view all photos are abstract, so here's one of mine<div></div>
-
excellent post. i'd love to see some examples and i promise not to plagiarise* *crosses fingers behind back
-
the best jokes have a punchline and the effect is immediate and most people wouldn't want to hear the same joke twice (unless they didn't get it first time). the best photos, imho, don't have a punchline, the effect is not immediate and they can be viewed many times.
-
Can you refer to a series as a work of art?
Norman 202 replied to elli_perkins's topic in Casual Photo Conversations
bear in mind that most galleries present art as a body of work either as a retrospective of someone or a particular genre -
<i>Are there any objective criteria that apply to the evaluation of abstract photographs</i> <p> many(as in the case with normal photos). the number of regular polygons visible in the photo, for example. but do we really want objective criteria?
-
woof<div></div>
-
35mm Focal equivalent for metrogon cameras
Norman 202 replied to s_f_c's topic in Casual Photo Conversations
in answer to your first question, you can talk about 35mm equivalent focal lengths in the film world but people rarely, if ever, did -
35mm Focal equivalent for metrogon cameras
Norman 202 replied to s_f_c's topic in Casual Photo Conversations
from wikipedia <p> <i>According to CIPA guidelines[2] 35 mm equivalent focal length are to be calculated like this: “Converted focal length into 35mm camera” = Diagonal distance of image area in the 35mm camera (43.27mm) / Diagonal distance of image area on the image sensor of the DSC × focal length of the lens of the DSC.</i> <p> so the crop factor of your camera is 43.27/(229xsqrt(2)) = 43.27/323.85 = 0.1336 <p> which gives a 35mm equiv focal length of approximately 20mm (153.86 x 0.1336) -
morning<div></div>
-
um-di-dum<div></div>
-
i'd love to look at photos in another time with real people
-
smile<div></div>
-
Jeff, interesting character and great photo. You always make the best out of difficult lighting conditions
-
i used the 10D with an adapter from cameraquest and a contax-yashica 2.8/35. i liked that combo. i didn't do much manual focussing through the viewfinder but relied on hyperfocal distance
-
a bit early this week<div></div>
-
07-10<div></div>
-
i agree with Richard. the photogs site is much more sympathetic.
-
rich man, poor man, beggar man, thief. does it really make any difference?
