yockenwaithe

<p>Alright cats, I'm getting my d7100 today! Thanks for all the input<br> Ian- I'm going to try that out and see if it works! If it does, I may gift the camera to my sister [she's taking up photography and a DSLR would be good for her to practice]</p>

<p>I just order the $600 7100 from Adorama- I've got quite enough lenses for my cameras at the minute anyhow, but in the future lenses are a top priority if I need more</p>

<p>The only reason the 7200 was in consideration was that I've used it before- so I had experience. From what I've been told the two pretty much feel the same so I went with the cost factor over and small improvements the 7200 has<br> I usually wait for the coolest new toys to come out before buying because the 'old' digital cameras usually drop a little in price [i.e. if the 7300 were to come out], but in this case it's sort of necessitated by the death of my camera sensor- which happens to be the only digital camera I own</p>

<p>That's why I was considering the Df- I'm quite quick at using adjusting the settings on film cameras but cannot for the life of me do it quickly at all on a DSLR [excepting manual focusing, which I'm still pretty fast at]<br> That being said I've decided to wait on full frame for a bit, until I have more money to do so [or desperately need a larger sensor, which at the moment I don't]</p>

<p>The d90 I have has started getting bright red artifacts on a majority of the pictures- and the price of the body doesn't seem like it's worth it to fix any sensor issues. It has been heavily used both before and after I got it so things like that are apparently to be expected. <br> I did get a medium format- it is for portraiture only [where the few clients I do get demand high quality pictures], the digital camera is for everything else <br> I'll be probably getting the d7100 all things considered, I don't generally shoot machine gun style or use high ISO very often, so the price seems to speak for itself. If I want a full frame I'll probably get one when I have some deeper pockets<br> Thanks all for the input!</p>

<p>So I've got an old Nikon D90, and the artifacts have started coming in hot and heavy on the pictures. I'm having a hard time deciding between the d7100 and the d7200- from what I've seen the 7200 is just an upgraded 7100, so doesn't seem worth the several hundred dollar hike. On the other hand, I've used a 7200 and am quite impressed with the image quality. The comparison sites online aren't much help either.<br> Long story short, is it worth saving several months to get a 7200 or just get a 7100?<br> Alternatively the Df looks like a pretty sexy camera, and full frame has been something I've been wanting for a while now</p>

<p>How about the new hasselblad h5d-200c? It takes great pictures! And on the plus side you'll have no more house to tie you down! It's a win-win no?</p>

<p>I'd recommend Google Chrome, it tends to handle ads better</p>

<p>The mid zoom is probably Kamaro, the only good third party lens maker I can think of is Cosina for the rest, worth looking into at least</p>

<p>If you're looking for a film camera a Yashica Electro GNS is probably best. For digital like Robin said- a Canon Rebel is easy to pick up and use and good enough quality</p>

<p>If you're standing you might want to try an uber wide lens [in the area of 20ish mm], with a larger format [medium at least I'd think] so you can crop it without too much loss of resolution<br> Just an idea, not sure how well it would work</p>

<p>Put them in a file, and either choose to 'compress' [change it into a .zip file] or just change the size of the files themselves. Using .zip files is the easiest way to send photos over email though in my experience</p>

<p>I have a film casette with the original film in it, I looked them up and there are a few people on ebay selling them. That being said you still need to put film in them somehow. They've got a sort of unique, grainy look to them; sort of how people think 'film' looks, so it's worth using at least once in my opinion</p>

<p>What film is it? I know when I'm shooting some Fuji films and there's a light leak the entire photo is green tinged. Maybe the lab thought it was ortho film and used a safe light? That is very strange</p>

<p>I use one, it works pretty nicely as long as you use the brush first [duh]</p>

<p>https://www.cameraquest.com/ltmnum.htm<br> Based on this chart a Leica II</p>

<p>I have used a welta but once myself, and I can say they are quite fun to use, and pretty easy to repair</p>

<p>I wonder how a Nikkormat would do, probably would destroy the press though</p>

<p>Seeing as it's a Compur shutter, more than likely the problem is that the lubricant has settled on the aperture blades and jammed them- it's pretty common in old Zeiss cameras [or leaf shutter cameras at all]. I'd send it to a pro, my forays into fixing a leaf shutter lens resulted in 40+ hours to fix the same problem, albeit in a more complicated Zeiss camera.<br> Hope this helps!</p>

<p>I think art [as by what is usually define it as], is aesthetic over function. Not to say it can't be used but it was not intended primarily to be used, but to be looked at</p>