Jump to content

Sports

2,188 topics in this forum

  1. One of your favorite sports photos

    By randrew1,
    • 7 replies
    • 1.2k views

  2. Agility in poor light

    By tonybeach_1961,
    • 4 replies
    • 1.8k views

  3. May I see your best soccer photo? 1 2 3

    By jason j,
    • 66 replies
    • 10.6k views

  4. Done any Field Hockey Photos?

    By Yoyi,
    • 0 replies
    • 64 views

  5. BaseBall double miss

    By john_torcasio,   
    • 0 replies
    • 103 views

  6. Croydon Ranchers

    By john_torcasio,   
    • 1 reply
    • 134 views

  7. Sport from Poland

    By dawid_gaszynski1,   
    • 12 replies
    • 4.2k views

  8. Flash duration, daylight, freeze action

    By laichungleung,
    • 10 replies
    • 1.4k views

  9. Sebring Car Races

    By Eric W,   
    • 18 replies
    • 3.9k views

  10. Capture the Moment

    By Sandy Vongries,
    • 21 replies
    • 4.7k views

  11. Was a flash necessary for night football games in 1959

    By chas7557,
    • 16 replies
    • 2.2k views

  12. Canon 400mm 2.8 III worth extra $3,000

    By tonyyoung,
    • 5 replies
    • 1.2k views

  13. Night Sports - what lens to use?

    By mikeclark,   
    • 24 replies
    • 8.6k views

  14. 70-200mm 2.8 for soccer

    By HangTime,
    • 3 replies
    • 2.6k views

  15. Cleaning up noise is dimly lit gymasiums

    By craig_morton,
    • 15 replies
    • 2.4k views

  16. Hockey Talk

    By stevefrey,
    • 11 replies
    • 1.5k views

  17. Canon T2i and Canon 70-200 2.8 for football

    By qcgraphx,   
    • 11 replies
    • 2.5k views

  18. Possbile NFL Sideline Chance

    By ed_farmer,
    • 10 replies
    • 1.8k views

  19. Photographing a golf tournament

    By www.philwinterphotography.,
    • 9 replies
    • 1.7k views

  20. Panning racers

    By tcyin,
    • 3 replies
    • 1.6k views

  21. What have you been shooting lately?

    By randrew1,
    • 16 replies
    • 2.6k views

  22. Autofocus techniques

    By randrew1,
    • 6 replies
    • 2.2k views

  23. Missed Opportunities

    By DavidTriplett,
    • 8 replies
    • 1.8k views

  24. Guide to photographing basketball

    By dr._karl_hoppe,
    • 12 replies
    • 2.4k views

  25. FAST glass wins

    By Gary Naka,
    • 5 replies
    • 1.6k views

  • Recent Gallery Images

  • Recent Forum Wide Posts

    • Ricochetrider
      Please Critique This Photo

      By Ricochetrider · Posted

      Thanks to everyone for the comments. here’s more of the back story: So we were popping about the SW corner of England, hanging out for a couple weeks in County Cornwall with several friends. Mucking about one afternoon in this little village, walking off a mid day meal of fish & chips, we came across this super colorful house with the “convenient” bench out front.   I would have just shot the house/building/shop, in fact was in the process of doing just that when my friends sat down on the bench. So the photo kinda became a little bit a shot of them while still mostly being a shot of the amazing scene. It didn’t really happen on purpose but in the end I love how it turned out, with them all but blending in to the crowded setting and being more a side element with the primary focus of the overall picture being everything BUT them.    I like it in its original form, telephone pole and all- I always just shoot what’s “there”; very rarely do I ever alter any scene. I don’t typically do any PP work other than auto enhancing light and sometimes levels & curves. Oh and perhaps the occasional crop.     
    • NHSN
      Cheating the Spammers

      By NHSN · Posted

      Thank you! That seems like an excellent way to crowdsource moderation.
    • digitaldog
      processing/converting to B&W in LightRoom

      By digitaldog · Posted

      You can make up a new term (non-permanent editing) to replace a well know and historically understood term (parametric editing), if you wish Joe. But the whole statement is kinda like, "Which is better for removing a brain tumor? A Black and Decker cordless screwdriver, or the thingie on Swiss Army Knives for taking stones outta horses' hooves?" Parametric editing doesn't burn anything into the original! It is used to create pixels. It doesn't push them, it only reads them as raw data.  A color print from a negative isn't much different. The neg is read only.  Adobe (and others) treat raw parametric editing as read only. Again, raw is raw and remains raw.  Yes, the rest is a workflow choice; some make better choices based on the understanding of the workflow and the data treatment, than others. 🤔
    • rodeo_joe1
      processing/converting to B&W in LightRoom

      By rodeo_joe1 · Posted

      It would better be described as non-permanent editing, since all it's doing is creating a script to 'push the pixels around' rather than immediately 'pushing them around'. (a bit of emotive word-play being used there, to make direct editing sound more crude and basic than it really is)  In the end, what's needed for nearly all purposes is an edited file in which the changes have been made permanent and baked-in (pixel-pushed or 'destructive' if you like). Since one cannot rely on a customer or printer or viewer of the file to have access to software that can read the parametric script. This drawback is clearly explained in that article.  What happens between starting file and edited end-product file is largely irrelevant unless and until all image editing/viewing/printing software settles on a standardised script and sidecar format - and that's probably never going to happen. So, no editing method is truly 'destructive' unless the camera original file is lost, deleted or overwritten. The rest is just a workflow choice.   
    • TGOPS
      Copyright Complaint (renamed)

      By TGOPS · Posted

      Per your request, we have removed that title from your account.
×
×
  • Create New...