Jump to content

Larry_G1664882113

PhotoNet Pro
  • Posts

    6,902
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Larry_G1664882113

  1. Kamala, This image really pops and has great colors. The land separator in the middle of the image is key to the composition. Nice reflection. HDR? Larry
  2. Larry_G1664882113

    Memorials

    I took this inside the Notre Dame Cathedral in Montreal. It is not exactly a street image, but there is not a category for documentary. Please comment. Larry
  3. Emmanuel, This is an excellent candid. It's a bit soft on focus, but just fine. Wonderful capture. I assume you are referring to the Sanders party being over. It is too bad. Larry
  4. Emmanuel, Thanks for your visit and comment. There's often the urge to add saturation and color to images. I am trying to keep them natural without too much contrast. In this one I think the earthy tones of the bricks are important as is the variety and repetition in the different brick designs. Thanks, again. Larry
  5. Alf, I keep going back to Ansel Adams' statement that there are at least 2 people in every image, the photographer and the viewer. It's the viewer that makes or breaks the image. Thanks for the wonderful reaction. Larry
  6. Larry_G1664882113

    Boat in Arrecife

    Eystein, I like this image a lot. You managed the composition well. While the rowboat is the main subject in the foreground, it effectively leads the eye through the image. The bright light between the water and sky is most unusual. You seem to have captured it just short of its being blown out, good. The light brightening from the water beyond the breakwater sends the message that the sea goes on and on. The image grows on me as I continue to look at it. Larry
  7. Larry_G1664882113

    Birds

    Eystein, This is great. You captured the birds so well. They have both excellent detail and appropriate blur. Nice shot. Larry
  8. Eystein, Thanks for your visit and comment. I was reviewing some images I hadn't posted and decided to share this one. I appreciate your endorsement. Larry
  9. David, Thanks for your apt advice. I will practice night shots whenever I can get away from the city. Obviously, it won't be the Aurora, but at least I can practice getting the focus correct and experiment with different shutter speeds. Just practicing using the camera in the dark will be a plus. I will happily post any successes online at PN. Thanks again. Larry
  10. Eystein, Many thanks for your visit and comment. Communicating and dealing with this new site is so complicated. I think I miss many images because of the site. Thanks again. Larry
  11. The majesty of this cathedral speaks for itself. Your comments are appreciated. Larry
  12. Gregory and Verena, Excuse my tardy reply. I have been having difficulty negotiating and using this new site, garumph. This image was taken from the Stone Arch Bridge close to the Main Street side. The hiking trail was roped off due to slippery conditions, but that attracts people, right? I appreciate your comment. Thanks. Larry
  13. Glenn, I really like your last post of the Milky Way. Can you share the exif data and the location? David, your first image with the red cliff and tree is quite good. I will be going to Alaska and will be on an Arctic Circle day trip to photograph the Northern Lights. I have been reading Patrick Endres' e-book, How to Photograph the Northern Lights. It's superb and he's most helpful. I purchased a 16mm f2.0 lens for the Aurora. Any other tips you can send my way? Thanks. Larry
  14. I recently saw this quotation which seems appropriate here - “Skill in photography is acquired by practice and not by purchase.” Percy W. Harris Larry
  15. You keep saying that you respond to my questions, but I either don't get your responses or you refer me to some thread I can't find. There doesn't seem to be a place to search threads.
  16. Thanks, Holger. I think we see images in a similar way. Your comment is right on. Larry
  17. I have been a PN subscriber for 10 years, although the new site only credits me with nine, I suggest you listen to the frustration of your membership with this clumsy and difficult to negotiate site. The old site was user friendly. It was easy to communicate with PN peers. This site seems to be all glitz and no practical functionality. I have waited a while to complain, giving the site a chance with no avail. I have asked a few times for help in how to create new gallery folders and never got a response. I requested feed back for my comments, but not feedback for each of my PN colleagues that I follow. You clutter up my inbox. This site appears to have been set up for the PN administration to sell images, not with adequate attention and respect for the needs of your subscribers who keep the site in business. For now, I am sticking with PN because I value the connections I have made and expand with other photographers. To me PN is a learning and sharing opportunity. Unless you take measures to make the site user friendly as it was before, you will lose many of us. I suggest you read and heed the other negative responses from subscribers also. I'd like to know what you are planning to do to make the site more usable. Thanks.
  18. Larry_G1664882113

    Opaekaa Falls

    I also captured closer up images and vertical images of Opaekaa Falls, but this one tells communicates the landscape to me. Your comments are appreciated. Thanks. Larry
  19. Bob and JDM, Thanks for your input. You confirm my sense. Getting the best exposure in camera using ISO normally seems best and then tweaking it in Camera RAW in post is my procedure. I think I will stick with it. Bob, I will look at Lee Varis' book. We always need to learn more. Thanks to you both. Larry
  20. Tony, I assume that rooms are $5.00 per night. Nice image. You likely chose to have the poles slant inward and to have the buildings lean back. Larry
  21. Net R Thanks for your response and for the attached link. It is good to know that the D7000 is ISO invariant. I don't agree that I can get usable results straight away from the camera's display because as I have noted above, the images would likely be too underexposed. I couldn't understand the numbers in the chart you attached. Thanks, again. Larry
  22. Josvan, I agree that it is the quality of the image as captured that matters most. With this invariance ISO, the captured images in the camera are likely to be grossly underexposed. The original capture on the camera's screen, as I understand it. would not be too useful for measuring the image's quality because it will be way too dark. This is why I want to get real experience from others who have used this technique. Thanks for reading my post and for your response. Larry
  23. I just read a couple of Internet blurbs about ISO invariance. What is your experience with this? Would or do you trust that adding exposure in post processing will result in images as good or better than those created using ISO at the appropriate setting for the light conditions for your images? I've included one article on ISO invariance for your perusal. I use a Nikon D7000. I'm more than a little skeptical about this. I appreciate your input. Larry http://improvephotography.com/34818/iso-invariance/
  24. Larry_G1664882113

    Sundown

    Holger, Thanks, my friend. Someday I'll start carrying around a camera. It is at the abstract quality that I think is important too. Thanks for your visit. Larry
  25. Larry_G1664882113

    Sundown

    The sky and strip of yellow sunset caught my eye with only an iPhone to record the moment. It was gone as soon as I pocketed the device. Your opinions are appreciated. Thanks. Larry
×
×
  • Create New...