d_gillespie
-
Posts
615 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Image Comments posted by d_gillespie
-
-
Intense colors to say the least. I think the foreground log in the water may need some counter-point or balancing elements. The signature is way to big, let the image speak for you. -
I like the feel of the composition but the soft focus takes something away. -
You have really caused a lot of trouble for all of us amateur picture takers. The iconic shot of a zebra is required for every nature photographer who wants to be taken seriously. It used to be as simple as heading to the local zoo and raising our camera up to snap a couple of frames of the local beasts. We print them on nice paper hang them on the wall and everybody thinks we are pros. Now what are we supposed to do?
Great shot, really makes us all work that much harder.
-
This is a beautiful concept and composition. Having a family member (who makes wedding gowns) would make sure I shot from the other side so the zipper pull would not show. On a button up dress there is no zipper. The puckering of the fabric along the zipper and the dart could be smoother as well. Tiny criticisms for a lovely picture. -
I can't decide of the little red car bugs me or not. I would suggest a little work on the sky to bring out some of the color, either with a filter or in post.
-
Nice composition and tonal range. My first impression was the scene was slightly tilted but I am think this is more of an optical illusion instead of a shifter vertical alignment. The far center mountain does go a little muddy in contrast to the sharp contrast of the foreground trees. Mostly a distance issue I think. Another small thought, on an otherwise nice image, would be to darken the sky to reveal more to the clouds.
-
-
With your title the image may have been stronger if you had chosen to use a landscape orientation. This would give the three subjects some room to extend their gaze off to the horizon. It seems they just need some more room on the left side of this shot.
-
Welcome to PN. If you haven't taken the opportunity to look at many of the highly rated nature and bird photographs I would suggest you take a look. There are many fine examples of shot similar to the one you have attempted here. Several suggestions: get to know your camera well enough to take this picture without thinking, work on developing your eye for composition, look at different angles from which to shoot this type of picture and make sure the focus is tight when shooting this type of scene. Best of luck. -
I really enjoy this image, and not because you took my suggestion - it has a quality of light that is difficult to capture. Nicely done.
-
C/C welcomed. -
Not knowing the story of this subject I do not wish to start a flame contest. It just feels a little wrong.
-
-
With such a symmetrical image I feel cheated to have the logo stuck at the bottom center of this nice image. Its almost a slap in the face. It doesn't need it in my opinion.
-
Nice image, lots and lots of text. Wish I could just enjoy the nice photograph. -
-
That's what they mean when the talk about 3D and great depth of field. Now I get it. Cool.
-
Are you sure this is the right category? Nice shot. -
-
This is an image that is well suited for some HRD manipulation. I have seen several images similar to this one where details of the inside of the covered bridge were brought out and the background remained as colorful and saturated. There are folks who have achieved something similar by manipulating the curves functions in some of the PP software. Enjoyable composition, I would like some tighter focus on the central house, it seems the focus is on the boards near the end of the bridge.
-
-
The mannequin in the center is striking, but the inclusion of the large sign behind here and out of focus really takes away from some of the intrigue. At first glance we may think the subject is real, but the fuzzy sign quickly takes away that illusion. I suggest reshooting or cropping with just the plastic chicks.
-
-
As a portrait we mean the instrument? The idea seems solid, simple even stark with the female subject, soft curves of the instrument (bass violin?) but the decision to crop her head and to have the naked leg wander off frame and also be cropped may not be the most supportive decisions for this shot. I like the contrast of the monochromatic stone and the wood and skin tones, I feel the framing/ cropping choices were not the best.
Dog Walk
in Animal
Posted