![](http://content.invisioncic.com/l323473/set_resources_2/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
d_gillespie
-
Posts
615 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Image Comments posted by d_gillespie
-
-
I like this composition, I have difficulty with the muted tones, its seems all to muddy. I suggest some minor adjustments in the brightness.
-
-
With an image like this with so many vertical elements in regular spacing it is a real compositional challenge. Being almost in the center can be more distracting that being off center by enough to ensure it was planned. I would suggest that the alignment is so close it is worth a return to shot a second time and get it completely true, or move enough to one side to give a different perspective.
-
With such nice focus, DOF and controlled lighting I wonder why there was the desire to add a fuzzy matte frame? Seems contradictory.
-
Tough call, the blue is a great balance for the browns and yellows, maybe a lower angle, almost on the ground may give enough sky and stretch the horizon?
-
-
I may challenge the position of the truck, would it be better more to the right allowing for a sense of potential to the left? Also was any thought given to landscape orientation vs. portrait? Interesting.
-
-
-
-
-
It is exceptionally difficult to shoot at the sun and achieve any success, bravo, this image works for several reason, composition, color, balance I assume learned through experience. I really have only one criticism and that is the framing and the artist's signature, I just don't care for this distraction. Nice work.
-
What a fantastic sky. The noise in the image is too distracting. Great composition.
-
-
-
I guess the question for me is about the lamp post, vertical, shops and the lens flare? I like the composition but what is not interesting - to me - are the shops at the bottom. With the challenge of maintain a vertical datum with a very tall building there have to be compromises. I tend to like the lamp post as a balance to the building, I don't care for the lens flare. Interesting.
-
-
I agree the composition and ideas are interesting. Is there a higher resolution version that can be posted? I really like the idea, but the distraction of focus may be too much to overcome.
-
Excellent lighting and interesting composition. The focus for me is too soft, or perhaps this was hand held - in that case I would try a mono-pod or tripod for stability.
-
I almost didn't notice the three subjects on the right side. If they are important, and by the title I assume they are, should they be given a little more attention? I also think the angle of this shot could be lower.
-
It has the ability to be a striking image, but the lack of sharp focus on the house really take away from the shot, for me at least.
-
-
This almost looks like a travel snapshot where you can show people where you had lunch or what your hotel looked like. The empty bench and light post have some potential to tell a story but the trees and building are too strong and those simple objects can't compete with that much "noise". The face of the limestone building on the left is a little overexposed near the top. Perhaps this might work better with different framing or cropping.
-
This is definitely one for the "How did they do that?" folder. I am guessing bicycles, no they would be smoother, people walking? or maybe lots of underpaid photographic assistants with flashlights.
Untitled
in Flower
Posted