Jump to content

Norman 202

PhotoNet Pro
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,250

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Norman 202

  1. Norman 202
    I just downloaded the ios app and started a 1 week free trial but RF’s film isn’t available.
  2. Norman 202
    venus- i think :-)
  3. Norman 202

    Wind

    Norman 202 replied to Mike Marcotte's topic in No Words

  4. Norman 202
    nighty-night
  5. Norman 202
  6. Norman 202
  7. Norman 202
    and that will change rapidly. i, hope, that google et al will soon make the 35 mm ff sensor and a 1.4 lens redundant. but that’s a whole new can of worms (in terms of aesthetics) edit: well, actually, it isn’t as almost all of the world’s best photos were shot with apertures less than f/2
  8. Norman 202
    Phil, perfectly put. Cellphone technology is changing rapidly and the OP should become familiar with the ergonomics of them as, to me, that is one area I struggle with.
  9. Norman 202
    Fred, Oscar Wilde would’ve appreciated that.
  10. Norman 202

    Unexpected

    Norman 202 replied to Jon Eckman's topic in No Words

  11. Norman 202
    Happy Phriday everyone. Here’s my offering for the week. I’m still experimenting with the sq format.
  12. Norman 202
  13. Norman 202
    ricoh gr I (~28mm)
  14. Norman 202
    Al, lighten up. Cartoons have been proved to improve the quality of life unlike your depressing, cliched, crap (only kidding :-) )
  15. Norman 202
    This is just another sensational article from the cash strapped, eu loving, clinton worshipping guardian. Read the following and work out how the sub came up with the title of the article Today, what entranced Joel Meyerowitz about the street is all but dead. “Nobody’s looking at each other. Everybody’s glued to their phones.” But street photography still exists? “It’s thriving but not in the way I used to do it. The best street photographers now show humans dwarfed by ad billboards. The street has lost its savour.”
  16. Norman 202
    Thanks, Ed. I appreciate the input.
  17. Norman 202
    i didn’t. i said it had a 28mm sq sensor meaning 28mm squared as I don’t know how to write “to the power of 2” on the internet :-)
  18. Norman 202
    Fred, this is a gear & science site for photographers, there isn’t a well recognised artist among us. And the science, and discussions thereof, are as beautiful as the images and will prevail whereas the images won’t.
  19. Norman 202
    Wouldn’t you be better off doing your post processing in a nicely lit studio?
  20. Norman 202
    And vice versa. The mathematics (science) of a subject is as meaningful & beautiful as the subject itself.
  21. Norman 202
    Just as one can’t be taught to be a Gauss, Newton or Euler, one can still be taught basic maths
  22. Norman 202
    Elite schools, Eton & Harrow, Harvard & Yale, for example, might disagree (ow they might have to drop their fees) :)
  23. Norman 202
    Thanks, Bill & Ed, for your contributions
  24. Norman 202
    they were. i’ve just looked at this site Compare digital camera sensor sizes: 1″-Type, 4/3, APS-C, full frame 35mm and it suggests the oly has a crop factor of 6 whereas the sony has a crop factor of 2.7 which suggest they are similar (12 vs 10.8) so i’ll keep my oly. but that sony is so cute.
  25. Norman 202
    A bit OT, but, If I have a sensor A that is 4 times the area of sensor B, will camera A have 4 times the light gathering power of camera B or twice the power? I want to compare the Oly tg-5 sensor size ~ 28mm sq with Rx0 sensor ~ 117 mm sq at f/2 and f/4 respectively. the oly is12mp, the sony 15mp. ignore differences due to other factors edit: both are ~ 24mm (35mm equiv) focal lengths at their widest
×
×
  • Create New...