Member Classified Ads
1,061 topics in this forum
-
- 1 reply
- 495 views
-
- 2 replies
- 627 views
-
- 9 replies
- 928 views
-
- 2 replies
- 390 views
-
- 4 replies
- 557 views
-
- 1 reply
- 482 views
-
- 1 reply
- 505 views
-
- 5 replies
- 739 views
-
- 0 replies
- 598 views
-
- 0 replies
- 403 views
-
- 2 replies
- 570 views
-
- 1 reply
- 448 views
-
- 0 replies
- 364 views
-
- 1 reply
- 441 views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 2 replies
- 663 views
-
FS: Zeiss Ikon Contessa 35 mm rangefinder camera with Zeiss Opton T coated Tessar 45mm 1:2,8 lens in
- 1 reply
- 690 views
-
- 0 replies
- 411 views
-
- 1 reply
- 493 views
-
- 0 replies
- 392 views
-
- 1 reply
- 575 views
-
- 0 replies
- 410 views
-
- 2 replies
- 521 views
-
- 0 replies
- 522 views
-
- 1 reply
- 475 views
-
Who's Online 11 Members, 1 Anonymous, 262 Guests (See full list)
-
Recent Gallery Images
-
By gregverena, -
-
-
-
-
-
Recent Forum Wide Posts
-
Unfortunately, aspect ratios are what they are. You either crop to fit the paper or leave borders to retain the original image contents. Otherwise you are depending on some sort of algorithm to change things for you, which, as you have seen, doesn't work very well most of the time. -
-
"Bottom line: if you don't want to distort a photo, the aspect ratios of the image and the paper (or the printed image on the paper) have to be the same. When you checked "maintain aspect ratio," the computer left blank areas in order not to distort the image." Yes, the last image is distorted as I was trying to point out to you. The software sort of streched the image so it could fit. If I had not uncheked the [] 'maintain aspect ratio', the image would have a space at the bottom or top. Instead of pointing out flaws, what is the solution to resolve this problem ? Why haven't software manufactures addressed this issue in 2024 ? -
-
-
