Jump to content

david_dorcich1

Members
  • Posts

    386
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by david_dorcich1

  1. You only need to have enough chemical to cover the film in the tank, but be sure that the amount of chem you are using have the capacity for the amount of film you have in the tank. This isn't usually a problem unless you are using very diluted developer. You should put an empty reel on top of the one with film if you are using a 2 reel tank with only on roll of film. This will prevent the film from moving out of the chemicals during processing.
  2. D-76 isn't a paper developer, its made for film. If paper printing is where you are seeing a problem, you might want to try using a paper developer such as Dektol.

     

    I keep D-76 is a one gallon jug and generally get about 5-6 months out of a batch assuming i don't use it all up, so you should be seeing more life out of it. How hot does it get in your storage?

  3. "If you have filters for B&W film photography, you can stack the red green and blue filters to give you a heavy duty ND filter."

     

    Once you filter light out, you can't put it back in with a filter. That would definitely not create a neutral density filter.

  4. Why carry the 18-200 when you get the 24-70? You will have 24-200 cover at f2.8, doesn't make much sense to also carry the 18-200 variable f-stop on top of that.

     

    And why carry a battery charger in a day-use bag? You might want to go through all of the gear and really look at what you actually use on a given day.

  5. You can just be sure to stop after 12th frame. You might loose some sharpness from the difference in film flatness but you can gauge that after a few rolls if you find is acceptable. You won't damage anything by trying.
  6. Requires a different pressure plate setting in the camera in order to keep the film flat, since 220 is thinner without the paper behind the film. That is why 120, and 220 film backs use different inserts. Some tlr's have a switch that moves the pressure plate to allow the use of 220 rolls.
  7. "If I was still working with film, I would be paying all those film environmental costs in addition to the technological costs of being on this site discussing the environmental costs of photography. In that sense, I think we may have a net gain with my switch to digital."

     

    You might want to look into what goes into making modern electronics. Not at all environmentally friendly. Only change is where you deal with the impact.

×
×
  • Create New...