yann_r.

Byron,<br>

I just wanted to show that it is very much easier to leave ratings than comments. I'm an example as well.<br>

Your idea would be the ideal one... in a better world : )<br>

Cheers.

<i>no complaints - just comments</i><p>

Admins,<br>

On each community member page, folders are displaying using alphabetical order

instead of sequence one (like on portfolio).<br>

Is there any reason? Couldn't it be the same (the sequence one)?<br>

Capitals are differentiated too, is it useful?

David,<p align="justify">

the guys who wrote above me are quite excellent and prolific writers. Unfortunately, I don't think they represent the majority of photo.net crowd.<p align="justify">

I personally think that it's almost as much important to reply on comments/critics I receive than to leave comments/critics on others. Simple way communication doesn't improve anything. I think that your system isn't a bad one but in any case it will allow people to communicate and to share constructive points of views.</p>

> Must each photo of a documentary be very good and have high technical value to

make a good whole report?<p>

I would be very interested to read your point of views, thanks in advance.

Familiar indeed : ) (I hadn't read the end of this thread)<br>

I think that could be a very good solution. I personnally don't care a lot that Peter, Paul or Jack gives me 3/3 or 6/6. If the average of my photo is A:3.5/O:3 or A:5/O:5.5, I understand well their meaning.