yann_r.

Do you mean on this <A HREF="http://www.photo.net/photo/4620560">page</A>?<br>

I did it without problem.<p>

I don't think the problem comes from pop-up blocker (I'm using one) but your should allow cookies.<br>

Good luck.

<div></div>

No need to be a great mind for being pretty sure that no rating system will make everybody neither fully happy nor fully unhappy with it.<i> At least the photo.net site feedback forum remains active...</i>

<p align="justify">

<i>I came out to ask myself this question because I see less and less constructive critiques on PN</i><br>

That's a truth. The simplest way - and maybe the only one - to receive constructive critiques is to leave constructive critiques. And I'd even add that you need to leave several constructive critiques to receive at least one.<br>

If you can make an active circle of *friends*, that's obviously the best. For this, you need to find photograhers with some common points with you.<br>

Good luck.</p>

You can also organize your photos in the order you want within a presentation.

<div></div>

<div></div>

<div></div>

Do you think the few people who will answer you will be representative of what you're looking for?<br>

BTW, answering "yes" or "no" to such a question without explanation doesn't suit me. Good luck.

<i>That's why I miss the 1's and 2's</i><br>

You're not alone. Wish them back!

<p align="justify">

<i>The problem here, I think, is that we could take an honest 3/3 (I have a lot and still can sleep) as good but how do we know it is honest?</i><br>

By the same way we know - at least we like to imagine - 4s, 5s, 6s and obviously 7s ratings are. Looks like ALL ratings are honest else 3s ones. How simply and logical it is.<p align="justify">

 

I don't like to receive low ratings on a shot I think good but well, what can I do? I prefer to forget these futile numbers and to be more active on photo.net by leaving ratings I think honest (logical, isn't it?) and writing comments/critiques.<p align="justify">

 

To answer Nick's post, I'm not sure that members are more able to leave deserved ratings than free users. The difference between both these photo.net users is only 25$, not at all photographic abilities.</p>

<div></div>

<div></div>

<div></div>

PN was slow some days ago (another thread has been posted about) but looks fast and right now.

<div></div>

<div></div>

<div></div>

<div></div>

<div></div>

<div></div>

<div></div>

(from France) using PN is a bit strange these days: either quite fast or not at all with bugs (and I'm using a good 8Gb DSL). BTW, looks like admins aren't often online at this moment, sure the problem will be fixed as soon they'll be back.

blue-white-red, French flag<div></div>

<div></div>