darcy_cote
-
Posts
280 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by darcy_cote
-
-
"but you don't really need HDR for only two or three exposures."
Why not?
-
What's the real question?
Losing details in the shadows. Is it actually useful to use HDR on a regular basis?
-
Does anyone on a regular basis expose for highlights and shadows with two seperate images,
scan them and use HDR in photoshop or Photomatix? Of course I am talking transparency
large format film.
Darcy
-
Hi there:
I am building a 5x7 camera. I have a older Cambo ground glass back but I need the part/back
the film back attaches to. Does anyone have one that is willing to part with it? It looks like the
photo I have attached. I borrowed the photo off photo.net, I hope the owner does not mind!
regards,
Darcy
-
-
It`s rather odd, but shooting 6x17 on my own camera results in a rather puzzling
outcome..... sometimes a filter is not needed and sometimes it is. Does anyone have an
idea why?
It depends what you photograph. If there is alot of sky then you will see the vignetting and
darker subjects you won't see the vignetting.
When you went with the 90 5.6 sa, you went with a larger image circle thus less vignetting
but you will still get it.
Also, the amount of vignetting you get is dependant on the f stop you use also. smaller f
stops less vignetting.
I am aware of using photoshop cs2 to get rid of the vignetting but I think you are better
off to use the center filter right from the beginning no matter how expensive they are. You
will lose detail on the edges of your image by using the digital filter IMHO
Go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/6x17/ and sign up.
-
That may be a good idea Troy with the plate machined. You have me thinking. Hello by the
way.
Darcy
-
I have bought a calumet 5x7 back and I am going to build a 5x7 camera out of it. To
attach the 6x17 back...I haven't decided how I will do that yet until I get the calumet back
in the mail.
-
Hi there:
I am building a 6x17 film back that will be attached to a 5x7 film holder similar to the
Canham 6x17 back. What I am wanting to know, has there ever been 5x7 film holders that
were made out of aluminum. The plastic ones seem too flimsy for my use and the wooden
ones will probably work, but if there were metal ones, I think that would be my best bet.
Darcy
-
It would be great to see the comparisons Joe photo.
Thanks
Darcy
-
Hi there:
Would this lens be a disappointment when it comes to sharpness and contrast? I am talking
about a 1950's version with a copal shutter. Looking to enlarge up to 24 inches.
-
Good grief, what?s this got to do with a post? Aren?t we all impressed? I think Patrick is just
chatting, I don't think he is trying to impress. :-)
-
I am having trouble keeping track of which roll of film goes with my notes after development.
I recently had 20 rolls of film developed of the rockies. All the notes I had kept for my trip
had no significance when I had a number of pictures of mountains and I couldn't match them
with the notes I had. What system do others use to keep track? Can you label the rolls and
have the lab keep track of them some how?
Darcy
-
Hi there:
I am a Canadian buying a lens in the UK(England)and having it shipped
to Washington. The value of the lens is $730. Is there any duty or
taxes charged in the US? The lens is a used Schneider lens.
Darcy
-
http://www.mew3.com/palm/mooninfo/
http://www.mew3.com/palm/sol2/
For Palm pilots both work well.
Darcy
-
-
Gees to bad to hear about your experience.
My wife is perfect in every way. She gives me nooky whenever I want it, kisses me at the door
the moment in get in, is around for me for every beck and call, and better yet she carries my
60 lb camera backpack when I go hiking.
sorry to hear about your experience. ;-)
-
Hi there;
What center filters are used for the Grandagon 75mm and nikkor 75mm lenses?
regards,
Darcy
-
Are these cameras being built any more? If not, anybody know the selling price of them when
they were manufactured?
Darcy
-
The lens elements and shutter has been placed in silica gel dessicant. Hopefully this will suck
the remaining moisture out.
regards,
Darcy.
Moral of the story: Make sure your quick connect is properly connected each time!
-
Hi there:
I was in the Columbia river gorge photographing waterfalls. First morning, I was tired and
didn't fasten my camera on to the tripod properly with the quick connect. I went to my
camera bag, the camera fell off the tripod. It was all surreal, it starting gaining momentum
down the bank, I took off after it. The camera along with my beautiful Schneider 90mm
lens tumbled into the creek. It took me 0.2 seconds to reach the camera, it was in the
water for about 2 seconds. I quickly ripped out the film ( a 6x17 camera I built) and wiped
off some water off the rear cell. The shutter was full of water. Surprisingly enough, it didn't
look like water entered the cells and the lens didn't have a scratch on it. I dried out the
shutter on my defrost in my van (shutter works perfectly now) and started to use the
camera again that day in the afternoon. The camera itself had a minor scratch on the top
despite tumbling over rocks. I built the camera like a tank. But when I used the camera the
next day, there was alot of moisture around and I think there was still moisture in the
camera body itself, when I changed film, I noticed that there was fog inside the rear cell of
the lens. So moisture was inside. So I took it back to my defrost and the majority of
moisture disappeared. There is still minor amounts in there which shouldn't affect the
pictures.
My questions are:
1. Has this happened to another reader and what have they done about it?
2. Do I need to service the lens?
3. Is there a technique to dry out moisture that is inside a lens?
This definitely shows an advantage for a fully mechanical camera. I do feel like a heel.
Darcy
-
Where can you buy 5x7 transparency film these days?
Darcy
-
I am looking on the used market for a 150mm lens. I have been looking at the schneider
symmar and the Rodenstock sironar n and s.
First of all, will I see a difference in my images if my lens is an apo? Also, what is the
difference between a sironar n and sironar s?
Thanks,
Darcy
-
I requested a forum before from the administrator before and there was no response.
Need help identifying unknown 4X5 film
in Large Format
Posted