Jump to content

darcy_cote

Members
  • Posts

    280
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by darcy_cote

  1. I think your best bang for the buck and keeping the weight down is a Manfrotto 055

    (Bogen 3021) legs and a 460mg magnesium camera head from Manfrotto (Bogen 3437). A

    very lightweight but strong system. I chuck it around not worried since it isn't a $1000

    carbon fiber head combo. Has three leg extensions and don't hesitate using it for large

    format.

  2. Why are you looking for a dedicated macro lens? Unless absolute sharpness is needed

    from film edge to edge you don't need one. For example, shooting flowers or bugs you,

    don't need a dedicated macro lens for 4x5. For shooting some product shots where

    absolute sharpness is critical, then a macro lens may be needed. What are you looking to

    use it for?

     

    Darcy

  3. If you don't need the coverage or the extra view like Michael said, you will be very happy

    with the 75mm lens. I have the 75mm lens and I use it for 6x17 work and it is excellent. I

    use it with the center filter but I am shooting 6x17 (5x7). If you are shooting 4x5, you may

    get away without using the center filter but you will get some minor vignetting. You can

    also compensate for the vignetting after in photoshop cs2 it has a filter to fix vignetting. I

    figured if I am going to put out the money for a 75mm lens, I may as well go all the way

    and get the center filter also. I bought both used. Another thing to think about, are you

    using it for architecture,buildings then teh 72mm is the better lens, are you using it

    primarily for landscapes, the 75mm lens is better because of its size. I hear the 72mm is

    quite a big lens.

     

    Darcy

  4. I have an aluminum manfrotto #055 legs and 3437 head very light setup. I chuck that

    thing around abuse it use it on small to large format with success. Didn't cost much I

    wouldn't be chucking around an expensive cf with expensive head. This one I abuse and It

    serves me well.

  5. CS2 has filter?distort?lens correction. This filter corrects for vignetting. I think you are still

    better off using a center filter though since the information in the shadows along the

    edges may not be there once you correct. Whereas with a center filter the information will

    be there if you expose properly.

     

    CS2 has filter?distort?lens correction. I guess arrow characters don't work well in html. It

    should say:

    Adobe photoshop CS2 has filter----distort---lens correction.

  6. CS2 has filter?distort?lens correction. This filter corrects for vignetting. I think you are

    still better off using a center filter though since the information in the shadows along the

    edges may not be there once you correct. Whereas with a center filter the information will

    be there if you expose properly.

     

    Darcy

×
×
  • Create New...