Jump to content

almagnus

Members
  • Posts

    397
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by almagnus

  1. Fantastic Jim. Sorry I'm always a bit late on the comments. I just think the shadow should be more acute on the edgen and darker near its base (remove also the thin bright line on the bottom of the "apple"). Now I'm trying the think about a link between the sun king and the pepper...

    Now since you made (as usual) such an interesting remark on surrealism (concerning one of my pics : moonset), I think one simple statement from Andre Breton should be considered : "surrealism is based on the belief of a superior reality of certain forms of associations, the overall power of dreams, the disinterested "game" of thought". This is bad literal translation, sorry. In respect of this, I think that most of your compositions, and "moonset", obey to this sentence. Of course all in a different way. Sorry such bad reply! Keep up all the great stuff, and really great to see you back. Amicalement, AM.

     

    statues

          4
    Thanks Jim, you really LOOK at the picture (like listening and hearing...). I like this one because the statue on the right if the only shadowed one, and the tree replaces it, or marks the frontier. He was excluded!

    Untitled

          19
    C'est du faux. L'oiseau est empaille (ca se voit, il bouge pas!), la cigale est en plastique. Pour une pose de studio, c'est pas mal!!! Parcontre tu dois avoir une sacree collection de guepiers empailles ࠬa maison. Non, sans blague, superbe!

    Fallen sky

          10

    "Mind boggling", thats the title! Nice work "master"! All the best to REVAF! PS: not sure if I would have mirrored the pillars, but it sure does add some confusion (where does the light come from?) to the scene. Great concept. I suppose it did justice to your tendinitis!

    Yours, AM

    erg ubari

          33
    A school piece... two horizontal lines at 1/3, two black spots at 1/3, two lines of light at the top of the picture also at 1/3. Great composition.

    Wreck of Esperance

          33
    Really nice work. It's just a pity it doesn't look too sharp. It doesn't bother me but I'm sure some wonder where is the photograph... It could be a picture of a painting! I like the fact that you took the liberty to play around on the frontier, and posted on PN! Yours, AM.
  2. Thanks for one of the nicest comments I've ever had. I thought you deserved that. Since you marvel at photo.net, catch the occasion to decide what "you" want to make out of photography, and work to it. Be very selective. One great one can be diluted by the less good. All the best and sorry for the "patronising" attitude. Yours, AM.

    Spring

          15
    Superbe JP. J'aurai bien vu l'avant plan flou par l'effet du vent. Mais tr賠simple et beau comme l'essentiel de ton travail. COntinues... A+
  3. Thanks Virgil. (I will answer in english). In fact "Les t⣨es solaires" means "solar spots",but also "solar chores"... so I need some help for an english title...As for ladders and ropes, peolpe going up etc.. the explanation is simple. I always find that digital alterations look false and flat if the actors (sometimes digitally set on the picture) don't interact with the elements of the back and foreground. "Interacting" means needing a link of some kind like ladders. The spectators are also a recurrent element. They give the visual link for the spectator you are at the moment. The main idea behind all this is to give a depth in the picture. A certain depth so that the day I pass by (as late as posible!) someone can still see an obvious act of creation and get into the picture just as I did... and I hope you do. Obviously, the A3+ print gives more emphasis and depth to the actual work.

    Yours, AM and thanks for your always generous comment.

×
×
  • Create New...