unohuu

February 12, 2005

too much post processing. lighting too much.

February 9, 2005

Mandar....I appreciate you answering the question.

February 4, 2005

Wide angle would have brought you in closer to them. We would be better able to see those wonderful costumes. Still a good image.

February 4, 2005

I want your input as to whether or not I should include the brush in

the image!

February 2, 2005

composition = 7

use of space and negative space = 7

tone = 7

this is simply beautiful!

February 2, 2005

I need help. i am thinking of a tryptich with some simple graphics as

I prepare for an art fair this summer. Would this interest you as a

simple graphic? Could it hold your interest for a simple shot between

two others?

January 30, 2005

It has its own kinesthetic motion going on. The lighting is so soft and the pattern repetitive and distinct simultaneously. A7/O7

January 25, 2005

brothers. a special bond. good lighting.

January 24, 2005

Lighting is too intense. It washes out the delicate highlights in the flowers and makes the shadows too overpowering in this shot. I like the idea though.

January 19, 2005

Biliana, there was a bit of an aid to balance him and help him stand up straight.

January 19, 2005

i like the diffuse lighting. it softens up everything.

January 19, 2005

good! right down to his bristly beard!

January 19, 2005

a bit of redeye, the doorframe out of the side of her head. good lighting (except redeye). whites not washed out. skin tone seems OK!

January 19, 2005

wonderfully powerful portrait. she exudes wisdom and character and you captured it so well.

January 17, 2005

Thanks for noticing. That must be the vignetting from the polarizer on the 28mm FL. I am cropping and re-sending.

January 16, 2005

great piercing eyes. they are the key to this being's soul for certain!

January 16, 2005

the head lower right is distracting, but I can see you had to work to get this detail. what is the story behind this bright and delightful image? What nation? Tribe? Occasion?