Jump to content

gareth_harper

Members
  • Posts

    1,865
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by gareth_harper

  1. "Are you honestly saying you are not familiar with the concept of watermarking photos?"

     

    Yes, it's ugly and pointless. So why do it.

     

    "You have a terms of use on your website."

     

    Indeed I do, and thank-you for taking the itme to look at my work, I do hope you noticed that my 'terms of use' is not the usual 'all rights reserved', nor are there any ugly 'watermarks'.

     

    "Looking at your portfolio I can see you are attempting to be hard edged; if you want to see something rather closer to the bone look at Vietnam Inc."

     

    I'm not attempting anything, I just record some of the things happen around me.

     

    If you like things close to the bone, have you looked at http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue9711/req1.htm It might help quench your thirst for such things.

     

    "Good luck with developing your style and I hope you continue to capture some more of the world's problems."

     

    You are so kind! As for the world's problems, they are our problems.

     

    Oh, and Miles, I am familar with the work of, as indeed many are one Philip Jones Griffiths.

    Cookstown 100

          10

    Thank-you again for these comments.

    Michael, I think the problem is, that if I get the faces and their expressions in the picture, well then there will be no bike, or if there is a bike it will appear to be in the wrong place. I felt the most important thing was the position of the bike.

    Oh and thank-you for your kind comment and generous rating Kineret.

    Hopefully later in the summer I'll get another chance to shoot some of the Irish Road Racing.

     

    "Muddy and muddled. Is there a point of focus? It appears to be soft throughout. BND "

     

    Paul (class of 62), It's shot with a 35mm prime at 1/60th of a second at about f8, I pre-focused on a bit of the road just in front of me. The print, I can assure you is pin sharp. You are looking at a highly compressed Jpeg at 72dpi, and as such it looks fine to me. Oh the bike is intentionally blurred.

     

     

  2. I dunno, would have been better if you were in front of them and not behind. There are no faces or eyes here. As for gay marriage, well I see no reason why a gay couple cannot have the same rights as a heterosexual couple, whether you call it a partnership or a marriage. It's discrimination.

    Good luck with your photojournalism, and remember get close, very close and shoot wide when you can.

     

    Cookstown 100

          10

    Thank-you for the comments.

    This was supposed to be me making a stab a documenting the Irish road racing scene. Stupidly I only took one camera with me. It jammed on the second roll. Hopefully I'll get back over there for some more road racing later in the summer.

    I know what you mean Nestor, I thought about that, it's not easy. You need a number of bikes bunched up so that somebody turns to watch the first bike go by as another comes through. Also the bikes are set off in groups of four for safety reasons, but now and again you can get them bunching up. There is lots of scope for interesting shots, and if I'd taken a second body....Shutter speed was 1/60th at f8, I'll try 1/30th next time.

  3. Nice shot. I'd have maybe tried to move forward and left a bit to try and catch more of both subjects. Maybe that wasn't possible though and as I know in these situations you take what you can get. As it is is it's pretty good, well done.
  4. Yeah that looks better. Though I'm not sure about changing what you have offered for critique after it's been critiqued. Better to add photo on below or to create a new post.

    Great shot though!

×
×
  • Create New...