Jump to content

Fogging developer


Recommended Posts

I want to replace re-exposure to light chemically. However, the literature I have consulted are vague about the process. Some (Foma)

seem to imply that chemicals simply replace light and that second developer is still needed; others seem to imply that Kodak fd-70

replace the need for redevelopment. I would appreciate any help from anyone using chemical re-exposure, including the chemical

formulas used. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I assume you are talking of B&W reversal? I use Iron Out! This is a rust remover that contains sodium hydrosulfite aka sodium dithionite. 1 to 2 tsp for every roll and it is one shot. The stuff dies on completion, but it does smell pretty! You can get this at Lowes hardware store. The "Iron Out" step replaces flashing (re exposing), developing and fixing. It really simplifies everything. you MUST mix this stuff with distilled water as it will react to impurities in tap water.</p>

<p>I posted a thread on APUG talking about my reversal processing using iron out. You can use any B&W film, but the best results by far are with traditional grain film, not Tmax or the likes. </p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>It ain't theft if it was left there to take..... :)</p>

<p>I made a point to make some sort of record of what I was doing. When I started looking 7 years ago (because some idiot showed me an 8x10 from DR5), there was nothing but really stale info and a ton of misconceptions. It took a while to figure what actually worked and what was bs....or at least misunderstood. I'm glad anyone has made use of it.</p>

<p>Back to the OP, stannous (tin) chloride when added to a regular developer (your pick) will fog the film. There is a magic amount to add depending on the developer. You will have to test this with what ever you use and you will need to find a 'time' to get full black. I used .04 of a gram for 175ml of Dektol 1:3. I drum process, so 175ml was all I needed. I takes a bit more time to get some density, but never as good as "Iron Out".</p>

<p>I sourced mine off ebay from England, as those pesky Americans don't let me have too much fun up here...lol I picked up 250g for pretty cheap. Lifetime supply I guess.</p>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>On the note of using IronOut vs flashing: It may appear that your reversals are too dark when using IronOut. The fact is, this fogger is so complete you probably just need to develop more. Flashing is a bit of an art form and it's hard to compete with the consistency of a chemical fogger.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I want to thank all who responded to my call. I have been developing tri-x reversal movie film (7266) for some time in D-19. The process I have been using requires re-exposure plus a fogging agent. I am familiar with the Orwo sheets, the Foma sheets and writings in various reference books but, as I noted in my first note, there was always a certain vagueness about when a second developer is needed and when not needed. I didn't want to experiment with 100' of film. Years ago I did reversal 35mm b/w slides. I want to begin again using 120 format but wanted to avoid the second light exposure.<br>

Thanks again, everybody</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...