steve_gallimore1
Members-
Posts
1,018 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by steve_gallimore1
-
Nikon F lens to Nikon Z DX 'Speedbooster' Adapter Idea
steve_gallimore1 replied to mike_halliwell's topic in Nikon
Viltrox offer electronic focal reducers, with protocol translation, EOS to Fuji, m4/3, EF-M, Sony and Nikon Z: Viltrox EF-Z2 Speed Booster Allows Canon EF lenses Used on Nikon Z-mount Mirrorless Cameras Support Eye AF Lens Stabilization So that's closer to what you're thinking of. I think Kipon have some similar options? I don't have the Viltrox adaptor, but I do have a Viltrox 33mm f1.4 autofocus lens in Fuji mount and I'm very pleased with it. They strike me as a company that is trying hard, provide lots of firmware updates and are honest about what does/doesn't work. (and the 33/1.4 is a beautiful lens, it leans more toward character than clinical sharpness, but strikes a good balance, think 'classic fast fifty' and you're along the right lines) -
New addition to my darkroom...
steve_gallimore1 replied to hjoseph7's topic in Black & White Practice
I have my enlarger on a board on top of the bath, trays on another board covering the sink. My bathroom is tiny, with about 70x70cm floor space between the bath and the sink. Definitely not enough room to swing a cat. -
Nikon F lens to Nikon Z DX 'Speedbooster' Adapter Idea
steve_gallimore1 replied to mike_halliwell's topic in Nikon
Have a look to see if one of the Chinese manufacturers does one for about 1/4 the price? I have a Zohngyii Lens Turbo 2, in EOS to Fuji X mount, bought used for around half the new price. Not that I have any EOS manual lenses (or any EOS at all), but EOS is a good intermediary mount for stuff like m42, or Nikon F. It works as advertised, but performance varies with the lens used. In short, I would say that it works well with short tele lenses, but badly with anything that puts the rear element close to the converter glass. So my 85mm f2 keeps the same field of view and depth of field as it had on 35mm film when used on an APS sensor, but gathers light like a lens one stop faster. It's not big, but it is heavy, as it is mostly glass inside... -
New addition to my darkroom...
steve_gallimore1 replied to hjoseph7's topic in Black & White Practice
I tried something similar in my tiny darkroom, though I was using the drawers themselves as the trays, on a much smaller unit. It worked, after a fashion, but I had a lot of trouble moving the print from one tray to the next. Obviously, you need to have the developer at the top. I now have 3 8x10 trays side by side, with the developer tray raised above the others as the room is too narrow. One day I'll get a Nova or similar vertical processor, or build a bigger house! -
Need recommendation for SLR replacement
steve_gallimore1 replied to alan_varga's topic in Beginner Questions
If APSc sized sensors are acceptable, you should also be able to find quite a few mirrorless outfits in that price range, Sony or Fuji, maybe Canon EF-M. There are a good selection of fast 35mm (50 equivalent) lenses for the mirrorless mounts and you could use your existing Minolta lenses with an adaptor (and a 1.5x apparent focal length increase). -
New Lens, Old Camera Question
steve_gallimore1 replied to Ricochetrider's topic in Mirrorless Digital Cameras
Leaving aside all the jpeg vs RAW debate, did @Ricochetrider ever get to the bottom of his settings issue? -
Or you could just get a Godox or Yongnou. Don't know how well the TTL stuff works I'm afraid, I only use mine on manual.
-
Mirrorless Monday, Feb 22, 2021
steve_gallimore1 replied to Sanford's topic in Mirrorless Digital Cameras
Still with my friends the cows: Oly E-PM1, 17/2.8, cropped and monochrome from RAW. I think I've seen more cows than people these last 12 months. -
Exploitation of Photographers...
steve_gallimore1 replied to hjoseph7's topic in Business of Photography
Perhaps the most important tool in your bag is an effective bullshit detector? -
Agree. Though I do like to shoot my lenses at or near wide open, perhaps more often than is strictly necessary, but I choose my lenses based on their 'character' (aberrations) and that is typically most pronounced wide open. Super fast shutter speeds on modern cameras have made shooting fast lenses wide open in daylight without ND filters possible, so that may be one reason we see more of it now.
-
Help! Stuck Filter...
steve_gallimore1 replied to Vincent Peri's topic in Casual Photo Conversations
LOL It's been a long day, but that made it better. I think, given the plastic, fragile feeling nature of my lens, my filter is staying put! -
New Lens, Old Camera Question
steve_gallimore1 replied to Ricochetrider's topic in Mirrorless Digital Cameras
I've just been through all the settings on my E-PM1 and I couldn't actually find anything that disabled RAW. Art filters still give me a RAW + jpeg, as does iAuto, scene, etc. I don't have HDR though. Aspect ratios are fine too. I didn't go as far as to put the card in a computer to see if the RAW was still 4:3, regardless of the ratio selected, but some cameras do... Definitely try a reset. One thought, does the E-M1 have two card slots? -
Help! Stuck Filter...
steve_gallimore1 replied to Vincent Peri's topic in Casual Photo Conversations
I bought an Olympus 17mm f2.8, with a 'protection' filter. It won't come off. Tried a pair of filter wrenches, one on the filter, the other on the lens barrel (it will just fit an closest focus), nothing. Given up now as I'm too afraid of breaking the AF mechanism on this mostly plastic lens. I think it's been on there since new. Maybe it's glued on? -
Upgrading From iPhone
steve_gallimore1 replied to TimeExposure's topic in Casual Photo Conversations
If you're looking at the Fuji X100 series cameras, you might also want to take a look at the X-E series. An X-E4 with the 27mm f2.8 pancake is about the same size and considerably cheaper than an X100V. It is an interchangeable lens system, but as above, you don't have to use it as such. -
New Lens, Old Camera Question
steve_gallimore1 replied to Ricochetrider's topic in Mirrorless Digital Cameras
No, you get a corrected JPEG and an uncorrected RAW, at least with Olympus, Panasonic and Fujifilm. I don't think that it's actually possible to disable the lens corrections for the JPEG on Olympus/micro four thirds? -
You design the camera...
steve_gallimore1 replied to fotolopithecus's topic in Casual Photo Conversations
Epson R-D1? A used Leica M8 is probably cheaper though... I want the same, but it needs to have a full frame (35mm) sensor, so as to match focal lengths with film. I have other priorities though, like a house, so a matched pair of Leicas (film and digital) will have to wait. -
New Lens, Old Camera Question
steve_gallimore1 replied to Ricochetrider's topic in Mirrorless Digital Cameras
This Give the mode dial a twist, even if it's already on 'M', it might have somehow bumped to another setting. There might be some other settings that could exclude RAW capture, but I'm afraid I'm still learning my Olympus.. usual suspects would be anything like HDR or maybe very high or low (extended) ISO settings. -
Focus Peaking with MF Lenses.... DSLR & Mirrorless.
steve_gallimore1 replied to mike_halliwell's topic in Nikon
Not sure about Nikon, but on Fuji mirrorless, you can choose between focus peaking (contrast detection) and a split image 'rangefinder' (phase detection). The split image gives a monochrome view of horizontal 'stripes', alternating left and right, from, I presume, the phase detection pixels on the sensor. I find peaking works well overall, split image works best with long(er), fast(er) lenses. -
-
Mirrorless Monday, Feb 15, 2021
steve_gallimore1 replied to Sanford's topic in Mirrorless Digital Cameras
-
YOUR FIRST CAMERA
steve_gallimore1 replied to Jeffrey L.T. von Glück's topic in Classic Manual Film Cameras
An anonymous plastic 35mm 'focus free' thing, long since gone, though I used it for many years as a child. First camera I bought myself was a Zenit B. -
Mirrorless Monday, Feb 8, 2021
steve_gallimore1 replied to Sanford's topic in Mirrorless Digital Cameras
I was surprised when I saw that you'd listed the XF 27mm, but I figured maybe you didn't mind wet feet! -
Mirrorless Monday, Feb 8, 2021
steve_gallimore1 replied to Sanford's topic in Mirrorless Digital Cameras
-
Is your safelight, well, safe? Take a sheet of paper, place it on your enlarger, put a few coins on it and leave it there for 15 minutes, then process. If you can see outlines of the coins... I mention this as some variable contrast papers are not at all safe with the common yellow-brown safelights sold for use with variable contrast paper. Foma, in particular, needs a low powered red safelight.