Jump to content

brother_soulnier

Members
  • Posts

    223
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by brother_soulnier

    Ruthy

          11

    like your camera angle, pose and lighting. my one pick is how well her shorts blend with the background, that curve does not pop like I would like to see. cheers...

    Small Boy on Bike

          6

    you understand my point, I see so many sites that have zero feedback on others work, or some people that post a comment that says, if you have the time please look at my new stuff.

    This digital world has turn the art of photographic images, into some kind of megapixel waste land, when people have nothing to say at all that is frightening.

    Somehow we need to move away from the digital dumping ground of millions of images, and go back to print for our product, I think showing this as a framed print would have more impact.

    1-DSC_0047.JPG

          11

    I am no more angry than your comment as to this being a suggestive photo. I would not want to give anyone the notion that I am exploiting children as the likes of Sally Mann did.

    I do understand any feedback is better than no feedback, but I just want to make others aware of intention of photo, it was not of your thinking of suggestive.

    1-DSC_0047.JPG

          11

    yes she is young, and her mom was standing right next to me as I was photographing her, please note that she is wearing shorts.
    So, yes she is young for your intentions of what you might be thinking, but not everyone is thinking that. Thank you for your comment.

  1. John, I am not following you on this post, although I'm here commenting, it has more to do with lack of subject impact than anything else, the image is flat and something I would not expect from a photojournalist.
    this image was really the most you had for inspiration in your day to share with us?

    Untitled

          4

    thank you for the clarification, I did not know you were looking for technical feedback and not what professional photographers might see with their eyes. I am just a photographer since 1975.

    All I have in my defense is when I do a wedding and get prints back, I can lay the prints on the wedding gown and they match, I think it best that I skipped all the techno gamma color stuff, I would have thought something was off when it really was not.

    Humor me and take a paint chip off that wall and put it next to your monitor.

    Untitled

          4

    I am going to say that I have a well calibrated eye, overlooking your thoughts about my monitor, here let me give you a little old school basics, I look at my camera screen and then compare my monitor, all monitor calibration mean squat if it does not match my cameras output, with that said, this image has a red overcast, like you may have used a magenta filter in your post process.

    I don't like when people tell me not to do something on a public forum, who are you?

    Little Girl

          5

    If you had a white poster board and bounced some light back on her face you would of had the results you were looking for with your camera settings, you need to remember a camera reads reflective light, and her white pants might have push your shutter speed up, the camera if not set to spot metering is reading the light bouncing off her pants, and not her face.
    If you had a hand held incident light meter and metered next to her face, your numbers would have been different then your camera settings. you may have blown out her pants slightly, but you would of had better skin tone on her face, which is your main subject.

    That looked like a tricky place with all that broken lighting, on an overcast day this same place would yield a much nicer image with a slight fill light.

    Hope this helps a little.

×
×
  • Create New...