<p>Here's <em>The Washington Post's</em> take on the story: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/12/11/this-peter-lik-photograph-reportedly-just-went-for-a-world-record-6-5-million/?tid=hp_mm</p>
<p>I was surprised by a couple of critics' remarks quoted there:</p>
<ul>
<li><em>Guardian </em>art critic Jonathan Jones said, "The fact that it is in black and white should give us pause. Today, this deliberate use of an outmoded style can only be nostalgic and affected, an ‘arty’ special effect. We’ve all got that option in our photography software."</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Megan Dick, the director of Australia’s MiCK gallery, said, “Being such a literal interpretation of the subject, landscape photography is more in the realm of documentary rather than art.” (I wonder whether she thinks it was art when Ansel <em>et al.</em> did it but isn't anymore, or whether it never was.)</li>
</ul>