Jump to content

michael_przewrocki2

Members
  • Posts

    148
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by michael_przewrocki2

  1. <p>I still dont understand why optixpcb offers both versions. The one with hole i dont understand.<br> my m42-lenses all have M/A-ring. i also have p6/M42.<br> so lets compare both: <br> M/A: M/A-difference only working when pin is pushed. In Auto-aperture set-one can quickly switch to fully open.<br> The only "advantage" of that hole is leaving the spring untouched. permanent pressure could weaken it.<br> Just have found out that one of my two Vivitars M42 had oily blades and i can see how slow mechanisme is.<br> Super Takumar 50/1.4 was hardly ever on an adapter and wonderfully working.<br> So the hole in adapter has two advantages:<br> a) left in automode no pressure on spring<br> b) switching from M to A opens aperture quickly<br> So i will get one with hole.<br> Where is the advantage of having NO hole pin always pressed? accidental switch to A and fully open lens? </p>
  2. <p>Optixpcb has m42-eos-adapter in two versions. one of them seems the have a hole to fit the pin.<br />one of them is: Black without width edged<br> But i only understand it for m42-cams where cams lever will hit that pin an close aperture.<br> it seems there are three different m42-versions. read somewhere but i cant remember details<br> Thanks</p>
  3. <p>Recently i found a thread here where someone mentioned to have a solution how to adapt view-lenses to Mamiya-Press cams. But its hard to find it again... even over google.<br />I PM him but no reply yet received. Yes i am also in contact with anthony sansone but he is busy.<br />Thanks a lot</p>
  4. <p>Yes i am in contact again. But he is hardly avaible, has no internet etc. often. Gave me hints about MUP, filmbacks, imagequality, focussing.<br />i have just tested-at least on the desk-using 35mm-film in 67/120/220 back in 220-setting. Its not flat.... no good idea probably. better using rb67/70 vaccum back on g-adapter, maybe 35mm possible there in 70mm cartridge. why not running 2x35mm if no other choice there....?</p>
  5. <p>Only 67-72mm stepup-ring is matching 62.55mm thick lens-front.</p>
  6. <p>maybe for smaller filmsize also larger apertures will perfectly work. first tests are promising but lens is not yet finished. we must add a special shorter camera tube to novoflex B to fit shorter than official 400mm lens. and lens-adapter also not yet ready.</p>
  7. <p>i was shooting against the sun on 35mm cam. was terrible. had contax 180/2.8 is like day and night.<br> i had a discussion with someone which had to leave contax/Zeiss for nikon(i still have contax system and eos DSLR 1000D). he told under difficult light zeiss is better. but meanwhile nikon also has better lenses, so has sigma. <br />regarding vignetting. the speedier and longer the 35mm lens the better the chance it will cover 6x7 without light-fall of even fully open. ok at least in viewfinder....THE BOKEH FACTORY on FB is doing such conversions.<br> i compared 80mm/2.8 biometar with zeiss /C/Y)85mm/1.4(i also have 2.8) biometar is soft. precise tests will be done when optixpcb-adapter is in house. some old aspherical lens on APS-C: Wow even fully open!</p>
  8. <p>Anthony Sansone-very busy actually-once promised 4x5-conversion of mamyia press. At least he replied some days ago. but we didnt discuss this theme. But other news. so be prepared for instant-news.<br />i am here to find a better alternative to one-lens polaroidconversions by option8(on FB). Yes he has also removable lens version for 600SE and 45-systems but only 127mm is coupled. other lenses from 90-150, also longer but not infinity working only via scale and groundglass. on 600SE-cam instant-backs are switchable: all three are working. pola100, instaxwide, sx70/impossible. polaroid 600SE-filmbacks possible with adapter(M for MUP)-G for RB67.</p>
  9. <p>I can confirm that old apo-ronar 360/9 must have 54.5mm front thread. will measure said .5 pitch.<br> SN 57009827<br> i compared/ measured inner and outside dimensions where i had them(55mm filter) and from differences i have got 54.33mm for lens-thread.<br> since lens/filter got 54.83mm i added .17mm to both to get 55mm rsp 54.5mm! BINGO</p>
  10. <p>Are there old data-sheets for these lenses? to confirm these 54.5 x .5 i could mount but barely rotate a stepup-adapter 55mm. which has .75 standard filter pitch. 54.39mm measured^.</p>
  11. <p>I wonder if i can get filter-adapters 54.5mm.... and filter holder for the 360/9. maybe 54.5 to 58mm would we wise. on apo-gerogons 210 and 240 i have dual-lensshades 52 and 58mm. i could add 62mm and more....</p>
  12. <p>very good project. dont ever be influenced what people say. Film dead, 4x5 dead.<br />If you need more money think about spreading the informations. or ask people here to inform about places to do.<br />i often wondered, when i saw good ideas which were not backed why i didnt see them earlier elsewhere.</p>
  13. <p>So for infinity work with 210, 240 and 360mm which of these are best APO-Ronar, Apo-Gerogon or Rodagon. I have also G-clarons, also 150mm. only 6x6-cam used maybe also with tilt-adapter. b+w film. For color-film MC apo-ronars would be better right?</p>
  14. <p>newest flashes:<br> http://blog.slach.at/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Metz-camera-compatibility-April-2015.pdf</p>
  15. <p>http://www.bhphotovideo.com/FrameWork/charts/comp_metzflash_canon_2.html#note<br> 3101, 3101M3 and 3101M4 versions depending cameras.<br> e.g.<br> 3101 as of M3 - for E-TTL-function with 40 MZ-3i and 40 MZ-1i<br> 3101 M4 power shot pro 70 the only digital cam listed.<br> Where are the others? all the DSLRs?</p>
  16. <p>E-TTL versus E-TLL II<br> http://www.photo.net/canon-eos-digital-camera-forum/00AW7n<br />interesting study also understand what chipped-adapters can do. maybe better for testing using EF-lens only.<br> with 380 EX and dandelion-adapter for manual lenses reflector will be zoomed. i wonder what will happen if no-chip-adapter is used.</p>
  17. <p><strong>Type A-II cameras:</strong> There is a sub-group of Type A cameras which enables E-TTL II flash metering with EX-series Speedlites.<br />since 380EX is only E-TTL and not E-TTL II it seems not to work on 1000D(Type-A-II) anyway.<br />i could check with 50E since its made for it. n.b: highspeed-exposure times are working with 1000D and TTL also(within limits) but only on hotshoe. higher speed will reduce flashpower. further testings.</p>
  18. <p>more here:<br /> http://photonotes.org/articles/eos-flash/<br /> type-B-bodies listed:<br /> http://photonotes.org/articles/eos-flash/#aandb<br /> <strong>Type B bodies</strong></p> <blockquote> <p><strong>Support for TTL and A-TTL only:</strong><br /> EOS 600 series - 600, 620, 630, 650, RT<br /> EOS 700, 750, 800<br /> EOS 1<br /> EOS 10/10S/10QD<br /> First generation Rebel series - Rebel, Rebel S, EOS 1000 and all 1000 variants, Rebel II, Rebel X, XS/EOS 500/Kiss<br /> EOS Elan/100<br /> EOS A2(E)/5<br /> EOS 1N, 1NRS<br /> EOS 3000/88, 5000/888<br /> EOS DCS3, DCS1 (first generation digital)<br> ---------------------------------------<br> http://cpn.canon-europe.com/content/education/infobank/flash/speedlite_compatibility.do<br> <strong>Type A cameras:</strong> E-TTL autoflash metering is only supported by EOS cameras introduced at the same time or later than the EX-series Speedlites. These models allow the viewfinder sensors to be used for both ambient and flash readings. These cameras, called Type A, include the EOS 1V, 3, 30, 30V. 33, 33V, 300, 300V, 300X, 3000N, 3000V, 50E, 50, 500N, IX, IX7 and all EOS digital cameras. Type A film cameras also include sensors that can read flash illumination off the film during an exposure, so EZ-series Speedlites can be used with A-TTL autoexposure.<br> <strong>Type A-II cameras:</strong> There is a sub-group of Type A cameras which enables E-TTL II flash metering with EX-series Speedlites. These include the EOS 30V, 33V, 300X, 1D Mark II, 1D Mark II N, 1D Mark III, 1Ds Mark III, 5D, 5D Mark II, 20D, 20Da, 30D, 40D, 50D, 350D, 400D, 450D and 1000D.</p> </blockquote>
  19. <p>Here seems the best explenations: at least for speedlites<br />http://cpn.canon-europe.com/content/education/infobank/flash/speedlite_compatibility.do<br />my 1000D is AII-type, <br> <strong>Centre:</strong> Type A cameras have sensors in the viewfinder area that read both ambient and flash illumination. These sensors operate with EX-series Speedlites. The cameras also have flash sensors in the bottom of the camera body for A-TTL metering with EZ-series Speedlites.<br> Why the hell are they not listing B-type cameras?</p>
  20. <p>here is one of the mentioned lists but not the leaflet from 1/94:<br> http://www.bhphotovideo.com/FrameWork/charts/comp_metzflash_canon.html<br> more here: interestingly he does not mention A-TTL only TTL:<br> interesting is mentioning of C.Fn.<br />http://www.p4pictures.com/2014/08/difference-e-ttl-ttl-canon-flash/<br> in my 1000D C.Fn III(no6) autofocus/transport i can set active, deactive and only active with external flash.<br> maybe when using manual lens one must set external flash option when flash on cable.<br> maybe flash-measuring is coupled with AF sort of A-TLL. SCA 3101-module has A-TTL off or on. </p>
  21. <p>I meant using the external cable of canon on metz instead of 307A or 3007A. I could simulate SCA 300-system on Contax 139/137 MA since i have flashmeter. pity not contax RTS III anymore where flashmeter is build-in.</p>
  22. <p>In SCA-30-list 1/94 not everything is clear. its too complicated to explain. one does not know which functions work for certain cam because they made unclear clamp for a cgroupd of cameras with different functions-combination. instead of just setting the blue points to where its working. What the hell were they thinking?<br> because of that i am unsure of EOS1(EOS1N) is working TTL with 311.<br> 312 AF only adds AF-metering-flash. but i will use manual lens. so 311 should do.<br> they say for 312 AF one needs distant piece SCA 300D with work oin 32 MZ-3, 40MZ-2, 32 CT 7 and 32 CT-8. to avoid colliding AF-beam with lens in my opinion.<br />i also have a combined instructions 300/3000(consulted seen some days ago) but i cant find right now. anyone seen online? german or english</p> <p> </p>
  23. <p>Hello I am trying to find out why e-ttl is not working on 1000D when using SCA 3000 cable-system(3000A) with metz 32 MZ-3 and canon speedlite 380EX with chinese copy of cable 2(what the complete canon model-name?).<br /> maybe both cable are defective. or also 3101-adapter. Its also not working on Eos-1N<br /> I wonder of i need an adapter upgrade. my version is: 3101 M. Is there a list showing the versions for EOS?<br /> Must also study adapter-manual. among others it has a-ttl-setting(off and on-option). maybe my SCA-flash with 3101 can only A-TTL.<br /> i also have 3102 but flash is 3000-type not 3002.<br />Next will be getting original canon cable 2 and a new 3000A.<br /> SCA-flash is working properly with SCA 300-system using 311. 311 cannot be used with 1N. <br /> on hotshoe TTL seems to work. will test again.<br /> SCA-Manual says shortest exposure is 15% from largest distance. So i dont wonder why at 1m at 100iso aperture larger than f2.8 are not possible. maybe with more diffusion or ND. plastic-filters no good idea. i once used a nd-gelatine filter which burnt a bit...<br /> Background is adjusting roundflash-reflector(chinese copy) for TTL and closeups.<br /> I am using this german info-site about SCA-system:<br /> http://faq.d-r-f.de/wiki/Metz_SCA-FAQ<br />among another a list with flashes:<br /> metz mecablitz system sca 300/3000: welcher adapter passt zu ihrer kamera?<br /> which adapter is working with your camera<br> should be in first link<br> http://faq.d-r-f.de/w/images/4/46/SCA_300-D.pdf</p>
×
×
  • Create New...