William Michael

As another "by the way" - Mickey - in my leisure time last evening, I interrogated the deleted images queue and there seems none deleted by you: I might have missed your User name, if I did sorry, it was late, past midnight. Therefore - on the assumption that you have no Images recently deleted I reckon this matter is closed. On the other hand - if you did delete images recently - then let the cycle runs its course and don't re delete the same image. Thanks. WW

My educated guess is 're-deleting' the same image has begun a new cycle for the permanent deletion - then you've raised a complaint and a Moderator has addressed that complaint. However . . . The essence of your position is in the underlined bolded bit of the section I have quoted from your response. viz: "I don’t really care if my deleted image(s) remain visible to me while awaiting the delete proc to run." And as there are many other urgent matters requiring attention, then for foreseeable future you should be content with deleting an image ONCE and then waiting for the cycle to permanently delete that image. Thank you for your understanding. One other point, by the way, - Only those with Moderator Traits can permanently delete the images - and all Moderators are volunteers. WW

Even on websites where Right Click and then [Save Image] is disallowed, once an image is published on the web, it is able to be downloaded if the desire to do so is present: note, even if the image has been 'deleted' it can be found. Understood that locks on doors inhibit naughty (opportunistic) events happening and it would be nice in a perfect platform to have lots of user options, however my view is, publishing low res images suffices do do away with big-time theft of one's work. As we don't have a perfect platform (but have made recent big advancements) I reckon time spent looking at the big picture item fixes is better spent than making a user option to have download image "on" or "off" - I do think most people understand (or should understand) that once they publish ANYTHING on the www, it can be found and subsequently downloaded. WW

It's understood that not all the Site Help threads are read, on the other hand, it does bode well to have a squizz at previous conversations especially when this particular topic is quite a common discussion piece - and as an helping hand, if in the future a member sees a similar gripe, can you please refer them to the question already addressed - hopefully this detailed information will assist . . . The process of deleting on this system is automatically TIME segmented. One should not assume an immediate response. Similar to a PC - one dumps the rubbish in "Trash", where it resides, until the Trash is EMPTIED. This functionality has been explained before. Please read this conversation for a detailed answer, with examples LINK It is easy to mark a photo and delete it - and yes - a background process does (permanently) delete later. This has been explained before. As a test, my colleague, who is a "Member" of Photo.net, in the last hour logged in and deleted two of their images. The procedure is (and was always on this platform) as follows - Using the drop down on your name, select [Profile] Then [Images] Then hover the mouse over the Image and select [View the Image] In the new window at the bottom left, there is a drop down [Manage Image] - select [Delete] - There will be a pop up asking to confirm the delete selection. Returning to your Profile, you will now note that the 'deleted' image still appears, however it is encased in a light purple surround, this indicates the 'deletion' (which as described above and previously is an AUTOMATIC and TIME DELAYED managed process. If any member requires deletion of their account and the contents contained therein, then simply ask a Moderator. This also has been mentioned previously and numerously. There have been Members who have requested this, and, ever since these cited (new) EU laws have been in effect, I know of no request which has not been done (immediately) upon a Moderator receiving that request. WW Below are screen shots which will assist in your quest to delete your Images -

BTW - I can't find a Canon model "t7s". I can find (USA models) T7; T7i; and T6s - all these models, with the kit lens, would suit the situation as I described above. WW

I am confused - Does this mean "I presently use a Canon T7s" - or - "the 'school' uses Canon T7s" If the former, then I suggest the chap use his T7s for the course, especially if this is an High School Course. What's the course comprise? A few of years ago I got talking to two High School Teachers at a restaurant in San Francisco - at the school they taught, the (Art) curriculum is similar to what I know here: focusing on (practical) basics incorporating both the 'artistic' and the 'technical' elements of Photography, additionally, with splattering of 'history' thrown in. If this is the situation for this student, then a Canon entry level DSLR and kit lens would be (more than) adequate. *** On the point of expansion of a kit at a later date, when one has a better idea of the objectives of one's Photography (be they amateur or professional) , I agree with point Ed Farmer made regarding Canon and Nikon: I too have been slammed for that opinion: regarding 135 Format, since 1972 I've used Minolta, then Nikon then Canon; as I developed my Photography and as my business interests widened I quickly realized it was only Nikon and Canon that offers the range and a quick and easy of access of product, beyond others. The reason I changed from all Nikon to all Canon (cica. 2004) was, (IMO) Canon nailed Digital early on with the 20D, 30D and 5D. As well as directing the question here, the student should direct his question to the teacher(s) of the course. *** If the meaning of the quoted section is the school uses Canon T7s, then (if supplied by the school), I reckon the student should use that camera for the course: if the school doesn't allow 24 hour access to the camera, then I recommend a second hand purchase or perhaps borrowing a DSLR or Mirrorless - as Rodeo mentioned, mirrorless has advantages, at a price cost though. *** As a general comment, I think "investing" $1000.00 for (what I assume is) a High School Photography course is putting the cart before the horse - if by another means there is a basic DSLR or Mirrorless available at no cost - use that, for the time being: after the course the student will (should) know a lot more about how to spend $1000.00 and how to get a better bang for those 1000 bucks. WW

In what role? What were your responsibilities? What is the market there? Not really relevant at this point of the Business Planning. Answering the questions above will be start to your Business Plan. WW

I don't like them. For events (and weddings) I use(d) an individual strap for each camera. Carrying three cameras, typically two with long straps slung over my shoulders, and one on a wrist strap. With two cameras, typically one slung and one on my wrist strap. If using Flash, then those would be on the slung cameras, usually on a bracket. Wrist strap camera never has Flash. I tried belt clip and bracket and I found the weight distribution on my waist was uncomfortable. If using a Telephoto Lens (300 or longer) then that's usually on a Monopod and when not in use I leave it on the ground near where I am shooting and carry it over shoulder when traveling. I don't tend to 'carry' my kit bag around with me when shooting, I leave it close by in a safe place, unless I have an assistant, which is rare these days. *** The extremely good quality Zoom Lenses, Digital Cameras and large content recording cards available nowadays, allows Wedding and Event Photographers to travel carrying (only) two Camera Bodies and two Zoom Lenses (or in the case of Events, such as Sport, one Camera with a Zoom and one with a Telephoto) A few extra recording cards; a note taking device (i.e. mobile phone); White Card; Colour Check Card; and perhaps a Flash Modifier, in their pocket. If using flash, each Camera could have a Speedlite, perhaps one on a Bracket, if necessary. *** As a general comment: Since 2004, I have extolled the virtues of a Dual Format Digital System with two (fast) Zoom Lenses for uses such as Weddings and Events - that is the basic kit for this type of work. If using Flash then add two good quality Speedlites. Digital Cameras and the advancement in Zoom Lens technology (and Digital Post Production) has done away with the need for carrying 3 or 4 cameras, Multiple Lenses, Film Bags, and a lot of "stuff". These advancements should allow the Photographer to focus more on the Photography, not all the ad-on 'stuff' that sales folk and internet bloggers would have one believe is necessary and professional. WW

My comment addresses only Portraiture, in its widest meaning - "photographing people'. The main focus of my Photography, both Professional and Amateur, is and has been 'people'. Mentioned many times before in these Forums is "rapport". A suggestion addressing 'ideas of things you can "do" with amateur photography' whilst incorporating 'it is nice to do something constructive with what I have' - would be to seek out the opportunities of Portraiture (as I defined above). I continue to shoot amateur Sports fixtures, mainly Youth Swimming and Field Hockey - give the keepers to the Clubs for their Facebook page etc. (as one example) If you have connection with a Church - consider an expose on the History of the Church - That could be Architecture - the Prominent people - what they each do - the ideas are limitless . . . *** I mention 'rapport' because it is a great thrill (for me) to engage with people, when working through the lens: people from all walks of life and with an host of diverse experiences and viewpoints of and on life. A value add, is one the shutter is released, I have that moment, for ever. And sometimes doors open very wide to ongoing constructive experiences - WW

In light of Glen's comments, to be clear I was thinking the OP (exclusively) meant using an Enlarger and Wet, Photographic Paper Development, when he wrote "film negative and developing it on photo paper". WW

WW

Gidday and welcome, Interesting screen name: I didn’t study much Chemistry, but I do remember Bismuth is like a Metal, but not a true Metal. Amazing what we remember. Arhh, "Boof" I think has origins in the Newspaper Cartoon 'Dagwood and Blondie' Good name, a contraction of "Boof-Head". That's something my Dad called me, often. I reckon you might get lots of advice, My first advice is to post an image on which you are seeking advice in Seeking Critique Forum. Include the shooting conditions and EXIF and also explain what you wanted to achieve, but didn't. Hope you enjoy Photo.net. WW

The HDMI OUTPUT of the EOS7D is MINI HDMI PORT (female) therefore to connect to that, you will need one end of the cable to be MINI HDMI JACK (male) Need to confirm exactly what the connection is on your monitor - perhaps a photo will assist? The next question is, if the input to your Monitor is not HDMI, then before buying cable, you should confirm that the HDMI output of the 7D is compatible with the INPUT of your Monitor. WW

Hello and welcome Big "party", nice shot. Here is one of my photos of a party with inside atmosphere - WW

Understand. Thank you for your efforts thus far. I encourage you can put your mind to enjoying other aspects of PN during this demanding period. If I recall correctly, you have been around for along time and, not necessarily because of that longevity only, are a valued Member. WW

Thank you for your efforts. Totally understand your feel discouragement. My suggestion: don't report the spam, enjoy other parts of PN instead. The spam will be removed - just choose to ignore it until it is removed. *** I am quite certain that idea is at the top of the leader board for adaptation. As I have mentioned before - all suggestions are read and appreciated: please understand that implementation of 'quality updates' is neither immediate, nor necessarily easy. WW

If that test revels what appears as Printer Ink - then that is a very good indication that the image is printed from a scan. Good luck. Oh well the journey through Google was probably not that bad - something to moan about over a beer, or coffee with a friend. BTW I loved Alaska, so much fun - my body-clock went haywire. WW

If I understand your question, the difference would be the paper and the chemicals contained therein. Enlarger or Wet Printing requires a chemical reaction in the paper; Printing a digital image (typically) is ink on paper or a variant. Hybrid printing, as mentioned (above), could confuse a touch/smell/texture investigation, however a forensic analysis to investigate the chemical components of the item has always been definitive in any situation I have experienced. Forensic Analysis in many situations can be relatively rudimentary. *** Not really. If you are in Alaska, (which is a long distance from me), and if you do not require an opinion to 'hold up in a court of law' then I suggest you ferret out an experienced Dark Room Technician (probably they're retired now) - any one who has worked for several years in a Darkroom would be able to provide a reasonable sturdy viewpoint. Don't know too much about Schools up your way, but down here some High Schools have active Dark Rooms, used to develop and print B&W Negs: this is for a historical significance, and context to the Matriculation Art Course, majoring in Photography: the Teachers are typically into B&W Film and Wet Printing the Negs - you might find a suitable "expert" there - add to that the resources of the Science Lab for chemical testing purposes. WW

Because (my) advice would be different, depending whether you were photographing at night or at daytime. As mentioned previously, in daylight Flash is generally used as "Fill" and my advice was according to that technique. If you are photographing outdoors at night time - then the Flash would typically be the Main (Key) Light source. In this situation you might try bouncing the Flash. No, I assumed nothing other than you required advice. Sarcasm is unwarranted. The advice you were requesting was unclear to me because there was confusing/contradictory information in your commentary thus more information was requested from you to best tailor my responses: to assist you. Good luck in your endeavours. WW

^^^ haha - If I recall - correctly that's a dry Australian humour in action. On the other hand, our West Point new-comer might like the challenge of fixing it, for the sake of fixing it: I have a trillion examples on my list, in my shed! WW

GENERAL COMMUNITY WIDE COMMENT - It has been mentioned several times by others, not I, yet I find it necessary to mention now: this new platform is way less than adequately equipped to manage and arrange in a manner to suit all user's requests. It will NEVER function the same as the previous iterations of Photo.net, that is FACT. There are some very talented and extremely dedicated Members who are managing the back end of the Forums and Images. This is done their OWN TIME and at their OWN EXPENSE. None of these folk require, nor ask for accolade, money nor any particular mention. Respect and understanding of the fact that: what we have is what we have will however go a long way in the journey. Also what goes a long way is respecting and understanding - Members' comments apropos ideas for improvement and drawing attention to shortcomings of the system are read and appreciated ALL Requests CANNOT be acted upon immediately - mostly all forum posts in Site Help are answered: understand that, given the limitation of the system, it is impossible to facilitate all requests. Have a great week end. WW

In that case it shall not be interpreted as "thank you". Mea Culpa. In the big scheme of things here at Photo.net and with respect to the numerous complaints concerning hundreds of images that seemingly* could not be deleted by the user who posted them - after the efforts to manage a system bulk deletion - complaining about having one or two remnants still existing does seem an insignificant whine. *** *seemingly because the process of deleting on this system is automatically TIME segmented. One should not assume an immediate response. Similar to a PC - one dumps the rubbish in "Trash", where it resides, until the Trash is EMPTIED. This functionality has been explained before. *** The image cited above, or a copy of it, appeared in "Sport" for User Comments. The image was "Hidden", which probably explains why you could not access it. Don't ask how it got into Sport, or why, I don't know. The image had several comments attached to it, one was from your login which read in part, "... it was so long ago I had forgotten about this". The image, which appeared in Sport, and the comments attributed to it, have been permanently deleted from the system. No thanks are required. WW

Clarifying - Does this mean: "Regardless of What Shutter Speed is selected on the Shutter Speed Dial [B 1 2 4 8 15 30 60 125 250 500 1000] when the Shutter Release Button is pressed, the Mirror goes UP and Shutter Curtain OPENS, and stays open, until I release my finger on the Shutter Button" If yes, then the camera is acting as if the "B" is ALWAYS selected. Therefore the fault is probably located somewhere in the shutter speed mechanism chain. This begins at the Shutter Speed Dial (outside the camera) and ends at the Shutter Mechanism (inside the camera). It might be a mechanical issue - for example (and hopefully simply) the Shutter Speed Dial is not engaged properly and that's why the selection is stuck on "B". WW

I think you need to explain more - over the weekend you want to take pictures using the flash outdoors, when exactly - at NIGHT or during DAYLIGHT hours? WW