Jump to content

mark_scheuern

Members
  • Posts

    193
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by mark_scheuern

  1. I don't quite get the idea behind VR lenses. Why not just use a faster lens to begin with? Is a VR lens substantially lighter or less expensive than a faster lens?

    A VR (or IS) lens allows you to hand-hold at a slower shutter speed than you'd otherwise be able without unacceptable camera-shake.It's true that a faster lens would let you shoot a a higher shutter speed, but sooner or later you'll still reach a point where the lens is wide-open and then you need to shoot at a lower speed. Also, running around with an 80-400 f/2-f/2.8 would not be something I'd like to attempt. And, sometimes, as in this very POW-worthy example, you want to shoot at a low enough speed to get some motion blur but hand-holding at that speed would be difficult. You also might not want the shallower DOF that a wider aperture would cause.

  2. A great job of capturing the activities of the crew. I like the light. The Bentley is such a beautiful car. Too bad that white thing is in the lower right corner, but other than that it's a very good shot.

    Untitled

          2
    Very nice work, especially considering the difficult color (black). A more interesting sky would have helped (and I'm wondering about that dark spot in the upper left-hand corner), but I like it very much.

    BMW

          6
    It's Ralf! The trick is to pre-focus on the spot where you know the car's going to be, pan with the car, smoothly squeeze off the shot at the proper moment, and follow-through. And it takes lots of practice. Nicely composed except for the background (the Orange ads are rather distracting), and more background blur (by using a slower shutter speed) would be nice, as would more sharpness. But a decent effort. Journalistic and artistic aren't mutually-exclusive. See Darren Heath's work, for example.
  3. Pushing him back in and getting ready for him to crash another one! :) I like it. A bit slower shutter speed for more blur would have been nice and, since the nose is chopped off anyway, maybe cropped a bit farther back on the right, but it's a very nice shot.
  4. Nah, if you could read the tires, it would look like the car's parked there. (And they say "Firestone", btw.) Very nice shot. Pan shots are tricky and I think you pretty much nailed this one. The other car in the background adds a lot, too, and it's nicely positioned relative to Adrian's car.

     

    Did you shoot this in 2000? That looks like Jimmy Vasser in the Ganassi car in the back.

  5. A polarizer would have probably helped with glare. Panning a 400 at slower shutter speeds is tricky, but a monopod would help. As for faking a slower shutter speed shot with Photoshop background blur, personally, I dislike that sort of fakery. But, if you tried it, you'd also have to somehow give the wheels more rotational blur.
×
×
  • Create New...