Jump to content

cegeiss

PhotoNet Pro
  • Posts

    2,079
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by cegeiss

  1. Yes, I've used it for years to batch process images taken in abysmal light. I like that it lets me decide where my files are and where they will go once processed. The PRIME noise reduction engine lets me shoot dimly lit field hockey games with an ancient camera. I also like how it renders colors for my images. One final bonus: it is not subscription based and I can decide when it's worth to upgrade - I just did: local adjustments seemed worth the money, previous upgrades seemed not. The new "Photo Lab" version is noticeably faster when running PRIME noise reduction - at least on my laptop.
  2. In rare instaces my polarizing filter gets stuck. Without a filter wrench, sidewall of a tire, freezer, or similar available I resorted to a shoe lace. I wrapped my boot lace around the filter, tightened it by twisting the shoe lace (using a pencil) and gently turning the filter. After a bit of wiggling and turning it came of nicely.
  3. A view of the Missouri River floodplain just north of Omaha, NE. I spent a brief day in the Midwest suffering from the intense 80-degree heat (it certainly felt like that after getting on a plane that morning in 40-degree Connecticut and doing fieldwork on some very sunny grassy hillsides). The image was taken in the early afternoon. I did very little to represent the warm, hazy mood of a warm spring day: I sharpened the foreground slightly and corrected a bit for vignetting to allow the eye to wander. Missouri River floodplain, Crescent, IA
  4. False sunrise: last week we headed out to cape Cod bay to look for bio-luminescent waters. Unfortunately the tide was out and the waters were calm, so there was no bioluminescent glow. :-( This image was taken with a small table-top tripod (from RSS) placed on the railing of the boardwalk. the "sunrise" glow are probably the lights of nearby Wellfleet. OM-D E-M1 with 12-40mm 1/2.8. 60 sec exposure at f/2.8 and base ISO.
  5. My 0.2 acre backyard has kept me busy for years. No, it is nowhere close to Monet's garden at Giverny. It's a deck, a crappy lawn, a swingset and sandbox for the kids, a few flowers, bushes ad trees. I might start a project taking one daily image of it.
  6. Earthquake damaged bridge - Nepal.
  7. Can you take a picture using the electronic shutter? Not sure whether it would help, but resetting the camera doesn't really cost you anything at this point. Taking the battery out and turning it on for a while helps for laptop computers when they get confused, it might work here as well. My E-M1 probably has some weird options where you can turn the rear screen and the EVF off, but is still should take a picture in that messed up configuration.
  8. Why don't you use a scale in at least some of your images? That works well for me for images ranging from the outcrop-, hand sample-, to microscopic-scale. My students roll their eyes when they have to serve as walking scale bars (jokes are routinely made concerning the perfect five-foot student). For soil profiles and smaller outcrops I have a dedicated plastic cards (the better ones double as gray cards for color correction), and for microscopy work I use a calibrated slide. That skips over the scale typically encountered in macro photography (my work does not require many images on that scale that cannot be taken with a good scope), but I don't see why it wouldn't work. Photoshop or freeware such as NIH image then does the rest.
  9. Would it be better to take numerous "short" exposures and stack them in Photoshop later? Might be worth a try.
  10. John, I am not sure I appreciate the green tree effect. Looks more like a St. Patrick's Day shot (and I never liked my beer green :-)) Christoph
  11. Funny enough, now a few hours later I can see the changes on my site too. Maybe it just takes forever.
  12. Leslie, I had the same issue. I went from colorful bubbles to a gray background. Probably better that way.
  13. I agree, photo.net seems to turn more into a "push editorial content.net" site. That starts at the home page, which used to be community and image centered, now wastes its prime real estate on a stock-photo and low-quality articles from photo.net editorial staff. I could go into more details (I did in an earlier draft), but after trying out the new site for a few days left me tired and not all that interested in it any longer. btw. The way to undo the ugly Christmas lights in my profile is about as straightforward as "finding the light switch in your new car - without a manual", right Glen? At least the hacked post on the front page is gone, but now you seem to have issues with your security certificates... :-(
  14. Second time around: I guess once you cancel an upload you might as well start from scratch. <br> The paragraph breaks clearly didn't work. Let's see whether some generic html code might provide a workaround. Captions can't be placed below the image, so we better figure out what we want to say before we include an image. Growing pains, I hope, since elsewhere on this site we were assured that the software used was written "by the best in the business". :-) In any case, here's another shot from Langtang valley, with the "hand of man" mostly hidden in the shadows. :-)
  15. Thank you Laura. Yes, it was a cool spot to be. We spent three weeks in Nepal. Unfortunately, most images will never make it into the Nature forum: too much evidence of the "hand of man". It is amazing to see an entire hillside, probably more than 1000 meters in relief, completely terraced. I'll post some pictures soon on my site. In the meantime, let's try to figure out these posts. Obviously I figured out how to post my pictures in decent size. So, now let's see whether that paragraph issue still exists. Another thing I noticed (I'll double check in a moment), we can't add captions to the image. Well, as it turns out, now I can't upload anything at all. All I get is "there was an error with your file" after I cancelled the first attempt. :-(
  16. I hadn't planned on a thumbnail, and can't figure out how to edit my post, so let's try it again. :)
  17. well, the original posts do not look promising. Let's give it a try
  18. <p>Gordon - I really like your image!</p>
  19. <p>Staying with the plant theme: brown oaks, and maybe the first hint of snow-covered tall mountains in the evening light. Clouds - snow ? We could never quite agree that evening.</p><div></div>
  20. <p>Great to be back after four weeks of hiking and exploring. Gancheng Po in the Langtang valley of Nepal.</p><div></div>
  21. cegeiss

    100 DSC_8832 fix

    Cool shot! The hazy background trees give just enough depth, but still leave a lot to the viewer's imagination.
  22. cegeiss

    No Worries Mate

    Great shot - I like the color contrast between the blue ocean / sky and the yellow light painting. Well done!
  23. cegeiss

    Rock needle at Vík

    Good composition. I like the rocks iin the foreground. I might have given the needle a bit more space at the top of the image.
  24. cegeiss

    100 DSC_9626 fix

    Tommy, I like it, but it doesn't wow me. Not sure whether it should - it's a nice, peaceful scene which probably shouldn't wow in the first place. :-) I agree with all the previous comments: the curved road leads to the church, the strong diagonals of the hillside I like them all. Since I wasn't blown away at first I thought hard what I might do differently, so here are my two cents: In my opinion, the white gate competes with the church a bit. I would prefer not to have it in the frame. The curved road leads to some lonely church ... Whether it is possible to have the curving road without the gate  I don't know. I might have tried to climb that little wall on the right of the gate to get the curving road and omit that little sliver of sky. Ideally I'd go for the church, the curved road and the green diagonals of the hillside. Would it work? Maybe, probably not, but I thought I''d  share my thoughts.
×
×
  • Create New...