![](http://content.invisioncic.com/l323473/set_resources_2/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
giuseppe_miriello1
-
Posts
1,136 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Image Comments posted by giuseppe_miriello1
-
-
wow!!! this is a really difficult macro to do!
-
this one seems too soft and provides less details on the dog...
-
very nice... a larger post would have been better.
-
i would have used a diffuser.... in fact the coffee cup seems flattered by too much direct light. otherwise a very good image :-)
-
i would have used a sharpening filter in ps to improve the softness of the image. well done
-
overally a well balanced image. since you put the road in foreground i would have liked to have it linked on some action! something recalling the high solitude of the place.. for example a lonely walker or a cyclist.
-
i don't know why.. but this sky seems really too fake! while the highlits seems burned and wih a yellow dominance... i would have more able to evaluate this if i had seen the real panoramic view :P
-
nice and simple.. maybe too red dominance on the subject too
-
the situation is really uncommon... but it would have been far better to take it from a different angle and - possibly with a tele. this way all the cicles looks very confusing
-
althouhg many could not appreciate your effort, this picture is very well done: first for the expression of the pilot!!! it is generally to get it so clearly. also the global framing gives the picture a great sense of motion. too bad that the picture lacks of greater color saturation.. probably a cloudy day? very good anyway
-
that's really nice! the man and the mountain and the vastity... very good :-)
-
i feel the background nude is too blurred. also its grey tonality is *too* near to flower's, so it would be advisable to retry the shoot - anyway quite good - using a deeper field and some filter to separate foreground and background tones
-
pointless image. there is a lack of main subject or strong foreground. trees are *too* caotic and add confusion to the image. but the idea is still good... probably retrying in a foggy day, using a b/w film and a tripod you could enhanche the cahotic nature of the place and avoid ugly shadows.
-
too underexposed.. the foreground boat is quite invisible as well as the trail it should leave. you should have spot measured the light on the boat and - to be sure - should have used a braketing.
-
is this a flame? i guess it is *too* underexposed. more vivid and saturated colours would have added to the picture that still remains a nice effort
-
very nice potrait... i really like the choiche of b/w film. it express the joy of the boys. very very very well done
-
underwater panning? wow.. that's nice. anyway the image could have been posted at higher resolution to allow seeing all details
-
this one is better... it renders the strenght of the waterfall and displaies a rainbow... though it is still flattered by water's haze... something that it wouldn't have been easy to avoid...
-
ok.. u have a super wide angle lens BUT u don't know how to use it!!! don't u see the shadows make the low part of the picture unreadable? finally the size is TOOO small to make any detail readable.
-
the image could be average BUT has been posted at TOO LOW resolution... jpg compression is excessively visible penalizing the whole work.
-
it lacks or strenght and it is bad composed.... a wave that hits rocks hard in foreground and the remaining in background would have been much stronger... also b/w films enhanche the mood of this kind of pictures. finally the look it is too "soft"... evidently a bad or uncleaned lens
-
tree's colours are magnificent, but the location isn't isn't excellent.. too many distracting background. the tree is not centered nor tilted on one of the frame's thirds...
-
i really cant see the point of the photo.... are those cavities eyes-like?
-
the mood is really nice... too bad the fallof at high sides... did u use too many filters??? generally the 35-70 f/2.8 nikkor doesn't have such fallof at sides - even at f/2.8... alternatively a firm tripod and a longer shutter speed - combined with much closure.. f/8 at least - could have brought you to better results...
10 past 8
in Uncategorized
Posted