Ricochetrider Posted August 12, 2023 Share Posted August 12, 2023 Article We know Kodak has been producing film for movies, including a whole new B&W film for the summer blockbuster, “Oppenheimer”. But this is a new twist with the top exec telling shareholders the will keep going as long as the demand for photographic film is there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanKlein Posted August 12, 2023 Share Posted August 12, 2023 9 minutes ago, Ricochetrider said: Article We know Kodak has been producing film for movies, including a whole new B&W film for the summer blockbuster, “Oppenheimer”. But this is a new twist with the top exec telling shareholders the will keep going as long as the demand for photographic film is there. From the article. It's a five-year contract with Alaris which means they apparently committed to five years. That's good for us users. I wish we could learn the terms of the deal between Kodak and Alaris. "Eastman Kodak will continue to make photographic film as long as there is demand, the film producer’s executive chairman said in a call to shareholders this week. Eastman Kodak’s CEO Jim Continenza made the pledge during the Q2 2023 earnings call on Wednesday (9 August). “We recently renewed our supply agreement for film with our long-term customer, Kodak Alaris in a deal that will run through 2028,” he said. “We are committed to manufacturing film as long as there is demand from the filmmakers and photographers worldwide." 1 Flickr gallery: https://www.flickr.com/photos/alanklein2000/albums Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJG Posted August 12, 2023 Share Posted August 12, 2023 Thanks for the article, but Kosmo Photo has the most annoying pop up ads that I have seen in a log time. I'm glad that Kodak will continue to produce film, but I hope that the recent price trends will subside a bit. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Katz Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 Each of the 30 theaters exhibiting in IMAX 70mm required a film print 11 miles long, weighing 600 lbs (purportedly). That plus the handful of theaters exhibiting the film in 35mm must have provided Kodak with a sweet little piece of business. Seriously, I believe that Kodak's film production is effectively underwritten by Hollywood studios commitment to purchase film for the movies shot on film stock. While still film sales have significantly improved, I don't know if that alone would make it economic for Kodak to continue making film. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricochetrider Posted August 13, 2023 Author Share Posted August 13, 2023 Ken Thanks for your comment. I agree that Kodak’s film production is almost certainly being driving by film (movie) production- just the fact that Kodak developed film stocks specifically for Mr Nolan does speak to this- but the “side” benefits trickle down directly to those of us who shoot still photos. 😊 Re: the claim of film spools 11 miles in length weighing in at 600 pounds must not be too egregiously exaggerated, as I’ve seen that repeated across the board in every article I’ve read on Oppenheimer- and in the “trivia” section of the movie’s IMDB page. BTW I saw the movie -although a digital copy in a “regular” theater; even so the B&W segments did indeed stand out in a strong way. I’d dearly love to see it in full-on IMAX glory, all 11 miles of it! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapaTango Posted August 15, 2023 Share Posted August 15, 2023 Something to consider: 1 "I See Things..." The FotoFora Community Experience [Link] A new community for creative photographers. Come join us! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Katz Posted August 15, 2023 Share Posted August 15, 2023 (edited) Really informative video on Kodak's current financial situation. Certainly much better use of my time than personally going through their financial statements. Its quite clear that film production is not the activity that is keeping the lights on in Rochester. Also interesting that it is likely that Kodak is producing film under contract for Fuji, for the US market. Saw Oppenheimer in glorious 35mm the other night. More of an accident, by choosing to see the film at the local Arts theater. Didn't realize it was a 35mm expedition until we got to the theater. It was fine, with just a few visible signs that it was film running through a rather ancient projector. The shallow DOF of the IMAX and 70mm source was noticeable. As with most movies these days, found it to be about 20 minutes too long. Edited August 15, 2023 by Ken Katz 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c_watson1 Posted August 16, 2023 Share Posted August 16, 2023 FYI, XX isn't a "new" film; 65mm sliced from master rolls is a new format. Kosmo, like others, never reports times series numbers for actual production, so "comfort" press releases are almost meaningless. Statements like "film sales have significantly improved" never include a footnote. Hats off to PapaTango for the the financial statement reality check video the fabulists should watch and take notes from. For most civilians, rising film material/chemistry costs and shrinking access to ever-pricey lab services is killing the mood. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert_ante Posted August 25, 2023 Share Posted August 25, 2023 Even a digitally shot movie must be transferred to film for storage and archival purposes. Storing a movie on film is much, much cheaper than storing digitally. Film can be kept in abandoned mines with constant temperatures at very little cost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glen_h Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 On 8/25/2023 at 5:18 AM, robert_ante said: Even a digitally shot movie must be transferred to film for storage and archival purposes. Storing a movie on film is much, much cheaper than storing digitally. Film can be kept in abandoned mines with constant temperatures at very little cost. When digital TV came out, there was much discussion about how people in low signal areas would fare. Weak analog TV gives a slightly snowy picture, but is otherwise watchable. FM sound works pretty well with low signal. But digital either works or doesn't, and at low signal it often doesn't. You could store digital copies in mines, even stores on analog movie film. But if it deteriorates, it is gone, not just snowy. Good ways to store analog photographic materials for the long term have been well developed. Not so well for digital storage systems. -- glen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDMvW Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 On 8/12/2023 at 2:29 PM, Ricochetrider said: keep going as long as the demand for photographic film is there This is, of course, the "catch". I remember the "Apple ][ forever" of Apple Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricochetrider Posted February 19 Author Share Posted February 19 Time will tell, eh? Meanwhile Kodak dropped prices on some films recently. What does that say about their finances? KODAK PRICE DROPS ARTICLE BTW it’s not entirely old news, this happened at the end of 2023. Might have been a seasonal promo? The above link & screen shot below are from the same period, I believe. Next time I see my buddy at Retro Photo Reading I’ll ask him about it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now