riton_mhilli Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 <p>Hello all<br> Did anyone try full stand development in hc110 1+100 for 1 hour with any film.Every comment very much apreciated<br> Thanks Riton</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larrydressler Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 <p>I find that one hour at 1+100 is too long. Even Dilution G 1+119 was. The magic spot seems to be dilution G at 45 minutes. No I did not have any bromide drag with it.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User_502260 Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 <p>Does it matter which film you develop for 45 minutes at 1: 119?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larrydressler Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 <p>I only tried Neopan 400,Tri-X and PolypanF so far. all were rated at box speed. so far so fine. 20C.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
christer_almqvist2 Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 <p ><a href="../photodb/user?user_id=502260">Jeff Adler</a> <a href="../member-status-icons"><img title="Frequent poster" src="../v3graphics/member-status-icons/1roll.gif" alt="" /></a>, Dec 01, 2011; 08:50 a.m.</p> <p>Does it matter which film you develop for 45 minutes at 1: 119? UNQUOTE</p> <p>Probably not.<br> And it doesn't matter if you use Rodinal either. <br> With Rodinal, either 1:100 or 1:150 is OK, so 1+119 should be fine.<br> Fine, yes. But not better than 1:25 or 1:50............... And, I'm dead serious.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicaglow Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 <p>I started out doing stand development with HC-110, and it is a very good developer. I do find it to be finer grain than Rodinal, but a little harder to control the highlights (densest part of the negative). I don't have my dilution in front of me, but I think you're all on the right track. I wouldn't go over 1 hour with it though. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_redmann Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 <p><strong>Hold on a minute--<em>which</em> HC-110?</strong></p> <p>At least at one time (and I think still), the basic dilution of the HC-110 that Kodak sold varied in different markets. For example, with US-spec HC-110, most photographers seemed to use 1+32 or 1+64 and fairly normal development times (say 5 to 15 minutes). However, as I recall, European-spec HC-110 was sold a lot more diluted, and the normal consumer dilutions were much less, like 1+4, 1+8, or 1+10 or something like that, so 1+100 would be a lot more diluted, and maybe appropriate for one hour stand developing. The way to convert back and forth between dilutions was to use Kodak's letters, like Dilution G or whatever. But for this discussion, we really need to know which HC-110 product we're talking about. Right?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterbcarter Posted December 2, 2011 Share Posted December 2, 2011 <p>I got started doing stand development with HC110. The results were usually quite good. Like Larry suggested, there is a sweet spot. I found 1:100 at 35-55 minutes were good for most normal films. Like everything else, test your times. Start at 45, then go in blocks of 5 mins in any direction you need to go.</p> <p>I don't know why I stopped.... Maybe I'll do a roll today....</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riton_mhilli Posted December 12, 2011 Author Share Posted December 12, 2011 <p>Thank you</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now