User_6502147

<p>Ellis, for a large vehicle such as Sprinter (MB version), it will give you excellent mileage. The other way to do this is to get a light pickup truck such as Chevy or even Dodge Dakota and get a shell or even build (if you're handy) the shell for your needs.</p> <p>Les</p> <p> </p>

<div></div>

<div></div>

<div></div>

<p>Try contacting Vespa in Europe...it appears as this pic is part of their marketing. They may have a clue which agency did the photo.</p> <p>Les</p>

<p>We may have to carry with us some sort of a document....what photography in public space is about...and stamp of approval by the FBI. Somehow it has this sovietski aroma to it.</p> <p>Les</p>

<p>It's relative as to what you're after. Mountain reflection in the lake may call for a different lens than a specific detail of the mountain/s that you find interesting. I've used 400mm + 1.4ext on some interesting details of Mt McKinley and down to 24mm, as well...and everything in between. Below is a view that opened up (on a hike) on the way down from Mt Lassen. The visible road (barely) is at appx at 8,300', so the peak is around 9,000'.</p> <p>Les</p><div></div>

<div></div>

<p>This was a surprise that I even got the shot....</p><div></div>

<p>Harry, what about Vuescan ? Also, were you doing 35mm or 6x6....and how that would compare....to something like Plustek 120/35 ? Would love to see some visual references or comparisons (if possible).</p> <p>Les</p>

<div></div>

<p>I've been using a CF Feisol for tall folks (CT-3371) and it's light and stout. Most of the time I use it in conjunction with Manfrotto 410 head. Also, I'm big fan of 3-legs and w/o the middle column for better stability. Indeed, you can add more weight by using sand, bricks, water, etc. I've used it (around 2 yrs) in salt/fresh water and sand...and it's still performing v. well.</p> <p>But, aside from solid support, you need to look at the tripod head, as well. I wouldn't hesitate anything (w/weight consideration) from Markins, Arca-Swiss, RRS, FLM and few others.</p> <p>Les</p>

<p>That would be the time to have an extra battery on hand, eh ?</p> <p>Les</p>

<p>I came to conclusion that even if I had D4s, my photos would not improve all that much. I'd, however, spring for some top notch (specific) lenses. No doubt I'd do more 5x7 and 4x5....and probably hire a super good printer. Prefer to concentrate on photos and have no desire to smell the chemicals. Yes, definiately do more travel and exploration. Hmmm, so not a whole lot would change from present....as I'm comfortable with what I have.</p> <p>Les</p>

<p>I'm kind of eying it, since it will accommodate my new 20mm.. Metz products were always high quality...from 60's on (at least the ones I came in contact with).</p> <p>Les</p>

<p>If I were in your shoes, I'd likely rent an appropriate lens. This way I wouldn't be under pressure to get something, that eventually you may realize, that's not much use to you. Agree, tripod is essential. To be on the safe side, take several takes...to make sure <strong>everyone</strong> has their eyes open.</p> <p>Les</p>

<p>Unfortunately the *bay is not the end-of-it-all and you could find more info or availability of such holders on LF forum. If you become a member, you'll be able to purchase from the *for sale* portion of the forum in 30 days.</p> <p>I just scoured some previous threads and found many 6x7 or 6x9 graflock adapters for sale. On rare occasion you can spot a 6x12 too. True, it will take some patience, but you should be able to find something that works for you. If you are really lucky, you may spot some of these on CL....though I'd look for it in a larger metro areas.</p> <p>As an alternative, you can put in your need under *WTB*. Good luck.</p> <p>Les</p>

<p>Bob, try Godaddy. Not sure what exactly they offer, but they do hosting and offer domains. I'm in the process of designing my site and I find it much much easier than Zenfolio...and I'm able to create the look that I need. I don't think I need to tell you, that this sort of customization usually comes to $$$'s. Zenfolio does not offer phone help unless you are purchasing the top tier option. Godaddy is there 24/7...and it doesn't take 3 weeks of emailing notes back and forth to resolve one tiny issue. I presume you can set up your own account with Mpix (printer)...and have them follow ????</p> <p>Good luck and let us know what you ended up with.</p> <p>Les</p>

<p>I often run around with particular lens on the camera....and usually I'll take the shot with it if action unfolds in the front of me. If I want to get specific, I'll go for macro or tele/wide and attach to the camera what's needed. </p> <p>If a person wants to cover entire range with one lens then a belt-holster (a pouch) or use a belt clip-on gismo. Depends what works for you.</p> <p>If you have a DSLR body and a lens in the bag....it will take time to mount the lens. Either way, it takes time.</p> <p>Les</p>

<p>Except for the outside scene/s I find the entire video on a darkish side or roughly 1-1.5 F-stop underexposed. Sometimes it's the interior lighting, but it appears that this should have been part of the homework of the videographer and accentuate the existing situation with extra light units. If that's not doable, then the camera would have to be able to compensate for that with higher ISO's.<br> Perhaps I'm from the old school and adequate coverage is everything. That means 2 vid cameras are being used (preferably) at the same time from different angles. For instance, one could be on the tripod while the other is on some form of steadycam rig (allowing fluid movements)....and having better access to the action. This permits for interesting inter cutting of transitions vs all footage from one and only angle. <br> In the end the editing has to rock (or having things to cut to) is just as essential as the main action itself. No amount of razzle dazzle can compensate for "footage in the can". Sometimes cut-away scenes (of onlookers) have just as much spark as the action that's unfolding. Anyway, to be able to cut away to the other camera....you can avoid showing wort's or hints of such, like bad composition or OOF shots, etc. By the way, there are always various static or dynamic details that one can cut-away to.<br> I'm little critical, since I had extensive training in film making; therefore, I'd rate it at around 6.5. <br> <br />The bottom line, however, is whether the B&G like the piece and it doesn't matter much what anyone says about it.</p> <p>Les</p> <p>Disclaimer: I have not listened to the sound.</p>

<p>I got the entire set + big stopper and haven't used it yet. Well, part of it had to do with being on several ferrys recently. But, I intend to use the grads....hmm, even in a combo with a pola filter. Hope to do some balanced landscapes soon.</p> <p>Les</p>

<p>Have seen many bees and even turkey vultures when I escaped recently for a few days to San Juan Islands. Here is one from my mini vacation.</p><div></div>

<p>If that was me, I'd rent digital medium format (Hassy or Phase One). You may also need to elevate yourself to some degree, so a cherry picker would be useful. But, it would be more solid if you shot the photo from a building (higher spot). Anyway, tripod and curtain up...to get the most clarity. <br> Les</p>

I've taken couple of approaches in the last couple of years. This one is from 2012. But I also shot one fireworks exclusively with Nikkor 105/2.5, ISO 280, F4.0 and most of the 'works were shot with 1/125 or 1/180/sec. Not sure what the sweet spot is, but longer exposure will likely give better results. Les<div></div>

<p>Well, maybe the sky is falling somewhere, but I'm expecting real good blackberry crop. :>)</p> <p>Les</p><div></div>