Jump to content

mgvaughan.com

Members
  • Posts

    897
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by mgvaughan.com

    X_3

          4

    It's a straight camera blur of trees.

     

    For those of you compelled to rate this it's really subjective. Shots like this are used for product backgrounds and textures for brochures. Of course it could be framed as an abstract wall piece. But, that's a personal choice. In short, don't rate it. Just add a few suggestions about abstract blurs. Thanks

    barabashka

          6
    The eyes look almost fake. Perhaps too big and too light compared to the forehead. Overall, a powerful, disturbing image. The second child doesn't bother me. If in PS- you desaturate the second child.

    X_3

          4

    I spent a sunset creating motion blurs in my frontyard- this photo

    was one of them. Photos of this nature are hard to critique. Do you

    have alternative ideas for blurs imvolving either equipment or

    technique?

  1. No point of interest is fine with me. My eyes are drawn to the rock texture, mist and rich color. Overall it seems tranquil in spite of the apparent high tempuratures.

     

    Next time you might wait a for an animal to wander by. Then you will have a center of interest for broader appeal. Personally, I think it's a nice shot.

    Muldovan Violinist

          149

    Nice photo- the motion of the bow and blowing hair, unusual stare into the camera while playing and cropping add to the appeal. I would call it successful. Did you by chance shoot a series you could post?

     

    Take the criticism for what it's worth and enjoy some notariety. Photo.net has photographers worth listening to.

×
×
  • Create New...