Not Here
-
Posts
19,575 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by Not Here
-
Wayne: Ahhh, looks to be near St. Charles Avenue. Jump on board and head on down to the restaurants. Makes me want some etouffee. Well done in b/w... Mike -
Dominic: An excellent street shot, a variety of personalities, smog fighters, man-spread, Mickey Mouse and the omnipresent cell phone. Well done in b/w... Mike -
Ken: Good shot of this interesting character (a chimney sweep I assume)... Mike -
Radu: Beautiful flowers and an excellent still life; along with great post work... Mike -
Tm: I can't imagine a more perfect day. Excellent shot... Mike -
LOL, good one. Leslie Reid is my hero, I only wish she was in charge... Mike
-
Lannie: It's like going from your favorite neighborhood restaurant to a new, glitzy place. The food may, or may not, be better, but the atmosphere is sterile, all the faces are different. Maybe someday you will feel at home in the new place, but at the moment it sure doesn't feel right. Hang in there... Mike
-
Shun: Not to belabor the issue, but you have missed my point dramatically! My point is that the programming language is not the issue, it's function. If the old language doesn't work anymore then fine, issue a new version in a different or new language; but don't reinvent the wheel and make it square. I am not advocating a return to V1, just a functioning V2. As for user feedback, V2 should've already contained all that was in V1 and discussion should be about how to improve on that, not how to fix a faulty product.... Mike
-
Katherine: Fantastic, it captures the fierce intensity of this magnificent bird. Uncle Sam can be proud... Mike -
I haven't tried to understand but I have noticed that some Canon cameras report the full EXIF data that we're used to seeing. When I saw that I incorrectly assumed the bug was fixed, it isn't. My D750 reports the same erroneous numbers... Mike
-
Holger: Wow, a unique and beautiful starfish. Very well done... Mike -
Falls, Hawaiian Tropical Botanical Gardens
Not Here commented on rarmstrong's gallery image in Landscape
Dick: Yeah, the composition is perfect and you know I like forest waterfalls. My bucket list keeps growing... Mike -
Greg: Exceptional clarity and detail, not to mention great color. Well done... Mike -
Mehrdad: A fine action shot with excellent timing... Mike -
Christal: Mysterious, timeless, waiting, so many feelings here. Love it. Thanks for taking us along on your vagabond travels ;-)... Mike -
"Mallard Fillmore"? You know we read that in Alabama ;-). This Mallard is a handsome guy with bright color and a smug look. Well done... Mike -
Christal: A wonderful place to browse, dogs are welcome, an owner with a sense of humor (watch the 3 steps) and I've actually read some of those books. Sad that this media, both bookstores and newspapers, is losing out to ebooks and social tabloids. Love this in b/w... Mike -
Christal: At first I thought this was a zip line station but a closer look makes me think that a kid has a great place to play. Well done in b/w... Mike -
Christal: A building with both function and character. Love it... Mike -
Christal: Not sure what it used to be but a real shame it hasn't been restored. I love stone buildings like this and find it amusing that they used less decorative stones where originally hidden from view... Mike -
Christal: Great shot of this iconic spot. The soft sunset is a good balance to the rough shoreline. I like the old, weathered lighthouse peeking around the corner... Mike -
Christal: Yeah, we could like this place. Beautiful scene... Mike -
Christal: Excellent color, reflections and a romantic view of a hard working industry... Mike -
Good for you! So many of the whiners that beg for comments offer none of their own. Not a very descriptive writer, I many times offer the dreaded "Good shot" but I'm always grateful to receive even short responses, it means someone stopped and looked. Hopefully the recipients will feel the same .... Mike
-
Shun: I think I can comfortably speak for many of the 10+ year users when I say that we don't really care what the language is, or was, or what it was changed to or from. I am not a forum person but have followed this help topic religiously since the switch and what I see is that the vast majority of users are concerned about function. It's inconceivable to me that the programmers or managers or whoever didn't sit down with V1 and make a chart of the pages and functions before throwing out an untested new product and ask users to make lists of their preferences. I've said this before and have yet to receive a denial; it's my observation that V2 was promoted, planned, programmed and is now being retrofitted by a team that do not use the photo critique side of this site. If they were users this version would've never been released in such a sad state and they would've included all the functions of V1. That said, the graphics are better and functions are slowly being added, albeit in strange places. I look forward to the finished (functional) product... Mike
