Leonard-just-Leonard

hmmm... I just bought one that only does 4.3 trillion... wonder if I can trade it in?

<p>is there a limit to how many photos you can place in a Presentation folder?<br> when I scroll down my Presenation "Prints for Sale", it is not showing all the images I have added to Make available for purchase, which is what I set this folder up for.<br> it is only showing 34 shots. it also does this when I preview the presentation<br> the following I made available for sale, but are not appearing in my Prints for Sale presenation<br> <a href="/photo/17831404">http://www.photo.net/photo/17831404</a><br> <a href="/photo/17831813">http://www.photo.net/photo/17831813</a><br> <a href="/photo/17831992">http://www.photo.net/photo/17831992</a><br> please advise<br> thanks<br> Leonard</p>

<p>Wow, some folks here get down right emotional about their photos... that's good and bad of course</p> <p>Anyhow, nice to see the feedback... One final note, yesterday I went back to Waterton hoping to improve on a sunrise shot I took Aug 1st. Fortunately it rained again and was a cool morning, creating the fog I wanted to see.</p> <p>NO MOVIES this time. Every shot was a single frame, and I was lucky the fog was thick enough I had almost an hour to work with.</p> <p>Regardless of all the previouse discussion, I feel that somehow I "earned" this shot more becasue it was a one shot capture, not a series of move stills. The Karma was right and that's all the explanation it needs.</p><div></div>

<p>Almost all my photography is nature/wildlife... the outdoors thing... once in a blue moon people such as family only if they ask on special occasions.</p> <p>Anywho, about a month ago a black bear and three cubs were no more than 15 feet away from me at Cameron lake ( not by <em><strong>my</strong></em> choice ) They came out of the woods to feed at the boat launch and exhibit area. I never thought of shooting video at the time because I consider myself a photographer, if even I am just an amateur. I wanted to make sure I got the shots and high quality ones to boot.</p> <p>Looking back now after running the video of the pelicans just for the h**l of it, would video have served me better with momma and the cubs?</p> <p>I think video chews up way too much precious battery power and really takes the challenge out of the sport and the artisty out of the art. Hopefully the next time I see one of those "once in a lifetime" action scenarios I have the presence of mind to flip over to video and leave the philisophical debates about purity of art to landscapes and birds sitting in trees.</p>

<p>I used some video editing program (not sure which one avi-something?) to save the single frame as a bmp file. Then I used ACDC to convert to a jpeg since photoshop would not read the file (wrong format)</p> <p>Once in Photoshop all I did was bring the curves down a bit and crop it to fit a standard 4x6 print. I can't remember if I did autoadjust on contrast or not. The camera - Nikon Coolpix P600 shoots in HDMI so the quality was pretty good to start with.</p> <p> </p>

<p>So, today I finally tried to take a single frame capture from a video I shot from with my camera. Does that really count as a photograph, since I snagged it from a quicktime movie I took? I mean really, what's the difference between that and shooting at 60 frames per second?</p> <p>It turned out OK... the thing is I tried for the past 3 days just to get a shot of the fish inside a pelican's pouch as they gulped them down... I used 7 fps burst mode and managed to get a couple shots, but they were not good enough. Annoyed I did the video thing today and eventually looked at it and realized I did get one shot of many fish in the pouch.</p> <p>Some photo contests rules I have read in the past do NOT consider video capture frames to be "real" photographs... Does photo.net have any rules about this?</p><div></div>