Jump to content

steve_d6

Members
  • Posts

    108
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by steve_d6

  1. <p>Other than the contrasting dials and the Ti finish on the TLX, is there any real difference between the two generations of this camera? The dimensions are identical and they share the exact same lens. I'm looking for any technical improvements Minox may have incorporated into the last generation.<br />I'm just trying to determine if there is a justification in seeking a TLX when I have an LX.<br />Oh yes, where does the Aviator and CLX fall? Are they of the LX family or the TLX?<br />Steve</p>
  2. <p>Hi,<br>

    I just obtained a very nice 1980 LX complete with the original clam shell display case, measuring chain, instruction book and papers, and red leather case. The leather case is of the same design as the older C Model cases where the flap is the entire length of the camera.<br>

    I noticed the cut-out for the lens was not properly centered over the lens itself. In fact, the case's lens opening was situated in such a way it might even vignette the image. Then I realized the LX is secured to the case by a screw device in the case. All it took was to turn the fastening screw a half turn or so to get the lens centered in the leather case opening. No need to enlarge the opening with a chisel and knife!<br>

    Steve</p>

  3. <p>Martin and Simon, very nice pics. They really show off what a stunning lens the Minox 35 has!<br />You may wish to review the availabel info for your newly acquired Minox. Here's a starter <a href="http://www.submin.com/35mm/collection/minox/index.htm">http://www.submin.com/35mm/collection/minox/index.htm</a><br />Yes, originally they came with a PX 27.<br />As far as the battery question, it's been discussed before. Here's some info: <a href="../minox-camera-forum/003HJn">http://www.photo.net/minox-camera-forum/003HJn</a><br />Steve</p>
  4. <p>Hi Martin,<br>

    I don't have any of the threaded filters you mention. I'd prefer to just look for a good Series size to match the 'Arc' of the binocular clamp. They are very inexpensive and plentiful.<br>

    I'm thinking the Series III or IV may be right. I might actually have to buy one to try out. Ebay is full of them. Alternatively, if you have the filter diameter fitting the best, I could ask sellers how close theirs come to the ideal diameter.<br>

    Steve</p>

  5. <p>to easily load onto a reel.<br>

    I spend forever trying to load two rolls in my dark room. It is so thin, it would easily bind and not fully load. At least twice I had to take the reel apart and start over. It would wrinkle, bind up and so forth.<br>

    Is there a technique you can share? I can load film when using other thicker films without much problem. I suppose someone may suggest buying another plastic processing tank with reels hoping for a different result, but I thought I'd check here first.<br>

    Steve</p>

  6. <p>Hi,<br>

    I pulled out two backs to verify if they'd be good for a trip. They were fine a few years ago.<br>

    Problems with each:<br>

    (1) This one will cycle through all septums but at the end when it reaches the 'X' position, it doesn't lock in place. It will still allow a pull on the handle to remove the 'guts' of the back. Not a disaster if you are aware of the situation, but I'd prefer it work properly. Any quick way to fix short of a tear-down? Is a tear-down dooable?<br>

    (2) This one seems to work OK when sqeezing the removal handle and the latch. It properly pulls out the guts to cycle things inside. But, when I pull the slide to expose the septum and film, the film moves forward, but the little flag doesn't retract and show the little red dot. You have to again pull and push the slide very hard to jar the back to cause the back to retract the red dot shade. Alternatively, when the slide is pulled, if I can push the little covering flag back into the body to reveal the dot. Again, quick fix or total tear-down?<br>

    Steve</p>

  7. <p>Hi,<br>

    I learned the attachment has the 'hidden' capability of allowing the use of filters for the Minox. It is expecially helpful for the LX series where the clip on filters can't be employed.<br>

    I attached one to my LX camera and dug out my bag of Series VI filters from my Graflex. They, unfortunately are too big to conform to the clamp of the attachment. <br>

    Anyone have an idea as to an 'ideal' size? Series III or IV? They were made in all smaller sizes to accomodate 'Cine' photography of the day. They are typically of super quality.<br>

    Steve</p>

  8. <p>Hi,<br />I need help from some with Minox Engineering backgrounds!! University degrees are optional!<br />I cut some film using a fabled Ray Pepalis flat-bed film slitter. It is a jewel.<br />It produces four rolls of 36 exposure film and two 'short' rolls of approximately 7-10 exposure film. These last two rolls are very short of a typical 15 exposure roll.<br />I'm concerned about the use of the usual 36 roll take-up spool with such a short load. To clarify I don't have any of the larger spools typically used with shorter loads.<br />To simplify things, I'd like to know whether it'd be OK to use the regular 36 exp. take-up spool, set the camera to the usual little red mark prior to the 36 exposure counter and shoot seven to ten exposures. After all, the camera and the spool don't know how much film is the the other side of the cassette. It will happily go about pulling the film evenly as if there was plenty to go. I should think it'd save a lot of 'calculation' when using: (1) a short load, (2) a smaller 36 spool and (3) starting the camera at a 'guestamate' of about the 11 spot or thereabouts.<br />Anyone else have any comments? If this is the way to go, all I have to do is place a piece of tape on the camera and mark it to indicate the film ends at number 26 or so. Am I making too much of this?<br />Steve</p>
  9. <p>So far my experience has been great. I've sent a few rolls to them and the customer service is top notch. Please notice I didn't write the print results were at the apex of photography, but that's an issue from my use of the camera!<br>

    They are very customer oriented and will call or email when the results are being sent out.<br>

    The only issue I have is the ultra small prints available as a standard. The prints are 3.25 x 2.25 inches. "Enlargements" to 4.75 x 3.25 inches are available, but at a dollar (US) per print.<br>

    <a href="http://www.bluemooncamera.com/Minox_Frequently_Asked_Questions.php">http://www.bluemooncamera.com/Minox_Frequently_Asked_Questions.php</a><br>

    Interesting, I was going over their website and they offer Double Eight movie film in color or B+W. I haven't seen that in 25 years. Amazing. I may have to start looking for the wind up Bell and Howell camera if the developing is avialable too.<br>

    Steve</p>

  10. <p>First prep what you need to do: (1) You'll need to remove the cover from the feeding side of the cassete. (2) Go into a dark room and remove the feeding side cover. (3) Feel if the cylinder is full of film or empty. If it feels full, then you know it has shots to go. If it feels empty, pull the tail out to verify the film is at an end. It'll only have a couple of inches left to it.<br>

    Interestingly, I recently had to do just this very exercise. I found the film was exposed. Now, I have to take an 'educated' guess as to whether it is b+w or color!!</p>

  11. <p>I picked up another tripod. This one doesn't have two slots cut all the way through the leg. One is certainly cut through to allow for the insertion of a coin. The other side is not cut all the way. Instead, there is a slight half-way cut to accept the edge of the coin, and it is located on the inside of the cylinderical leg.<br /><br />I see no advantage to either. For manufacturing purposes, it may have been easier to make only one full cut as it would reduce the sharp edges to clean-up.<br />Steve</p>
×
×
  • Create New...