Minox/Miniature
3,220 topics in this forum
-
- 3 replies
- 60 views
-
- 7 replies
- 233 views
-
- 0 replies
- 69 views
-
- 0 replies
- 38 views
-
- 4 replies
- 95 views
-
- 4 replies
- 80 views
-
- 2 replies
- 66 views
-
- 1 reply
- 61 views
-
- 6 replies
- 61 views
-
- 0 replies
- 78 views
-
- 0 replies
- 63 views
-
- 1 reply
- 61 views
-
- 2 replies
- 124 views
-
- 2 replies
- 163 views
-
- 0 replies
- 59 views
-
- 2 replies
- 99 views
-
- 6 replies
- 97 views
-
- 0 replies
- 80 views
-
- 0 replies
- 59 views
-
- 5 replies
- 111 views
-
- 0 replies
- 72 views
-
- 0 replies
- 91 views
-
- 6 replies
- 184 views
-
- 2 replies
- 108 views
-
- 2 replies
- 101 views
-
- 2 replies
- 112 views
-
- 1 reply
- 83 views
-
- 0 replies
- 81 views
-
- 1 reply
- 106 views
-
- 0 replies
- 79 views
-
- 3 replies
- 158 views
-
- 0 replies
- 102 views
-
- 2 replies
- 96 views
-
- 12 replies
- 128 views
-
- 1 reply
- 76 views
-
Who's Online 26 Members, 0 Anonymous, 760 Guests (See full list)
- Bettendorf
- Sandy Vongries
- john_nell
- Gianluigi Albanese
- robert_bouknight1
- Bill Snell
- mahyar
- Gerald Cafferty
- Jack Lunn
- John Farrell
- conrad_hoffman
- Bill J Boyd
- Jenifer Selwa Photography
- Tony Parsons
- john_haslach
- dmanthree
- Rob Davies
- kayardomy
- Christinne
- mary_harrington
- luciano_boero
- luis triguez
- Sanford
- dan d. chang
- Ken Katz
- Jack Usage
-
Recent Gallery Images
-
Recent Forum Wide Posts
-
By Bettendorf · Posted
Sandy, I have regularly posted just one photo in the last few days. I sized it to 1100 on the horizontal for a little extra oomph, and it fell to 700 on the other. It wouldn't take it and I got the B&W exclamation point telling me so. I tried 2 more times, no luck. So I resized to good old 1000 and it took it. I did this on a recent iMac using Brave for a browser. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. -
By Jack Usage · Posted
Thank you very much for your replies! I’m out of my depth here and maybe outside my budget. I have all kinds of respect for photographers for many reasons, not least of which is the astronomical cost of good gear. -
If you are using Lightroom or an equivalent DAM (Digital Asset Manager) program that allows you to synchronize metadata among images, the following work around will let you add GPS data to your images using your cell phone: 1) Insure your camera clock agrees with your cell phone clock so your camera images have to correct date and time. 2) Set your cell phone to include date, time and GPS data with images you take with the cell phone. This is normally the default. 3) When you take images with your camera, take at least one image with your cell phone. 4) Load both the camera images and the cell phone images to you PC and import into Lightroom or your DAM. You may have the camera and cell phone images in separate file folders if you wish. 5) Display your images in Grid view sorted by Capture Time. Since the camera clock and the cell phone clock are synchronized (see step 1 above), the cell phone image, with the GPS data, will be near the camera images on the grid. The image name should make the cell phone image easy to identify. 6) Select the cell phone image as primary by clicking on it first. Hold the CTL key down and select the camera images from the same location as secondary images. 7) Release the CTL key and click SYNC METADATA (lower right hand corner of the screen in my copy of Lightroom). Click Select None and then select GPS data under Camera Info in the pop-up window and be sure nothing else is selected but GPS data is selected. 8 Click on SYNCHRONIZE. Lightroom will copy the GPS data from the phone image to the camera images selected. Will this give you the accuracy of a land survey? No. But unless you need in camera GPS for legal reasons or you are a professional and your client requires in camera tamper proof GPS data associated with each image, this should be close enough for most purposes. Ten years from now, you will know where you took that image. -
If only your friend could create the contents of some of that packaging! I had a Kodak Tray and Tank Thermometer at one point. As I recall it was reasonably accurate. -
(800x800).thumb.jpg.c94833d6ea93605f47351873a94fc0cc.jpg)
By Sandy Vongries · Posted
I have tried all sorts of variations, source, size and method. The few times I have succeeded are no different from the much greater numbers of failures. Seems random. It will be much appreciated if anyone who has regularly succeeded in posting photos can supply details of their computer set up and methodology. Thanks!
-
.jpg.a55dc60a6732896c8948b916c92d48c4.jpg)
(800x800).thumb.jpg.c94833d6ea93605f47351873a94fc0cc.jpg)