Jump to content

a._valerio

Members
  • Posts

    188
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by a._valerio

  1. Hi,

     

    Is this a good time to sell FD lenses? Or do you think the value will increase

    in a year or so? I have a perfect 50-135/3.5 in original packaging that I

    bought new 7 years ago, and only used for several rolls of film. Should I put

    it up for sale at this point in time? I would say it is worth about $250. Does

    that sound right? Or might it appreciate in value?

     

    Thank you very much!

  2. B&H no longer has EPJ 320T listed; the search returns no results/ It looks

    like the film might be on its way out. Anyone know? It also looks like EPT

    160T might be on its way out as well judging be the lack of fresh-dated film

    in the listing. Perhaps Kodak is discontinuing all its Tungsten films...First

    Portra 100T, and now the reversal films (we'll have to see about EPY 64T).

     

    Production of EBX 100 daylight film seems to have been stopped a long time

    ago, btw.

  3. "Commercial film recording apparatus is usually pretty low-res kit. Typically giving you the sort of resolution you'd get by shooting the image from a computer CRT monitor with a film camera."

     

    What?! I thought the whole point of this process was to be able to work with a digital image in the darkroom. I'm sorry, but I can't believe that a typical film recorder nothing more than a toy that gives such low quality. This thread caught my interest because I am planning to have some stuff converted for the first time...with the intention of being able to work with the images in the darkroom.

  4. FYI on processing according to the Dwaynes ebay store:

     

    "Please be assured that you will be able to get your film processed by Dwayne's Photo for at least the next 3 years. The only Kodachrome processor in the U.S."

     

    Assuming they mean "Kodachrome" when they say "film", this is good news. This seems to cover the 75th year of Kodachrome. As someone who is new to the film, I will use it 'til we lose it.

  5. "If I do this right, create one heck of a buzz, hand a hundred rolls of 64 out to kids to shoot, perhaps Kodak will see it through to it's 75th anniversary in 2010. It would be a brilliant PR move for them to do that and I am starting to think that is what they might do. But it is up to us to show them that it is worth it."

     

    I'm doing my part...I posted in another forum about this, and I'm urging people I know to give this stuff a shot. I'm also switching to K-64 as my main color slide material, and will shoot it until it's gone and processing is stopped. Sort of like a mini version of your own project. I want to be a part of photographic history. This is too big a deal to just ignore. Perhaps others can do a mini version of your Kodachrome Project. Personally, I am looking forward to seeing the project. Hopefully you will consider exhibiting some prints and circulating them around the country as an exhibition when all the shooting, editing, and storytelling is said and done.

     

    Best of luck.

  6. I recently pushed a roll of Kodachrome 200 by one stop. I rated the EI at 320 to decrease low-tone clipping. EI 400 would have definitely underexposed the film. I was shooting a rock concert. my slides came back well-exposed, but with little shadow detail and a definite warm cast due to the lighting. My metering method was to spotmeter performers' faces and to add 0.7EV to compensate for the flesh tone (the ISo was set to 320 in addition to this). If I were doing it over again, I would have maybe tried to add a filter to balance the film to the tungsten light a bit more. note that there is a definite shift toward magenta in pushed K-200, so if your lighting is greenish, it will help counteract it.
×
×
  • Create New...