-
Posts
318 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by sngreen
-
-
Hello,
Is it possible to increase the image size limit to at least 1000px wide (or
tall) and 500k? I noticed that once marginally larger images are uploaded, they
get downsized to where they start showing very pronounced artifacts. Not only it
makes difficult to judge the abilty of the camera/lens but at times almost
impossible to tell if the image is in focus to begin with.
Thank you,
- Sergey
-
Peter, would you comment on why the choice is clear?
- Sergey
-
This is very strange forum indeed! I typed in rather long answer, previewed it, clicked on 'Notify me of responses' and my entire text is gone!
Anyway, go figure yourself, here are few links to start with,
http://www.nikonians.org/nikon/nikkor-12-24mm/index.html
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/digital-wide-zooms/comparison.htm
Mind you, screw focus lenses (not AF-S) will not work on D40. Otherwise this one would be my #1 on the list,
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tokina/11-16mm.htm
So far I have been using Tokina 12-24/4 and I absolutely love it! Let me know if you want to see samples.
Good luck to you,
- Sergey
-
Try arctic butterfly from visible dust. This is a short review,
http://www.momentcorp.com/review/arcticbutterfly.html
I tried it and it works well.
- Sergey
-
I see! Mike and Peter thank you! Now as Peter displayed one of my images I see it is somehow resized, as my signature does not read clearly in the lower right corner. What is the best recommended size for images? Also for the gallery.
This brings another question (should not it be posted in other thread) - when resizing images, is not there like some 'good' ratio, as 25%, 50%, etc ... and not just random numbers? Anyone knows?
Thanks,
- Sergey
-
Few questions, first on the subject and others are added.
1) While responding to the post I tried to link images that I felt were relevant
to the discussion,
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00PTTK
The links however do not show as click-able, but as plain text instead. Is this
how it is meant to be? I would not mind if administrators could fix it for me
this time (if it is possible and/or necessary).
I am so far new here, so I do not have many images at photo.net yet.
2) Can images be directly displayed and not as links?
3) Can posts be re-edited after submitted? (I probably need to browse more to
see it myself).
5) What is the difference between post as html and post as plain text? Somehow
it seems text format works better for me this far.
Thanks,
- Sergey
-
As I remember 85/1.8 is almost half way less expensive than 85/1.4. If one stop is of value to you then it is much worth it in my opinion. I mean how often will you have to upgrade the lens?
Here are few street snaps with 85/1.8 on D200, all wide open,
http://i.pbase.com/o6/83/694283/1/93417054.TuKaDpL1.JUNEDSC_1414_2_FR_.jpg
http://i.pbase.com/o6/83/694283/1/94026205.36cwQPBt.PEOPLE2DSC_1429_3_FR_.jpg
http://i.pbase.com/o6/83/694283/1/94026204.rcdAEqEG.PEOPLE2DSC_1426_FR_3.jpg
http://i.pbase.com/o6/83/694283/1/79829034.0epXeUEW.2007.06.01DSC_1333_FR_.jpg
http://i.pbase.com/o6/83/694283/1/84748424.ApE5bvpI.PortraitsDSC_5844_FR_.jpg
http://i.pbase.com/o6/83/694283/1/93760808.i595MXJ7.COLORDSC_5847.jpg
http://i.pbase.com/o6/83/694283/1/94026201.SyxCVfsP.PEOPLE2DSC_1363_3.jpg
http://i.pbase.com/o6/83/694283/1/94026206.lCBpWeVP.PEOPLE2DSC_1431_FR_3.jpg
- Sergey
-
Thank you Bob and Josh,
- Sergey
-
I was trying to contact the administrators through the "contact us" form, and got
"Error
The message could not be sent. The error message was:
Expected a 250 status line; got: 550-Verification failed for"
I reduced the size of my message, still got the same error. Is this somehow
related to the current update?
Thanks,
- Sergey
-
Thank you Josh,
- Sergey
-
Hello,
As the title suggests, I would like to know what the space limit for the images
each subscriber gets. Also, if the image/s happens to be on some other server,
like pBase or such, can it be directly linked for photo-critique or does it need
to be uploaded to photo.net first?
Thanks all,
- Sergey
Image Size
in PhotoNet Site Help
Posted
Well, I sort of agree with you but full resolution would simply be an overkill for any gallery. Thanks Josh for responding by the way. I mean this is around 1000px high,
http://www.pbase.com/sngreen/image/95925150
Click next, and next, and next, and so on ... or here,
http://www.pbase.com/sngreen/image/94220347
I think one can judge the ability of camera/lens combination from these sizes here. I think.
Downsizing to almost half from the ones above would only add to the workflow and less detailed images at end. They do look fine from the thumbnails, as here,
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=833182
But the images I am afraid do not.
- Sergey