-
Posts
318 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by sngreen
-
-
I guess I have missed it, it is completely clean now. Any way to restore it?
-
<p>@Gerry Siegel,<br /> HG lenses will not bring you to the top of the line. They are good, but not where you imply they could be, and even more so on the quarter of a sensor. The SHG lenses are very good, you could almost call them the top, but those who bought them are few and far in between. So what is the point of continuing with yet another body that brings almost nothing commercially. Think about it.</p>
<p> </p>
-
-
It is a good lens for the price. It has a screw-driven focusing, so I am not sure if it will work on D70. It is considerably smaller than 70-200VR although it is also a full frame lens. On cropped sensor only the center is used, which in its turn delivers the best performance out of it. It is a perfect lens for street shots and quick portraits.
- sergey
-
It depends. Sigma (150, 105), Tamron (sp90) for macro, although I prefer Sigma. Tokina 12-24/4, 11-16/2.8) for wide angle. I never tried Vivitar. Would like to try out Zeiss though.
- sergey
-
Here in Vienna, Austria I think € 50 is pretty average price for sensor cleaning, but I do not think it is worth it. I did
D200 once myself and did not think it was difficult. Overall make sure you do not hold camera upwards so the sensor
would not catch more dust then you are removing from it. Make sure you have enough light in the room, the desk (or
where you do it) is reasonably clean and uncluttered, your battery is fully charged. Gently touch the surface of the
sensor (or rather filter that is on top of it) and move whatever on it from one side to the other (usually from left to right).
Or perhaps you do not need wet cleaning at all and arctic butterfly can do the job as well. So far I have seen only
wonders from it on my D300. Even when cleaning the focusing screen, which I thought usually was harder than
removing specs from the sensor.
- sergey
-
Thanks Joseph,
- sergey
-
<p><em>Sergey, How do you "open a ticket" with Nikon? </em><br />
<br />
Submit problem through their web, receive confirmation number via email. Someone
will usually contact within a day or so.<br />
<br />
I use NX because I think it gets me the best colors, but it gets very
frustrating when it starts acting. <br />
<br />
- sergey<br />
-
<p><em>Is there are reason to have 20 files open at once? I mean, you're only
editing one at a time anyway, right? Just use NX's browser window so you can SEE
all 20 files, and just drag the one you're playing with into the editing space.
20 RAW files is a lot of swap file manipulating on the part of the OS, lotsa RAM
or not. Just try changing that workflow a bit, and I'll bet all sorts of things
improve.</em><br />
<br />
I preview (by folders) in ViewNX, mark files I like, and then send them to
Capture. A bit repetitive but works well when in a hurry. This is a
very good advice you are giving. I must admit I never thought of using Capture's
own browser. Just tried it and I see marked files remain marked in Capture as well. Will do it next time I use
it.<br />
<br />
- sergey<br />
-
I am saving to the internal drive that has over 200G space left on a 3Gz 2core + 4G ram machine. I suspect it
also has something to do with Vista, since the hdrives never stop spinning, but it is just as annoying
nevertheless. I open 20 files at a time, save few till NX starts acting, close the application and start it
again. Very frustrating. I only wish Nikon opened up their secrets so Adobe and others could produce identical
results from the same files as well - I would never be bothered again.
Another problem that has never really been solved (at least for me) is "Could not safe file Access to file
denied" dialogs. Seems the only way to get around it is to keep the directory open and delete *.tmp file whenever
the image file becomes "unsavable". Kind of kludgy way of working with modern software methinks.
Anyways, just felt like venting out. Good ideas but duh so many problems!
- sergey
-
Just opened another ticket with Nikon. When I try to save TIFF file in Capture NX2 the dialog box "Current task"
often says saving, but it is not going anywhere. Just sits in the middle of the screen with only option to
cancel. I wait, and wait, and wait ... nothing happens. Does anyone know of a good solution that would allow me
NOT to use NX2 EVER !?
- sergey
-
Few weeks ago I came across this article in Shutterbug
http://www.shutterbug.net/techniques/pro_techniques/0808howslow/index.html
- sergey
-
I do not own neither 10-20 nor 16.5 but if you get a good copy of 11-16/2.8 you will love it.
- sergey
-
I would return the lens if I were you immediately and buy a new one from the dealer where you can go back and
exchange it again if necessary. Once you know or think something is not right with your lens you will never be
happy with it. As for 11-16 the first sample I got was also a dud. See my quick comparison here
http://www.pbase.com/sngreen/tokina
Make sure you select the original size and then toggle between next and previous.
The 12-24 which I have used for over a year is flawless and the new replacement I got for 11-16 is excellent,
simply superb, but the first variant was not sharp through the entire range. The tech support from Tokina,
Netherlands confirmed the lens was not good and they simply replaced it. The funny part was when he told me over
the phone they are constantly restocking this lens since it is so popular. Wow! No kidding!
Not only the first and the second versions were different in sharpness but they also looked different. Strange as
it may sound but I think they had some kind of a different coating on them. When I held both 12-24 and the first
sample of 11-16 against the light I could clearly see 12-24 had a blue cast on the class whereas 11-16 was very
much Pentax like green. From any angle I looked. The second copy has a bit brownish tint to it but is very similar
to 12-24 otherwise.
I do not regret that I bought this lens; can not complain about the price, it is built well and delivers
excellent results. But the lesson learned is that it is always better to buy optics from the local dealer when I
can walk in the very next day and exchange it. Never buy from the internet unless there is a significant saving,
the dealer is known and you have bought from them before, or the lens can not be bought elsewhere. The hassle
is often not worth it.
Good luck to you and happy shooting,
- sergey
-
There are many ways to do it but the "canvas size" route is the easiest,
http://www.photos-of-the-year.com/articles/frame/
Repeat it several times, see what works what does not, and record the steps into one action. Use percentage
instead of the exact size when downsizing, so it works the same for all images.
- sergey
-
Thanks Ali,
- sergey
-
Check out Thom Hogan's page first<br />
<a href="http://www.bythom.com/cleaning.htm">Cleaning your Sensor</a><br />
<br />
This is if you need wet cleaning, which I do not think you do. Try Arctic
Butterfly instead<br />
<a href="http://www.momentcorp.com/review/arcticbutterfly.html">link 1</a> <br />
<a href="http://www.shuttertalk.com/articles/arcticbutterfly">link 2</a><br />
<a href="http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/accessories/arctic-butterfly.shtml">
link 3</a><br /><br />
I used it maybe 3 times in total on my D300 and I never see any spots on my
images, even at f22. <br /><br />
The speck that is seen through the viewfinder is most likely on your focusing screen
(above the mirror). Use arctic<br />
butterfly and it will be gone. Try to avoid blowing air into your camera, at
least at the beginning.<br />
<br />
- sergey<br />
-
<em>I'm guessing you haven't tried clicking on the image.</em><br />
<br />
I think it would not be a bad idea to show the images in a size the photographer
meant them to show and not in a size imposed by the site. But I also see how one size for all can help the site
to look and be universally clean. <br />
<br />
In most of the image browsers clicking on the image (or double-clicking) usually returns the viewer to the folder
(as one
level above) and not to the larger version of it. Perhaps a little
note "Click on the image to see it in a larger format" could be added as a hint, or cursor with
the magnifying glass when over the image. Something along these lines.<br />
<br />
- sergey</p>
-
<em>I think you can put html code in your biography section to include
specific photos on your portfolio page, I've seen it on some portfolios.</em><br />
<br />
Drop a link if you come across such a page. I would be interested to see it. Thanks.<br />
<br />
- sergey</p>
-
<em>Your own computer may be caching the page as well.</em><br />
<br />
I cleaned the cache as soon as I saw the old images, it did not help. That is why I asked. Some months
ago I was also under an impression the images rotated in some sort of a random order.
Now I see they do not and I think it would be good if they did. Or even better
if the user could select the images to show in the profile.<br />
<br />
I just clicked on my name and I see the images are different now. So it looks
like it took a while (at least in hours) for the old ones to go.<br />
<br />
- sergey
-
Thanks Rainer,
- sergey
-
I deleted few images from my portfolio but they still show up here
http://www.photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2219310
Do the images in fact remain?
Also, is it possible to select specific images (to show) when someone is looking into my profile?
Thanks,
- sergey
-
Yes 85/1.8 is an outstanding lens but I would not be saying Sigma is a slouch either. It is really hard to give an advice when comparing those two. If you already have one I would add 85 as well, but not at the expense of the other.
- sergey
-
I would keep sigma if I were you. Nikon is a very fine lens but it does not allow as close focusing as Sigma does, and 105 (also 150) is not a bad lens at all. I do not always shoot macros but I will never let my 150 go, although I have the range covered with 70-200vr as well. I would add 85/1.8, but I would not be swapping for it.
- sergey
My galleries are gone ..
in PhotoNet Site Help
Posted
That is the mirracle! Thank you kindly. I better bookmark it now.
ty