tony_lockerbie

<p>OK, one from me...but I'm not the worlds best bird photographer.</p><div></div>

<p>Really big thanks to you all...such a helpful forum! I'm only marginally tech savvy, so I will get my tech guru(aka my son) to read your replies when he gets back.<br> Most of the things you have suggested I have tried, including a new cable, different ports, installing new drivers etc. I think that Robert is going to try his laptop to see if the issue lies with my laptop or not.<br> I will keep you posted!<br> PS, I have windows 10, and use Epson scan.</p>

<p>Never used these Andy, but Leica rebadged Minolta zooms for use on the earlier R series cameras...some some praise there!</p>

<p>Hi folks. I realize that this is not a classic camera in any way, but I have on going problems with my scanner...or computer. I keep getting the message that the scanner can't be detected, and I'm pretty sure that the scanner itself is ok. I have changed the cable, tried different input posts, and downloaded the drivers again. Sometimes it all comes back, but not often...very frustrating.<br> Anyone out there with the same, or similar scanner had this problem?</p>

<p>Wouldn't think so Tom, although I'm not familiar with the G2. Quite possible that these functions are working ok, and the problem is with the LCD itself.<br> I would just try it and see what happens! Someone here may be able to add more light than I can. Quality camera though, with superb lenses...hope it works out.</p>

<p>Lovely Brad. You certainly have a classic combination there...congrats!<br> Your pics have a lovely warmth to them, with nice open shadows, which is a real advantage with these older lenses. You can "up" the contrast quite easily in the darkroom or with your post processing of choice.<br> Like Mukul says, it's really hard to find these early Leitz lenses that are not scratched or very hazy...I'm officially jealous!<br> Also great to see that you are processing your own, and as Rick says, it soon becomes second nature. Also good to get those mistakes out of the way early! Your mark on the film looks like a water drying mark. After treating in dilute photo flow (don't make it too strong) I wipe the film both sides with a Wettex brand sponge...speeds up drying and eliminates any water marks....make sure it's clean though!</p>

<p>I must confess that I have never handled a Balda camera, let alone used one! My, it is pretty...lovely design, and thanks for showing it in your usual impeccable photos.<br> That old racecourse pavilion looks the business, and I can see how you could absorbed in that project...the thing is a symphony in timber. Seems like the light is getting better and better down there.<br> When was that pavilion built? Looks early 20's?</p>

<p>Personally I would go for the Trinar too as it's a proven good performer. A lot of the Novar lenses were actually re badged Trinars and proved that great results can be had from just three elements...albeit at middling apertures.<br> I haven't had too much to do with the Cassar, but it should be ok but I think that the Rodenstock lens will give more contrast, plus it does have that Compur shutter.<br> Good luck with your endeavors!</p>

<p>Yes, the Jet-O-Matic, got to have one of those! Thanks again Marc.</p>

<p>Funny, but I always have leftovers :)</p>

<p>I think that it was Gene M who mentioned the "vodka affected quality control" Anyway, the reliability, or lack of, from many Soviet era manufacturers is legendary.<br> Part of the charm of collecting FSU cameras is the lottery surrounding their ability to function properly. We classic camera users love a challenge!<br> I can see your frustration though, as the Narciss cameras can cost a fair bit more than an old Zenit for example, which sells for the price of a bag of popcorn....so yes, your buy, try and dump strategy is flawed here.<br> Good luck with your repairs, and I hope you will share some pics of, and with, a working Narciss. </p>

<p>Mike, love the ghost ship, and Bill, that Auto Union is really something. Michael, your Yashica is scary sharp! I too am having scanner issues, might just be the cable, see if I can sort it this weekend.<br> Maybe I can do a late post.</p>

<p>All those ads make you come over all weak kneed. Nice to see an ad for the Vitessa, and how I wish I could still get that original Adox film!<br> The Canon article is also a top read...thanks again!</p>

<p>Nice Marc, love the article on Imogen Cunningham...and that big aerial camera...wow!</p>

<p>I don't know the Buster Brown....love to see a pic of it, and some pics taken with it.</p>

<p>You are right about the camera being a brick, so solid and well made, and a lot of pros back in the day preferred to use the Nikkormat over the F. There was certainly no drop in build quality, you can hammer in nails with these cameras!<br> The 50mm F2 is also a classic, doesn't seem to matter which version you use, they all are a class act. Nice to see that you have a good working outfit that is already taking some nice pics. If you have just started developing film then you deserve a pat on the back!<br> I love that street scene, where do you live? Looks to be a really nice place.</p>

<p>Well presented Katie! Always enjoy a comparison, and it's great to see the Calypso close and personal. They are a rare beast indeed, and you are very fortunate to acquire one for such a great price.<br> I have never seen one in the flesh, but have owned all the Nikonos models up to the 1VA from one time or another. Currently have a model 111, and I can report that the viewfinder is quite clear on mine, unlike the model 1 and 11 that I had previously.<br> The 35mm standard lens is direct from the older Nikon RF cameras, and is quite a good lens. I also have the 28mm UW lens that works much better underwater due to being fully corrected for that application. Of course it can't be used out of the water like the 35.<br> Look forward to some more classic camera test from you in the future!</p>

<p>Great to see. These Kodaks from this period are quite pretty things, and yours looks mint. I have the similar but smaller Starmite which uses even more annoying 127 film....so it rarely gets used.<br> Even with the somewhat compromised optics, your feeling for light and composition still come through nicely...great stuff!</p>

<p>Last one.</p><div></div>

<p>Next...</p><div></div>

<p>Nice work all,and the Clack is turning in some great images. JDM, you must have had an interesting job...envy!<br> I took out an old pre-war Rolleiflex with the un- coated Tessar...love an old Rollei!</p><div></div>

<p>Good solid SLR, and will take good pictures....have fun!</p>

<p>Thanks Marc...great reading as usual...love those ads!</p>

<p>Aah, those bags...you see so many of them, and they are usually full of junk, but you have done well! I was never a fan of the Reomar, but your pics look very crisp, so there you go! The Nagel Kodaks are all really nicely made, and very pretty too. Did you use that Kodak exposure calculator :)</p>

<p>Nice catch Elena. The little Racer is one of the prettiest rangefinders around....have fun!</p>