Jump to content

kevin cassar

Members
  • Posts

    308
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by kevin cassar

  1. Well there's probably about five to six thousand of them. The thing is I used to post frequently until all of a sudden no one seemed to look at my photos and no comments were received, and so I kinda stopped posting. Also since I am not subscribed I can only post one a day. I will try to fill in the gaps soon. Thanks for viewing and comment.
  2. Well If you can't lie face down, try sitting on the sand and get as low as you can. I know the D200 cost us a lot of money but part of that price was the robust body and sealing which you can rely on (I accidentally dropped mine about 6 feet off a wall with the 18-200 VR and SB-600 flash attached and the result was a few scratches on my sb600 which is plastic) Oh and finally I'd like to see more shots with your 70-200 which is haunting my sleep, and threatening my bank balance.
  3. Ok I shall start by saying that I am in no way an expert photographer or a professional one, but since we have some things in common - the D200 and love of kids, I shall give you my couple of hints. Ok first hint is when taking shots of kids go down to their level (even if this means lying down). The impact of the shot will be much more pleasant and will be like seeing the world through their perspective. For example my last post "S is for Slowly Snail" was taken with me lying face down on the sand. Finally unless their is something interesting that will add value to your photo you should frame tightly and unless it's a candid shot wait until distracting things leave your frame.

    Hanna and Mom

          9
    Beautiful....I have taken a look at some of your photos of your aborable little angel and checked out the lens you were using. I think (guess) this was taken after the ones where the girl is on her own because it seem like you have stopped down on this one getting the subject sharper than the others (which i guess were taken wide open). I have not used a normal lens so far but from what I've read, wide open gives you a limited dof thus making it essential to get the focus spot on. Like most other lenses it's sharpest when it's down a stop or two. Best wishes for happiness with your lovely child and thanks for your comment on my photo.

    Rebecca

          4
    In my opinion, (photo details would help) this is not a focus error but possibly camera shake. Either you had too slow a shutter speed or went too close to the subject beyond the minimum focus distance.

    dune grass

          11
    All you need with insects is time and patience. IMHO a 500mm lens is too big to get a clear shot without a tripod unless you have a huge amount of light which does not seem to be the case. I have captured dragons with my cheap but useful Sigma 70-300 Apo macro lens handheld at 300mm on my D200. I have both perched and in flight shots in my gallery. Have a look http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4973736&size=lg if you have time.

    Speed

          6
    First of all I thank you for viewing my photo and leaving a comment. I often get some good ratings and a few 3/3s but no comments (good or bad). I must admit I took like a dozen shots to get about 4 sharp ones. The deatils for the shot are: 1/2000s F 8 and unfortunately ISO 800. I'm trying to save for an F2.8 sport lens which would have produced a higher quality photo (lower ISO) and a much faster autofocus.
  4. Brilliant idea!! I know it's much easier to critique an idea than come up with one, but I'd have shot the falls with a slow shutter and then shot another with the model in order to have the girl perfectly sharp. Having said that she did a great job to stand as still as possible and you to capture the image.

    Untitled

          2
    My goodness..... this photo is perfect in my book. Light - brilliant, model - beautiful, composition - interesting, and the reflection is the cherry on the cake. This is definitely 7/7.

    Abbey

          5
    This is a great shot of a very cute little girl. On seeing the top part of the background though, I imagine it would have been spectacular had you managed to shoot from a slightly lower angle so as to fill the background with the top part which contrasts much better than the white in the middle!
×
×
  • Create New...