Jump to content

robiek

PhotoNet Pro
  • Posts

    471
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by robiek

  1. Enjoy. The original framed (40x50cm) work is displayed at my home gallery and there's a collegue who has been trying to pry this photograph off the wall..."Keep bidding"; I say... (just to encourage him in to do something Ansel Adams with his outdoor large format photography of the wonders of nature, so I can trade for his work...)

    Untitled

          1
    ...my comment on the other two shots of this series. The out of focus navel somehow distracts me in this photograph. And please feel free to comment my gallery, or selection thereof....

    Untitled

          2

    I like this better than the other photograph showing the navel. Yet to emphasize the elegance of this beautiful picture I took the liberty of making it into the calligraphy on white paper discussed before. Please enjoy the attached test file inverted from your original.

    2132134.jpg
  2. You are correct in that this would work as a more closely cropped picture. However I decided upon this (original framed print also) as the model is physically long and I wanted to put a bit of dark at the top and bottom of the photograph.
  3. Sadly the hand to the left got cropped at the point of taking the picture. But I decided on keeping both back arches as focus is on the strange tattoo and the glint of jewelry. Thank you for finding it cool...
  4. Thanks, you certainly see the same as I. The disorderly shape and array of the tiles plus the perfect (Mandelbrot set) shape of the tattoo. Please read the James Gleick book "Chaos: Making a new science"...it's math, physics and the geometry of nature in an interesting package.
  5. Thank you Owl Ink for your supporting input. I'm an avid reader of any constructive comment and ideas...I'm a constant learner like all of us. The original print has (a 1kW) lightsource to the left and I thought it'd be natural to let it show due to the pose and closed eyes. And to Michael; yes, all natural....
  6. Some of the models I photograph own pets and thus I have tried to

    take some pictures of both. This is one of my personal favourites.

    It has a companion picture showing the model turned the other way

    without the cat and using the studded collar as a bracelet.

  7. Personally I like the dark in the picture but you are correct in the redirection of light. I thought somewhat about this context when naming the photograph...but decided upon using "Call" as the model got an obviously awaited and enjoyed ring on her cellphone.
  8. The vertical scratches are due to a malfunction in the process of developing the film. Instead of discarding it I made "nail scratches" extending from the prominent natural nails of this female model. The androgynity of the pose has been a basis for several conversations in front of the original framed 0,6 x 0,9 meter tack sharp print. It was also a poster for one of my exhibitions called "Nails & Scratches".
  9. Thanks...the model was very confident. Eventually I'll replace the pic with a better scan. Doing nothing but b&w work I pondered, upon releasing the shutter, that the natural red hair is in nice color balance with the red tile wall outside....undiscernible in monochrome (but I wont convert).
  10. OK, I read inspiring comments...To Doug and your neighbour I can reveal that the traffic on the street below started stopping after awhile of photographing (and no, the model did not throw her hat at the audience)...And to Thomas, yep, the sun took care of the rating...nothing shows on the 6x7 negative.
  11. Thanks for you comment...I actually placed (on purpose) the diptyk the other way than the actual framed work is. Included here is the original setup of the dual pictures. For me the two pictures work best when the model couple have their backs together. Perhaps more about movement than symmetry or rythm...

    2118954.jpg
×
×
  • Create New...