cghubbell
-
Posts
793 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Image Comments posted by cghubbell
-
-
Thanks for the correction - I've updated the description accordingly.
-
Thanks for the naming correction. I hadn't realized how close the two were, but now I see my error. I've updated the names - thanks!
-
I've been courting this shot for a long time, but a branch was always
in the wrong place. Things finally came together for a fairly clean
shot. Would have loved a bit of magic hour glow, but I'm pleased this
guy was willing to give me this opportunity. Your thoughts and
criticism are appreciated.
-
Struglling to get more verticals... I'm boggled at how often I think
the camera is straight but is really on a 45 degree angle! Well, not
that bad really... This was one that came out decent. A bit small in
the frame, but I like the "in context" effect since birds love the
thick cover a burning bush provides. Thoughts and criticism are welcome.
-
My only self-criticism is that I'd have liked a bit more depth of
field to keet the backgroud duck sharp. I was focused on the
Mallard's head, but just didn't think. Despite the shortcoming, I'm
very pleased with the composition; I dig symmetry in Nature. As
always, I welcome your thoughts and criticism.
-
I've been working on cleanrer backgrounds, but I felt this one
complimented the bird. Too busy? Ok? I'd appreciate your thoughts.
-
The peanut butter is a great idea, but I don't think I can get any closer. I shot this from about 6' so they'd have to be tame to do better. I use (surprise!) peanut butter suet cakes to lure in this one, and an elusive red-bellied woodpecker that I haven't been able to get a good shot of yet.
-
Thanks! I didn't even notice that bud. Tough to shoot in a burning bush without something getting too close to the depth of field. I agree completely and will definitely clone it out when I make the print master.
-
-
I've been stalking the purple finch for a while now, but this is the
first time I've had decent lighting and a clear shot. They usually
tuck themselves deep into the burning bushes or evergreens where it's
too think to see them. I had about two seconds in this position
before he flew off, and fortunately, my auto-focus didn't hunt this
time. I think he felt sorry for me and gave a gift. As always, I
appreciate thoughts and critiques.
-
Another I was really pleased with from yesterday's songbird work. A
sliver of over-exposure on the fringes, but I still like the effect.
Your thoughts and critiques are appreciated.
-
It would be truly amazing if that wing were sharp... But I have to say that it wasn't until I closed my jaw and blinked a few times that I was able to think about technicalities. This image immediately drew me into the scene and almost had a few frames of motion built in to the feel. Amazing work - I would be very proud to have this in my portfolio.
-
I have edited the displayed image to take into account Jerry's suggestion of cloning out a distracting foreground branch from the lower right. Image is otherwise the same.
-
Just wanted to make a note that I've updated the image being diaplayed. It is now cropped where the original was not.
-
I'm disappointed that the tail was cropped, but it didn't seem to
detract much from the image in my eyes. More of the perfectionist in
me dreaming of being Art Morris in a second life! Do you agree, or is
it a problem?
Thoughts and criticism are welcome!
-
I'm really pleased with the detail in this image. These guys are very
skittish, and this is by far the best portrait I've been able to
create of a Downy. I welcome your thoughts and criticism...
-
Nice clean background. Seems like something could be done to simplify the composition more. There is so much of the planter in the scene that I bounce back and forth between it, the plant, and the bird. Perhaps a sharper angle that would bring the bird closer to the plant, and then expose more of the background?
-
This was my favorite from a series that was assembled into a
presentation. The presentations don't have much of an outlet here, so
I wanted to pull this one out for some feedback. Thoughts and
criticism are appreciated.
-
I was messing aroud with learning how this lens behaves with
diffraction effects and ended up really liking the way this image
balanced. Thoughts and ciriticisms always appreciated.
-
The trees on top of this hill seemed to stand alone on the coast
against the ocean. I wanted to capture the ocean's vastness and its
effect of drarfing the trees. A small wave crashing in was the icing
on the cake. If I could do it over I think I'd be at this spot when
the light was less harsh, but otherwise I'm pleased with the
composition. As always, your thoughts and ciriticisms are appreciated.
-
I haven't yet identified this little guy but he was an amazing model
and held perfectly still for many poses. Found him sunning on the
coast while I was shooting the ocean. I was thinking about cropping
tighter, but I like the way he balances with the rocks vs. being a
blatent subject. After all, blending in is his innate talent. I'm
interested to know what others think, so please take a moment to comment.
If any reptile experts are viewing and know who I've captured, I would
welcome the information.
-
Sounds like some cropping may help. I had been thinking that the parallel branches added interest, but perhaps it's just a distraction. Thanks for your comment!
-
We had a dumping of wet snow which made for a nice blanketing on the
bushes. Caught this shot in the morning before it had a chance to
melt and get messy. Thoughts and criticism are appreciated.
-
Another image from yesterday's session with the waxwings. It was
amazing that the first time I get to photograph these birds I end up
with a tree full of them. Your thoughts and criticisms are appreciated.
American Goldfinch (Carduelis tristis)
in Nature
Posted
I'm very pleased with this one. For some reason my goldfinch images
often come out with this watercolor feel to them... Don't know what
it is, but I enjoy it. Your thoughts and criticism are appreciated!