Prof-K

Thanks John, Chuk. So it has the same meaning as in the rigid summicron (although the number is not under the infinity catch on the summicron). Not sure how I forgot about that.

 

Any help on the hood will be appreciated.

 

Cheers,

Shakil

Hello,

 

I just bought a <b>type-3</b> Summicron 35mm/2 lens (so far my costliest lens).

Can you tell me if the square hood for the 4th-version 35'cron will work with

this lens?

Can I use it on top of a 39mm screw-on filter? (I already know about the

original hood for the 3rd version).

<br><br>

Also, another question about old LTM lenses: can anyone tell me what the number

on the back of the infinity catch/lock means (e.g. on the Summar)?

<br><br>

Searched the forum w/no luck. Thanks in advance.

<br>

Shakil

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/6205887-lg.jpg"></img>

AFAIK, a Standard has a standard screw mount, a Leica 1 has a non-standard mount, so can't use LTM lenses.

<center><a href="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/6198011-lg.jpg"><img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/6198011-md.jpg"></img></a></center>

Luis, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=104227585&context=set-72057594070107293&size=o">Here you go</a>.

<br>

Check out <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/summicron/sets/72057594070107293/">this flickr folder</a> for more

Discontinued, however generally means an increase in price, specially of the black version. I think the price is still the same at CameraQuest, but its gonna go up (just like all other discontinued black VC lenses)...so get yours while its cheap (if you need/want it).

Thanks Scott, Larry, and Ron! Much appreciated.

Hi guys,

 

I just bought two Watson bulk film loaders, one with some TX leftover inside. Is

there any quick way to check whether it has been exposed to light (other than

taking some shots and developing it fully)?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Cheers,

Shakil

<center>

<a href="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/6107217-lg.jpg"><img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/6107217-md.jpg"></img>

</a><br>Same as above

<br>

<a href="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/6102501-lg.jpg"><img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/6102501-md.jpg"></img></a>

<br>Hexar RF,CV 15,TX,Microphen

</center>

<center>

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/6107221-lg.jpg"></img>

<br>Hexar RF,Summar,APX100,Rodinal</center>

Travis, nice show man!

ugh...I guess I mean: there are plenty of room for error tolerance...

Good question Alex; I'd also like to know.

 

Good luck. Developing film is very easy. There are a lot of room for errors, and its hard to mess up, since you can do the whole process with lights on. I'm going to try to print for the first time; I have 95% of the equipments required, but I'm also really terrified to start :)

<center><img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/6069431-lg.jpg"></img></center>

Cheers, Keith.

<center>

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/6069402-lg.jpg"></img><br>

Fujifilm F10

</center>

Thanks Alex. These are 1 hr mini-lab Noritsu scans with no editing (except resizing) on my part. Cheers!

just portraits...

<center>

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/6068724-lg.jpg"></img><br>

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/6068723-lg.jpg"></img><br>

Hexar RF/1935 Summar 50/2+SOOMP/Provia 100/Hoya Digital UV filter(!)

</center><br>

More <a href="http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=680253">here</a>

Frederic, some very nice shots in your gallery!

<center>

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/6046070-lg.jpg"></img><br>

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/6046069-lg.jpg"></img><br>

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/6046062-lg.jpg"></img><br>

Fujifilm F10

</center>

Nice! Thanks for the link, Tony.

<center><img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/6016623-lg.jpg"></img><br>

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/6016624-lg.jpg"></img>

</center>

<center><img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/5982721-lg.jpg"></img><br>Fujifilm F10<br></center>

Nice shot, Clive!