peter_kim2
-
Posts
371 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by peter_kim2
-
-
I think Ikon and Nikon are a coincidence. Isnt Nikon short for Japanese? Something like Nippon Kogaku....
-
Ive seen many references to this film but never here in the US. I
guess its either an export product or a renamed US film for other
markets.
Anyone know what this film is?
-
HI Jati if you are talking about the Childrens Museum around the corner from Union station on i steet, its gone! They tore it down to make way for new development around the new subway. Good riddince I say that was the sacariest looking childrens museum I ever saw!
-
Hey Jim and Al wow this is a really great thread. What I posted was by no means information found out totally on my own. Just personal observations supported by more learned members than I on photo.net
To address Jim, Yeah I agree increaseing development time generally increases contrast. But I think that reducing the solvent action of the devloper by diluting reduces contrast more than extending devlopment time increases it. But now that you mention it I also wonder if this is as much an action of the extended development time as it is the natural tendancy for increased contrast when underexposing and overdeveloping in general.
Al I find your bottom line very interesting as it seems to run opposite to what I always 'naturally' accepted as dogma. That being that diluting the developer is better for pushing...Now I AM confused! :)
-
Diluting a developer like D-76 or Xtol as opposed to using it striaght reduces contrast and enhances sharpness at the expense of slightly more grain.
As to the topic of pushing, but you may find results when pushing at 1:1 better than with undiluted developer as pushing film (deliberatly underexposing and overdeveloping) naturally increases contrast. But the sharpness gained is, in my opinion, a good trade off for a little bit of grain when pushing anyway.
-
Without getting specific I would think all the regualar stuff that would apply to other Ms wouldnt it? I think Steve Gandy has a long list of reccomended things to check on his site cameraquest.com it makes for good reading!
-
EOS 3 is kinda heafy in terms of price. I think you should look at the rebel as well as the new Elan 7n. They have all the features of the A1 and more.
Or a used Elan 7e. (disclaimer: I am currently selling one here) :)
-
Anyone know how this effect was acheived?
http://www.raysoda.com/Com/Photo/View.aspx?f=A&pg=1&p=167098
It looks like somekinda starburst flash.
-
I found this info on a Korean Leica site from someone who was at
photokina.
Top shutter speed is 1/2000 and IS a film camera and it says it
comes with a 'standard mount that can be used with many
rangefinders' which to me is saying it is an M mount leica.
Measuring basis .75mm and is 30 percent brighter than the M7.
Also come with these new lenses:
50mm F2 Planar ZM,
35mm F2 Biogon ZM,
28mm F2.8 Biogon ZM
25mm F2.8 Biogon ZM
21mm F2.8 Biogon ZM
15mm F2.8 Distagon ZM
85mm F2 Sonnar ZM
Heres the new press release:
http://www.zeiss.de/C1256A770030BCE0/WebViewTopNewsAllE/1A30F92F41D05
AB4C1256F1C002E544A?OpenDocument
-
I think you can give Al the benefit of the doubt. Oriental is and has been considered an offensive term for many many years. Al, if you know any 'asian' people I suggest you ask them or call them Oriental as opposed to Asian and see how they react, then you will see why Andrew is making such a fuss..
No its not as offensive as the 'n' word but its kinda akin to calling a black person a 'negro' which was an accetable term a long time ago but not now...
Anyways back to the topic at hand...I also would reccoemnd a T3, shutter lag is not that bad especailly if you prefocus and the lens quality is very excellent indeed. Although they have a couple known issuses, sometimes the lens sticks half way open while retracting. Just tap it or turn the dail to get it to retract all the way. Also the tooth that catchs the film sprokets have been known to wear down.
-
Im gonna miss scott...and Dave, he does know what he is talking about although sometimes he sounds like a jerk his helpfull advice over the years has more than made up for it I think.
-
I beleive its 35 not 25...ie (25, 50, 75,90) vs. (40, 50, 75, 90)
A 1.0 viewfinder is 1:1 perspective and produces what people call the floating frame cause it frames the same as you see.
My only question is, is there really that much difference between the 40 and 50mm perspective to jusitify it being on the same camera?
-
Jon the 724B is an excellent tripod I got one last year. I can use it at eye level without even extending all the way up and I'm 6 feet tall. ITs very stable and pretty lightwieght. And the ballhead is nice and big. Ive used heavy medium format gear on it with no problems. I highly reccomend that you test one out.
-
Now this is wierd. I have a Minolta Hi-matic F. Its a fully
automatic 70's era range finder with ASA settings from 25 to an
oddball 500.
So anyways I am using 1.4 volt zinc-air hearing aid batteries and
did an exposure test to see how it would work out. Sensia 100 with
consecutive shots set at the following:
160, 125, 100, 80, 60, 50, 40, 30.
This is the weird part. The first 3 exposures (at 160, 125 and 100)
were virtually identical. I cant tell any difference. And the
exposure 'seemed' perfectly on, but none of the shots were
overexposed so I coulnt compare.
The next 3 (80, 60, 50) are also almost identical but ever so
slightly darker than the first set of three.,
Heres the wierd part the last 2 at 40 and 30 are really, really
dark, definitly underexposed with almost no detail.
Now, if I down rate the ASA from the film's rated 100 to 40 or 30
(effectivily puposely overexposing the film) Shouldnt the ones at 40
and 30 be bright and blown out instead of dark? This is really
wired...I even tore out the slide holders to make sure the lab didnt
mess up the order of the frames but they didnt...
Any ideas on this wierd situation? Maybe my first mistake was using
a film with such a wide exposure latitude...But this is normally the
only slide film I shoot when I do shoot slides.
-
Yoel why dont you just borrow a Leica for a few days? If you dont know anyone then I'm sure there are photo stores renting them if you live anywhere near a moderaty large city.
-
Hi everyone thanks for the feedback. Its nice to know if I eventualy decide to get one I can get batteries for it.
George I am interested but I dont think I have quite enough money saved up to meet the kind of price I think you would want. But just in case let me know!
-
If you're talking about the negative's physical qualities then you can easily replicate them. After developing dip them in photo flo to resist water spots and hang them to dry overnight in a dust free area. Most self repecting photlabs make at least the effort to be dust free. As to the film being flat, theyve had 10 years to flatten out!
If you want flat negs I suggest you sleve them in pages and place a heavy book or other flat object on top of it for a couple days and they should be flat as a board.
Never send out BW negs out to be processed. You dont know what devloper they use and you cant control the characterisitcs of the film. Its more often miss than hit.
-
Hope this is the appropriate forum, I figured Leica people would
know more about this camera that the Minotla thread people. I had a
couple questions about the Minolta CLE which I am very interested in
seeing if I can find used since I cant yet afford to buy a M6 which
I really would like.
Firstly can it use a commonly available battery? I hope its not
mercury. I read on Steve Gandy;s site that it uses a D76 battery.
Never heard of this one. The only D76 I know is the devloper!
Secondly how is the shutter sound? Is it much louder than a
comparable Leica? Im sure it must be much quieter than my Canon A-1
maybe its quieter than my EOS Elan 7?
Lastly, how much is the going price nowadays for the body or the
body with the 40mm rokkor? Assuming I can find one that is!
Thank you!
-
I dont understand why they would use a camera made in the 50s for a movie set in the 30s and 40s. Personally I think a nice Leica M2 or 3 would look much more classy and 'retro' to fit the look of the film.
-
If you know the pros and cons theres no reason to ask us. Taylor it to what you shoot.
-
Hey Berk let me know if you ever want to part with a pair! :)
-
OH heres that chart I was talking about. The discharge is similar but the zinc are discharge slightly faster and at an angle. Not exactly constant.
-
Hey J. I heard that they have a faster and uneven discharge slope. I rememebr seeing a chart somewhere before but I dont know where now. In any case I only use BW films like Tri-x with my camera (a minolta himatic) so variable dischrage doesnt seem to be a big deal for me. Slide film is another matter all together!
Gerald, Know any place specific we can get Mercury batteries? I tried a google seach but was unable to find anything except abotu replacement batteries not the real deal.
-
Hi John, Tito and everyone...Thanks for the info. It seems like a really nice looking and intriguing little camera.
Does anyone know how the shutter is? I guess it should be pretty quiet since its a rangefinder. How does the sound of it compare to say a leica? I know it cant be quieter but maybe very silent none the less?
NO purple negatives here!
in Black & White Practice
Posted