Jump to content

enrico__

Members
  • Posts

    247
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by enrico__

  1. I have always used MamiyaRB/RZ67 gear. I wish to purchase a

    Hasselblad. Im looking at some secondhand gear and its all black,

    silver, cm,c,cx,elm etc etc... I know the silver lenses are the

    earlier, but thats about it. Can anyone direct me to a website that

    outlines the history of the Hasselblad 6x6 MF line up/? Or anyone

    care to give me a brief headstart. I will probably be purchasing used

    cameras. What do you own/use, and why?

  2. Ok this is what Ive done..:

     

    I have a 90mm Angulon and the sutter died (dead, zip, gone,

    finito..).

     

    I needed a replacement shutter.

     

    The front and rear glass of the 90mm Angulon fit exact into a

    (chrome) series shutter from an 80mm Mamiya TLR lens. The focus is

    perfect, Flash sync works, however Im concerned about how the

    aperture has/is translated.

     

    Maybe Im just confusing myself but Im wondering if there is any

    translation between an 80mm lens designed for Medium Format, and a

    90mm Lens designed for a Large/r Format when aperture/shutter is

    interchanged between the two?

     

    I thought the best way to find out would be to make a negative and

    judge the exposure. However, I think the thing that confused me is

    that I took a light reading and set the aperture/shutter according to

    the reading and the exposure was fine. So Is the focal length,

    regardless of lens coverage, the same as far as adption of a

    different shutter/aperture goes? (Now I'll ask in a different

    way..).. If I screw 90mm Angulon elements in a shutter designed for a

    medium format 80mm lens then should, and How, would the aperture

    translate?

  3. Yeah I know what you mean Bruno, Its a strange act to follow - that initial liberty experienced with a camera. And still its not yet realised until sometime after the images are taken.

     

    This is an interesting topic. Say, the first time I had wanted (or allowed myself to lose myself, and nearly lose my head) with a camera, was when I had travelled to europe and bummed around. Like you said, many churches etc so it was a case of diverted observation so as not to keep it true to waht I was aiming for. Anyway, those negs/proofs sat in a box for 5 years before I decided it was time to make a body of prints. That body of work had a very positive reception and was in effect my first solo show - but, the reaction from viewers was 'it differs from your current/recent work'. That got me thinking... why? (I understand there could be a number of answers for that 'why' but I think it was mainly to do with not having to think about anything apart from the image itself [pre-exposed]).ie: the want for an image at the time, as opposed to the wishing for a 'wow' photograph later on.

  4. Hi Steven,

    Yes, and Yes.

     

    First thing - check to see if the lever arm on your lens isnt bent etc.

     

    If you are dead set positive that problem isnt the lens (and it probably isnt) then looks like your gearing is probably of by a cog or two.

     

    Behind the front plate (ie, the plate that the taking lens sits on) is a part that acts as a pendulum. Your cocking lever (on the body) is part of, or connected to this part. So as the 'pendulum' swings side to side it in effect causes your lever to move up and down. (So to make sense of this, all things being circular, your cocking lever is just a 'pendulum' on its side...).

     

    Now, the bottom of this 'pendulum' has gear type 'teeth'. This gear is probably misaligned. Mine was misaligned by one cog. yep, pain in the ass.

     

    If you move it over one way by too many cogs then it will lower the lever too much. If you move it over by too many cogs the other way then it wont reach its target point. Its just trial and error. You'll work it out. The front plate can be removed quite easily (screws).

     

    Make sure you have patience and a good memory, and take your time. These cameras are renowned for having left over "shit, where did these come from?" type of parts...

  5. Hi all,

     

    I have aquired 3 packs (50sh) of Kodak Kodalith Film in 4x5. There

    are quite a few sheets there and I hope to experiment with it all.

     

    Has anyone had much experience with this film? I plan to use it in

    camera.

     

    What do I process this film in? Dektol? What dilution should I be

    looking at as a starting point? I understand I can achieve a high

    contrast effect as well as a somewhat pictorial result yet with still

    graphic qualities.. but how?

     

    Thankyou -~Enrico.

  6. William, Jay, John, Thanks all for your responses.

     

    William, I routinely rate my Tri-x anywhere between 200 and 320 - depending on the situation, ball park is ISO 250.

     

    I never use Ilford delta 100. I was given 5 rolls and didnt know what to do with it so I made a test roll and put it through the developer. I do not like t/grain type emulsions but admittedly this roll turned out beautiful at ISO 50.

     

    I figured I may need a slight time increase in Bath A and perhaps an adjustment of ISO (slight). I will expose a roll and do some clip tests.

     

    Jay, Im not using a specific recipe. Im experimenting with varying amounts of raw chemical. I have used diafine and only use it for one specific situation (night/tri-x). I have been looking at beutler's, adam's, and thornton's recipes, amongst others. I have not added metol to the batch yet though.

     

    It makes sense now that the contrast is controlled by bath A.

     

    John, Thankyou for taking the time to post the explanation concerning Divided Dev's and Two Bath methods. Much appreciated. Im sure it will be useful to many others as well.

  7. Regarding Two Bath film development and density:

     

    To increase overall density, would you give the film more exposure

    (lower ISO)?,

     

    Or, Increase time in the A bath?, Or, Increase time in the B bath?

    (considering that the metering is correct).

     

    Im looking at some negs that I processed (3 different film types-

    400TX, Delta100, J&C/P100) and my Bath B is a metaborate solution.

    Overall the negs look a little thin, but more like they are

    underdeveloped.

  8. Bob,

     

    The mirror will stay up indefinately. Its not as if the mirror resets it self, you have to re-set it. When you press the button, the mirror flips up first and the the shutter in the lens fires.

     

    ""Will it stay up for 1 second, if you set that speed on the lens and switch the body to RBL?""

     

    >>- it will stay up for as long as you want it to stay up... every time you re-set the shutter, you re-set the mirror.

  9. Also, Bob mentioned "What I'm not sure about is whether the camera will fire in RBL mode without a battery - I haven't tried this. If it will, then you can get the full range of shutter speeds with an RB lens on an RZ."

     

    Well, you can get the full range of shutter speeds with an RB lens on an RZ body, no problem. BUT this is with the battery installed. Many people dont realise that the battery does not only control the shutter, it also controls the mirror release.

     

    If you have an RB lens, RZ body, set the dial to RBL and have NO battery then it still wont fire.

     

    If you have an RB lens, RZ body, set the dial to RBL, and have a battery installed, the all will be ok.

     

    If you have no battery then you will have to follow the procedure I described in the above post...

  10. I was just experimenting with this last night!

     

    I have an RZ, two RZ lenses, one RB lens. Honestly I think that the electronics in the RZ are unpredictable in cold weather. There was a post above that mentioned an external battery holder - this would have to be the go in cold weather. The same goes for a Mamiya 7ii rangefinder. Mamiya supplies an external battery holder however I dont know if it can be used with teh RZ, Im still to find out.

     

    I have always had issues with my RZ in cold weather, more specifically - shutter delay. And Im not talking -0c temperatures, Im just talking a cold winter morning in the studio. Not fun when you have people waiting around on you. After a $300+ service, mamiya described it as "an intermittent problem", fuckers. The camera has not changed in its behaviour..!

     

    As for using RB lenses... This is possible. Set the shutter dail to RBL setting. Set the dial of the shutter release to the default (dead battery) mode (if you are looking at the camera front on, then swing the dial to the right). In these modes the mirror will release, as will the shutter on the RB lens. NOTE: this is when you do not have a battery installed. Be aware that in this mode the camera has no lock mechanisms active. In other words, if you have a darkslide in place the shutter will fire regardless.

     

    Other issues (not such a big deal) are things like the distance scale not correlating with the lens. Ive never used teh distance scale anyhow. No big deal.

     

    I think the RB's are better built, the mechanics much smoother and more tight. Having said this, the RZ has been my primary camera in MF. I love the 50mm lens, as I do the 110mm. Now Im going to have to make a decision. Do I use the RZ as a mechanical camera and sell my RZ lenses and replace them with RB lenses? Or do I replace the whole outfit with an RB system? bummer.

     

    goodluck!

×
×
  • Create New...