digitaldog

That isn't what was requested. Two untagged JPEGs are not going to fly. Save crop (or entire image) in native format, zip and upload both to something like Dropbox.

Zoom into the 16-bit image until you see the green issue; make screen capture. Zoom into the 8-bit image the same way; make screen capture. Save crop (or entire image) in native format, zip and upload both to something like Dropbox.

It could be a corrupted display profile or a profile built using v4 (instead of V2). That the green goes away when zooming, if that is the correct description, indicates this is a display path issue somewhere (IOW, it's not in the data as you describe it). But until you upload the image to something like Dropbox so others can examine it, there isn't much more we can do.

Try disabling GPU in the preferences If turning OFF the GPU works, it's a GPU bug, and you need to contact the manufacturer or find out if there's an updated driver for it. This is why disabling GPU is an option as more and more functionality moves to the GPU in newer versions of many Adobe products. Disable third-party graphics accelerators. Third-party GPU overclocking utilities and haxies aren't supported. 
https://helpx.adobe.com/premiere-elements/using/gpu-acceleration.html

For others entering this thread for the first or 2nd time, this is highly recommended if you have Apple Mail. Otherwise, if you have specific questions about the data I provided here, I'm happy to address those with open minds to data, facts, and (color) science.

A primer for you (since you asked a question): http://digitaldog.net/files/15TheRightLightpart1.pdf I appreciate your strong opinion about the SPDs provided, an opinion formed (by your own admission) of having absolutely no experience creating one. Anyway, with respect to Sandy's post here earlier, I think we're done. Since no one here is taking you seriously, and my data provided dismisses your recommendations of this LED as being far from a Solux replacement, and the fact that there are many dozens of Solux bulbs anyone can purchase from just one (of many websites), I don't see the point in illustrating further for others who may land here, the errors of your recommendations. Adiós.

Hopefully, if you are lucky, Sandy or another moderator can help you here as you helped yourself in the other photo forum after you raised this (off) topic:

You state this because you own this: https://xritephotous.com/i1basic-pro-3-open-box/ And you own this: https://babelcolor.com/store.htm And you know how to use both, and you will provide your own measurements. Not.

Maybe Sandy or someone else can tell you what you want to hear. I've provided the color science and data about the LEDs you recommended; they are hardly a Solux replacement other than they fit by being MR16s.

That is indeed a shame. 🥲 That makes no sense; no idea what you're looking for ("a corrected test report").

Then you're all set with an inferior LED that fits what you say you prefer: ("I prefer 12V MR16's since I have a 12-volt MR16 track lighting setup").

https://www.replacementlightbulbs.com/lamp18004.html There are (today) 87 Solux bulbs there for $7.43 each. If you need more than that, I'd be happy to search for other sites that will sell you the bulbs. MANY sites are selling them! That they are no longer being made isn't material to being able to replace them. You can buy them here: https://www.waveformlighting.com

As you can see from my reports, the halogen (in this case, 50W) is significantly brighter than the two LEDs.

What about it? No comparisons are necessary, OT; as it isn't a Solux "Replacement". That's the topic you started here. The real SPD was provided elsewhere for a blub that isn't an MR16 nor the same CTT and has nothing to do with Solux of which are still available.

The best Solux replacement for those who want the same qualities is yet another Solux bulb. https://www.replacementlightbulbs.com/lamp18004.html Plenty (94 in stock as of yesterday) is still available at a screaming price of $7.43. Less money than the suboptimal Sylvania (at least in terms of the spectrum). In Europe: https://shop.eiko-europe.de/SOLUX/SoLux-Daylight/SoLux-MR16-GU5-3-4700K-10-12V-35W.html

Sylvania True Wave "Daylight" (that failed) LED vs (non true wave) InterTech LED vs Solux 4700K. The best part of the Sylvania was it cost me a mere $7.99 plus tax. And yes, it fits my MR16 task lamp. As does the InterTech LED. Otherwise, nothing to write home about. Nothing like the Solux in terms of SPD or ISO 3664 goals. Not really that impressive compared to the InterTech for all the hype about Blue Wave technology. Do note the fail and pass for ISO 3664 on all three bulbs; note Solux failed the Brightness Goal of 2000 lux (it's much brighter than the others). Solux rates it as CCT 4700K, measured at just shy of CCT 4600 (so yeah, that metric is as some here know, some argue, all over the map). The task lamp was in the same position for all measurements without a diffuser, approx 3 feet from blub to Spectroradiometer. Popped the Solux back into the task lamp after these tests. Does anyone want to buy a used Sylvania True Wave "Daylight" cheap? 🤪

"If fifty million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing."-Bertrand Russell

Sandy, I know. But the facts and science (color science) are indisputable. I'm done.

It is good to see you cleaned up your claims above from what you wrote on LuLa after someone asked for specifics of the claims: https://forum.luminous-landscape.com/index.php?topic=141868.msg1250339#msg1250339 "Sylvania MR16 TruWave LED 40929 lamps are a direct replacement* for 4700K or 5000K SoLux bulbs. Fits directly into existing 12V MR16 fixtures. The TruWave Technology suppresses** the nasty blue peak present in most other LED lamps." *indeed, they do fit. Like all MR16 bulbs..... **"Suppresss" and eliminate the spike (peak); as seen here: big difference.

Someone needs to study SPDs (specifically Solux bulbs) before embracing one from a manufacturer, not one they didn't and cannot independently measure and provide to readers. Fortunatel, someone here can:

And you have and tested colorimetrically to back this up: yes or no???“replacement” only by virtue of fitting and they are not close to identical to Solux bulb which are not obsolete.

And: https://helpx.adobe.com/in/lightroom-classic/help/image-tone-color.html Last updated on 24 Jan 2023 https://focus.picfair.com/articles/how-to-create-beautiful-black-and-white-photos "There are many ways to convert your image to monochrome, and the only ‘right’ way is the one that gives you the result you’re after."

https://photopxl.com/black-white-conversion-in-lightroom-pxl-print-series/