aubrey

January 23, 2006

wildly wonderful

January 21, 2006

yea. yippie. hot. cool. it rocks. may i ask how many images went into this?

January 20, 2006

comments welcome. this is from a series of figure studies from my camping tent studio.

January 19, 2006

comments welcome.

January 17, 2006

very creative. i like it a lot.

January 16, 2006

it was shot in the evening and there was a fair amount of contrast between the lighted areas and dark areas.

January 16, 2006

comments most welcome.

January 12, 2006

yea. i like this very much. if you'll look in my portfolio's "twins" folder you'll see why. while our results are a bit different, the technique is the same. so cool.

January 10, 2006

i like it because it breaks the rules in an interesting way. i' sure some people will find it out of focus and misangled.

January 6, 2006

were you using a professional cosmetic make-up?

January 5, 2006

there are several natural layers to this image. i am curious what you see.

January 3, 2006

in the past couple days i have seen a plethora of nudes that were close-ups of female

genitalia. i hope this approach to the male figure is not censored. this shot is from my

"tent studio," where the light is always changing.

December 30, 2005

there's a story here, for sure, and i'd like to hear it.

December 23, 2005

it's a cool technique and has a high "wow" factor. imo, the quest of such work would be in using the technique to make lines that were highly expressive or beautiful or meaningful or interesting. imo, this image isn't pushing the art hard enough. luckily, in the digital age one can experiment with edgey exposures and have instant (and free) feedback. may i ask what you used as light sources here? filters on various sized flashlights are always good -- you may wish to also experiment with varying degrees of a flash (perhaps with color filter) to increase ambiant exposure.

December 15, 2005

i'm curious about digital infrared. did you shoot with a filter to only catch the near-infrared on your sensor or is this a photoshop effect?

December 13, 2005

i prefer the less processed. looks like the photo has great tones for printing to paper. one thing that bothers me for a classic composition such as this is the close proximity of the head and the border, i hate to see a subject bump his head.

December 5, 2005

comments welcome.

December 3, 2005

i know exactly where to look. actually that brings up an interesting point. as photographers we learn how to construct and compose an image so that the eye is directed where we wish. generally, too much clutter destroys that flow. but it seems, by this example, that the nude is so powerful a subject that even in a room of clutter the eye behaves in a most predictable way. yes, i really like that contemporary chest of drawers by the window.

December 1, 2005

noticing that you had given a few of my images high marks i thought i should check you out. i see you like rocks, too. that moon shot is really cool. it's so present. the shot here i like for the random geometry. you might also have likd my fossil bed shots. i shot about 3,000 images this summer at a large fossil bed. the various shapes were wonderful. my artsy friends liked the shots, but they got very low marks on photo.net. too gray, i suppose.